| Date |
Text |
| 2018-06-12 09:19:21 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) ABSTRACTED SURVEY REQUIRED. ADDITIONALLY, THE |
| | SUBMITTED SURVEY DOES NOT ACCURATELY REFLECT ALL |
| | EXISTING STRUCTURES ON AND ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY |
| | (I.E. OVERHEAD LINES, POLES, ETC.). |
| | |
| | 2.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC |
| | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR |
| | WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE |
| | COLLECTION SERVICES. |
| | |
| | 3.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| | CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH |
| | INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE |
| | PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES: FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT |
| | (FP&L) AND COMCAST. |
| | |
| | 4.) A COUNTY TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW |
| | LETTER STATING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT MEETS THE TPS |
| | OF THE COUNTY SHALL BE REQUIRED AS A PREREQUISITE FOR |
| | SITE PLAN APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 5.) CROSS ACCESS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SUBJECT PARCEL |
| | AND THE PARCEL IMMEDIATELY EAST SHALL BE PROVIDED TO |
| | STAFF PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 6.) THE TWO (2) EXISTING POLE SIGNS ON THE SUBJECT |
| | PROPERTY ARE CONSIDERED LEGAL NONCOMPLYING SIGNS, AND |
| | SHALL BE REGULATED BY SECTION 94-404 OF THE ZONING AND |
| | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, SHOULD THESE SIGNS BECOME |
| | OBSOLETE. |
| | |
| | 7.) ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, INCLUDING NEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF AN |
| | EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS |
| | ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN $750,000.00 IS SUBJECT TO |
| | THE ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 78, |
| | ARTICLE V, OF THE CITY?S CODE OF ORDINANCES. |
| | |
| | 8.) ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS SHALL BE REFLECTED IN ALL |
| | PLANS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) THE PROPOSED CROSS ACCESS WILL ELIMINATE EXISTING |
| | PARKING ON THE ADJACENT SITE (FLANIGAN'S RESTAURANT). |
| | HOW MANY SPACES ARE BEING REMOVED TO ACCOMMODATE THE |
| | CROSS ACCESS? STAFF IS REQUESTING THAT THE APPLICANT |
| | PROVIDE THE PARKING CALCULATIONS AND NUMBER OF EXISTING |
| | PARKING SPACES PROVIDED FOR THE ADJACENT FLANIGAN'S |
| | SITE. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT IF THE ADJACENT SITE DOES |
| | NOT MEET THE CURRENT MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | THE ZLDRS, THE APPLICANT WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ELIMINATE |
| | THE PARKING STALLS AND/OR REQUIRED TO RELOCATE THE |
| | REMOVED PARKING STALLS ELSEWHERE ON THE ADJACENT |
| | PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 2.) THE MINIMUM DISTANCE SEPARATION BETWEEN THE ACCESS |
| | POINT ON MALVERNE ROAD AND THE CORNER CLEARANCE TO |
| | SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY IS 50 FT. THE PROPOSED ACCESS POINT |
| | ON MALVERNE ROAD DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THIS MINIMUM |
| | DISTANCE SEPARATION (APPROX. 30 FT.). PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| | [ZLDR S.94-312(2)A.] |
| | |
| | 3.) THERE SEEMS TO BE AN EXCESS NUMBER OF |
| | INGRESS/EGRESS POINTS TO THE SITE. STAFF HIGHLY |
| | RECOMMENDS ELIMINATING AN ACCESS POINT (I.E. MALVERNE |
| | ROAD) TO THE PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 4.) SANITATION PICK-UP SHALL BE PROVIDED ON-SITE AND |
| | NOT ALONG MALVERNE ROAD. PLEASE RELOCATE THE DUMPSTER |
| | ENCLOSURE TO WITHIN THE ON-SITE PARKING AREA. |
| | |
| | 5.) LIGHT POLE FIXTURES SHALL BE SETBACK AT LEAST 5 FT. |
| | FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE INCLUDE SETBACK DISTANCE |
| | IN THE PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR S.94-145] |
| | |
| | 6.) BICYCLE RACK DETAIL DOES NOT MATCH THE RACK |
| | PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR |
| | CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 7.) IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF THE ANY MECHANICAL |
| | EQUIPMENT PROPOSED FOR THE PROJECT (I.E. A/C UNIT(S), |
| | GENERATORS, ETC.). MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MAY NOT PROJECT |
| | MORE THAN 4 FT. INTO A SETBACK; ANY ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT |
| | SHALL BE SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW BY A PARAPET OR |
| | WALL. [ZLDR S.94-305(B)(4)] |
| | |
| | 8.) PARKING AND STRIPING DETAIL MUST MATCH THE SITE |
| | PLAN. THERE IS NO DETAIL ILLUSTRATING THE PARKING |
| | STALLS WITH A 2 FT. CURB OVERHANG. ARE WHEEL STOPS |
| | PROPOSED FOR ANY OF THE PARKING STALLS? |
| | |
| | 9.) PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE SITE |
| | DATA TABULAR: PROJECT NUMBER IS ISPR 18-11/Z18050028; |
| | MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT INFORMATION SHALL MATCH THE |
| | DIMENSION PROVIDED IN THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS. |
| | |
| | 10.) PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TABULAR: MINIMUM LOT DIMENSION |
| | IS 5,000 SQ. FT. (NOT 10,000 SQ. FT.); MINIMUM LOT |
| | WIDTH IS 50 FT. (NOT 100 FT.). |
| | |
| | |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE COMMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED BY |
| | THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE PLANNER. |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTURAL (FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS) COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) NEW STRUCTURES ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY SHOULD BE |
| | DESIGNED TO PROMOTE AND ENCOURAGE WALKABILITY ALONG THE |
| | SOUTH DIXIE CORRIDOR. BUILDING DESIGN ELEMENTS THAT CAN |
| | BE INCORPORATED TO IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN ACCESSIBILITY, |
| | INCLUDE: LOCATING STOREFRONTS/CUSTOMER ACCESS ALONG |
| | DIXIE HIGHWAY AND SOUTHERN BOULEVARD; MAXIMIZING |
| | BUILDING FRONTAGE ALONG STREET(S), AND BY PROVIDING |
| | GLAZING/TRANSPARENCY INTO STOREFRONTS. THE LAYOUT |
| | (FLOOR PLAN AND ELEVATIONS) OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING |
| | DOES NOT SEEM TO EXHIBIT DESIGN QUALITIES THAT PROMOTE |
| | PEDESTRIAN-ACTIVITY ALONG THESE STREETS. PLEASE |
| | ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 2.) DIMENSIONS SHALL INCLUDE THE OVERALL HEIGHT OF THE |
| | PROPOSED BUILDING (INCLUDING THE PARAPET) IN THE |
| | ELEVATION DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | 3.) THE WEST ELEVATION SHOWS AN ARCHITECTURAL |
| | OVERHANG/PROJECTION FROM THE BUILDING, WHICH IS NOT |
| | REFLECTED IN THE FLOOR AND SITE PLANS. THE PROJECTION |
| | SHALL BE REFLECTED IN ALL PLANS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | INCLUDE DIMENSIONS FOR ANY PROJECTION. PLEASE NOTE THAT |
| | STRUCTURAL OVERHANGS SHALL NOT EXTEND FARTHER THAN 3 |
| | FT. INTO ANY SETBACK. [ZLDR S.94-305(B)(2)] |
| | |
| | |
| | SIGNAGE COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) A MAXIMUM OF THREE (3) WALL SIGNS IS PERMITTED FOR |
| | THE PROPOSED BUILDING. THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS |
| | INDICATE THAT THERE WILL BE A TOTAL OF TEN (10) WALL |
| | SIGNS. [ZLDR S.94-408(D)(1)] |
| | |
| | 2.) CONSIDER ELIMINATING ONE OR BOTH EXISTING LEGAL |
| | NON-CONFORMING POLE SIGNS, WHEN ADDRESSING THE SITE |
| | DESIGN/ARCHITECTURAL ISSUES. |
| | |
| | |
| | LIGHTING PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE |
| | GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE |
| | AWAY FROM ALL ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT |
| | RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES. A NOTE SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED IN THE PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-309(A)] |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF |
| | FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 |
| | INCHES X 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 |
| | INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY |
| | RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20 PERCENT ($200) OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION |
| | FEE. |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 OR |
| | [email protected] IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
