| Date |
Text |
| 2018-06-11 16:34:56 | CASE NO. PB1069Y |
| | KEISER UNIVERSITY EXPANDED PARKING LOT |
| | 2600 N. MILITARY TRAIL |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE |
| | (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS/THE PPRC MEETING (BY |
| | AUGUST 13, 2018), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED |
| | WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW |
| | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($300). |
| | |
| | 1) THE MASTER PLAN SHOULD CONTINUE TO SHOW THE EXPANDED |
| | PHASE II OF THE PARKING AREA AS PROPOSED BUILDING 15 |
| | (FUTURE CLASSROOM BUILDING) TO RETAIN MAXIMUM SITE |
| | DEVELOPMENT FLEXIBILITY UNDER THE APPROVED MASTER PLAN. |
| | BUILDINGS BUILT IN THE LOCATION SHOWN ON THE MASTER |
| | PLAN ARE PERMITTED TO BE APPROVED AS A FORMAL SITE PLAN |
| | AND DO NOT REQUIRE CITY COMMISSION APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 2) THE EXISTING SIDEWALK ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF |
| | UNIVERSITY DRIVE NEEDS TO EXTEND THE LENGTH OF THE |
| | PROPOSED PARKING LOTS (PHASE I AND II) AS THEY ARE |
| | CONSTRUCTED. |
| | |
| | 3) PLEASE CONSIDER EXTENDING A SIDEWALK, SEPARATED FROM |
| | THE TRAVEL LANE, FROM THE MAIN CAMPUS ENTRANCE AT |
| | MILITARY TRAIL TO POINT THE SIDEWALK WILL END BASED ON |
| | COMMENT NO. 2. PALMTRAN HAS TOLD THE CITY THAT THE STOP |
| | BY THE MAIN ENTRANCE IS HEAVILY USED, SO A SIDEWALK |
| | PROVIDES A SAFE CONNECTION TO THE CAMPUS. |
| | |
| | 4) YOU SHOULD CONSIDER HAVING AN ADDITIONAL ENTRY POINT |
| | TO THE PARKING LOT FOR UNIVERSITY DRIVE FOR PHASE II OF |
| | THE PARKING LOT. |
| | |
| | 5) PLEASE CONSIDER USING CURBS WITH A TWO FOOT OVERHANG |
| | INSTEAD OF WHEEL STOPS AT THE END OF THE PARKING |
| | SPACES. THE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWS THAT THE PARKING LOT IS |
| | SLOPED TO THE MIDDLE OF THE DRIVE AISLES, SO THERE IS |
| | NO SHEET FLOW IMPACT OF CURBING THE PARKING SPACES. |
| | |
| | 6) PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS ACROSS THE PARKING AISLES AND |
| | ROWS TO PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THEY MEET MINIMUM |
| | REQUIREMENTS. THIS WAS DONE ON THE PLANS THAT WERE |
| | APPROVED BY RESOLUTION NO. 48-18. |
| | |
| | 7) PROVIDE A DETAIL OF HOW THE PARKING LOT WILL LOOK |
| | WITH ONLY PHASE I CONSTRUCTED. THIS NEEDS TO INCLUDE |
| | THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES (THE HEAVY LINE ON |
| | SHEET MP.3 SHOWS MORE SPACES THAN THE LISTED 129 IN |
| | PHASE I), HOW THE DRIVE AISLES ARE ARRAIGNED, HOW THE |
| | LANDSCAPE WILL BE INSTALLED TO MEET PARKING CODE |
| | REQUIREMENTS, ETC. |
| | |
| | 8) THE MASTER PLAN DRAWINGS DO NOT SHOW THE UNIVERSITY |
| | DRIVE CROSSWALK. |
| | |
| | 9) PLEASE CONSIDER RELOCATING THE SPEED HUMP AND |
| | INSTALLING IT AS A TABLE TOP WITH A CROSSWALK. THIS |
| | WILL PROVIDE ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN SAFETY CROSSING |
| | UNIVERSITY DRIVE. |
| | |
| | 10) THE PHASE II PARKING LOT LAYOUT AND ITS |
| | RELATIONSHIP TO THE DEVOS-COOK ACADEMIC CENTER LENDS |
| | ITSELF TO PEOPLE CUTTING ACROSS THE LANDSCAPED AREA |
| | BETWEEN THE PARKING AND UNIVERSITY DRIVE. PLEASE |
| | CONSIDER ADDING A COUPLE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS TO |
| | UNIVERSITY DRIVE AND ACROSS TO THE SIDEWALK REQUIRED BY |
| | COMMENT NO. 2. |
| | |
| | 11) THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN NEEDS TO CONTINUE TO THE |
| | PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE SHOW THAT THERE WILL BE LESS THAN |
| | ONE FOOTCANDLE AT THE PROPERTY LINE AND THAT THERE WILL |
| | BE NO GLARE ONTO THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TO THE NORTH. |
| | |
| | 12) THE LIGHT POLES NEED TO BE SET BACK A MINIMUM OF 15 |
| | FEET FROM THE NORTHERN (SIDE) PROPERTY LINE. THERE IS |
| | ONE LIGHT POLE THAT IS LESS THAN 10 FEET FROM THE |
| | PROPERTY LINE AND ONE THAT IS CLOSE TO 15 FEET FROM THE |
| | NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE. ONE LIGHT POLE NEEDS TO BE |
| | RELOCATED AND THE OTHER NEEDS TO HAVE THE DIMENSION TAG |
| | INCLUDED TO VERIFY THAT IT MEETS THE 15 FOOT SETBACK |
| | REQUIREMENT. |
| | |
| | 13) AT ONE POINT THERE WAS DISCUSSION OF THE TEMPORARY |
| | BLEACHER LAYOUT BEFORE THE PERMANENT BLEACHERS WITH |
| | PRESS BOX IS CONSTRUCTED. IS THIS STILL THE PLAN, |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT A SHEET SHOWING THIS CONFIGURATION SO |
| | THAT STAFF CAN REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE SITE |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 14) THE ADDITIONAL LIVE OAK AND BUTTONWOOD TREES SHOWN |
| | ALONG THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE ARE SPECIFIED AT THE |
| | CODE MINIMUM OF 12 FEET. IN RESOLUTION NO. 48-18, THE |
| | CITY COMMISSION REQUIRED THAT THE ADDITIONAL CANOPY |
| | TREES ALONG THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE ARE TO ENHANCE |
| | THE RESIDENTIAL PRIVACY. IN ORDER TO MEET THIS |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATION, LARGER TREES NEED TO BE |
| | INSTALLED. |
| | |
| | 15) RESOLUTION NO. 48-18 REQUIRES THE INSTALLATION OF |
| | TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS FOR THE SOFTBALL FIELD |
| | PARKING ROW. THIS NEEDS TO BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS WITH |
| | THIS SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
