| Date |
Text |
| 2019-02-13 15:20:54 | NOTE: QUITE A NUMBER OF PREVIOUS COMMENTS WERE NOT |
| | ADDRESSED AND ARE REPEATED HERE. |
| | 1. A TRAFFIC STATEMENT WAS NEVER PROVIDED WITH THE |
| | SUBMITTAL. PLEASE PROVIDE EVENT DATA ON THE EXISTING |
| | DEVELOPMENT, AND DISCUSS THE ACTIVITIES WHICH WILL BE |
| | HELD ON SITE, INCLUDING INFORMATION ON THE HOURS OF |
| | OPERATIONS, DURATION, PROJECTED NUMBER OF ATTENDEES, |
| | ETC. PLEASE VERIFY WHETHER THE PROVIDED PARKING SPACES |
| | WOULD BE SUFFICIENT FOR THE PLANNED ACTIVITIES. |
| | 2. LABEL RADIUSES OF CURB RETURNS. |
| | 3. PROVIDE TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR PUBLIC STREETS |
| | INCLUDING 8TH STREET AND THE ALLEY WITH DIMENSIONS |
| | 4. PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY AS REQUIRED IN THE |
| | CITY'S DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM. |
| | 5. REVISE SITE PLAN TO SHOW NORTH CURB LINE AND ANY |
| | CURB CUTS ON NORTH SIDE OF NINTH STREET |
| | 6. LIVE OAKS ARE PROPOSED UNDER POWER LINE ON NORTH |
| | ROSEMARY AVE. CHECK FPL REQUIREMENTS. |
| | 7. EIGHT-FOOT WIDE SIDEWALKS ARE REQUIRED FOR |
| | NON-RESIDENTIAL IN THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN. |
| | 8. ON-SITE, PROVIDE SIGHT TRIANGLE EXHIBIT FOR SIGHT |
| | LINE WITH DUMPSTER. |
| | 9. THE 20-FOOT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SHOULD BE DRAWN |
| | ALONG THE CORNER OF PROPERTY LINES. PLEASE REVISE. |
| | 10. SHEET A0.04 EIGHT ST. IS NOTED AS 60' ROW, BUT 50' |
| | PLOTTED. CLARIFY WHY THERE ARE TWO RIGHT OF WAY WIDTHS. |
| | 11. WE DON'T SUPPORT SHIFTING OF ROSEMARY TO PROVIDE |
| | PARALLEL PARKING ON ONE SIDE AS THIS WILL MAKE IT |
| | DIFFICULT FOR THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STREET TO PROVIDE |
| | PARALLEL PARKING IN THE FUTURE. THIS WILL ALSO CAUSE |
| | ROSEMARY AVENUE TO SHIFT THROUGH INTERSECTIONS AT NINTH |
| | STREET AND EIGHT STREET. PLEASE HOLD ROADWAY CENTERLINE |
| | AND WIDEN ONSITE FOR PARALLEL PARKING. |
| | 12. THE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION AT MIDBLOCK ON 8TH STREET |
| | GOES THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF THE VALET/DROPOFF LANE. |
| | PROVIDE A BULB OUT AT THIS LOCATION FOR THE MIDBLOCK |
| | CONNECTION. ALSO, THE CIVIL PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THIS |
| | MIDBLOCK CONNECTION. PLEASE REVISE. |
| | 13. ARE STREET LIGHTS BEING PROPOSED? WHO WILL MAINTAIN |
| | THE STREET LIGHTS? |
| | |
| | SHING TSOI |
| | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT |
| | 561-494-1141 |
| | [email protected] |
| |
Print |
