| Date |
Text |
| 2019-06-06 09:26:28 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE MAY |
| | 22, 2019 REVIEW PACKAGE: |
| | 1. V. NOEL WAS PROVIDED WITH A SIGNED AND SEALED |
| | BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY. THE RELATIONSHIP |
| | BETWEEN THE NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929 VERTICAL DATUMS AT |
| | THIS LOCATION NEEDS TO BE LISTED ON THE SURVEY. [REPEAT |
| | COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 2. SHOW FLOW AREAS FOR THE CROSS SECTION D AS SHOWN FOR |
| | THE OTHER SECTIONS ON SHEET C3.2. |
| | |
| | 3. THE ELEVATIONS FOR THE CROSS SECTIONS ON SHEET C3.2 |
| | DO NOT MATCH THE GRADING SHOWN ON SHEET C2.1. SUGGEST |
| | SHOWING THE CROSS SECTIONS WITHOUT THE ELEVATION GRID. |
| | |
| | 4. PROVIDE CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING |
| | DRAINAGE SYSTEM ON N. ROSEMARY AVE. [REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 5. STORMWATER SYSTEM FOR THE PARCEL NORTH OF 8TH STREET |
| | TO PROVIDE WATER QUALITY TREATMENT AND PEAK FLOW |
| | ATTENUATION PER SFWMD CRITERIA. |
| | |
| | 6. DRAINAGE EASEMENT (MINIMUM 5 FEET FROM CENTERLINE OF |
| | PIPE) WILL BE NEEDED FOR THE PIPE BETWEEN S-303 AND THE |
| | EXISTING CATCH BASIN. |
| | |
| | 7. SHEET C6.1 IS MISLABELED. SHEET INDEX SHOWS IT |
| | SHOULD BE LABELED SITE DEMOLITION AND EROSON CONTROL |
| | PLAN. |
| | |
| | 8. ON THE DEMOLITION PLAN SHOW THE DEMOLITION OF 8TH |
| | STREET FOR THE HARDSCAPE ITEMS. |
| | |
| | 9. WHO IS DESIGNING THE RAISED INTERSECTIONS ON 8TH |
| | STREET? HOW WILL IT AFFECT THE EXISTING DRAINAGE |
| | PATTERNS AT THESE INTERSECTIONS? |
| | |
| | 10. ROOT BARRIERS WILL BE NEEDED FOR THE OAK TREE NEXT |
| | TO EXISTING INLET AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 8TH STREET |
| | AND N. ROSEMARY AVE. |
| | |
| | 11. SEVERAL CONFLICTS BETWEEN PROPOSED STORM PIPE ON |
| | HENRIETTA AVE AND EXISTING/PROPOSED TREES. |
| | |
| | 12. SEVERAL CONFLICTS BETWEEN PROPOSED STORM PIPE ON N. |
| | ROSEMARY AVE AND PROPOSED TREES. |
| | |
| | 13. HOW IS THIS PROJECT BEING COORDINATED WITH THE |
| | PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 8TH STREET? |
| | |
| | 14. STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE PROPOSED ALLEY R/W |
| | ABANDONMENT SHOULD FLOW TO THE ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. |
| | |
| | 15. SHOW AND LABEL THE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES AT EACH |
| | END OF THE ALLEY TO BE ABANDONED AND SHOW PROPOSED |
| | EASEMENTS ON THE CIVIL PLANS. |
| | |
| | 16. THE WIDTH OF THE TRAVEL LANES CANNOT INCLUDE THE |
| | GUTTER. (P&Z SITE PLAN SHEET A0.04) |
| | |
| | 17. CORRECT THE LABELING AND DIMENSIONING OF THE |
| | HENRIETTA AVE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON SHEET A0.04. THE 50.0 |
| | DIMENSION AT THE SOUTH END OF THE STREET IS SHOWN FROM |
| | BACK OF SIDEWALK TO BACK OF SIDEWALK. THE DIMENSION AT |
| | THE NORTH END OF THE STREET READS ?40.0 R.O.W. (WAS |
| | 30.0 R.O.W.)? AND IS SHOWN FROM FRONT OF SIDEWALK TO |
| | FRONT OF SIDEWALK. RIGHT OF WAY LINES SHOULD MATCH THE |
| | BOUNDARY SURVEY. |
| | |
| | TRACY WARD, P.E. |
| | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-494-1120 |
| | |
| |
Print |
