| Date |
Text |
| 2019-10-16 16:58:38 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) THE SURVEY SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION IS A COPY |
| | AND IS OUTDATED (DATED 12/14/16). PLEASE PROVIDE AN |
| | UPDATED SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY. THE SURVEY MUST BE |
| | ABSTRACTED, SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA |
| | REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. THE SURVEY MUST ALSO |
| | ACCURATELY REFLECT WHAT IS EXISTING ON THE PROPERTY AND |
| | IMMEDIATE SURROUNDING AREAS (I.E. THERE SEEMS TO BE AN |
| | EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT ON BISCAYNE DRIVE THAT IS NOT |
| | REFLECTED IN THE SURVEY OR THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN; |
| | HOWEVER, IT IS REFLECTED IN THE CIVIL PLANS). [5/4/2018 |
| | AND 5/29/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 2.) THE PROJECT REQUIRES THE APPROVAL OF PB CASE NO. |
| | 1751 (ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF BISCAYNE DRIVE, JUST |
| | WEST OF THE FEC RAILROAD). PB 1751 IS CURRENTLY PENDING |
| | WITH THE PLANNING DIVISION. |
| | |
| | 3.) A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW LETTER |
| | FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION, STATING |
| | THAT THE PROPOSE PROJECT MEETS THE TPS OF THE OF THE |
| | COUNTY IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF THE SITE |
| | PLAN. |
| | |
| | 4.) THE CITY'S TRAFFIC ENGINEER WILL NEED TO DETERMINE |
| | IF THE ON-STREET PARKING ON FLAMINGO DRIVE IS |
| | PERMITTED. DOCUMENTATION MAY BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PROVIDE WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION FROM SANITATION THAT |
| | THE LOCATION OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE IS ADEQUATE. |
| | [5/29/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 2.) A NEW LIFT STATION WAS DESIGNED AT THE SAME |
| | LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, PER THE |
| | ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL (RECEIVED 3/13/2018). WHAT HAPPENED |
| | TO THE LIFT STATION? IT SEEMED TO HAVE DISAPPEARED FROM |
| | THE PLANS (I.E. HAS IT BEEN RELOCATED AND IF SO, |
| | WHERE?). [5/29/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 3.) BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS INCORRECT. PLEASE |
| | REVISE. [ZLDR S.94-485(Q)] [5/29/2019 REPEAT COMMENT ? |
| | THE MINIMUM BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR THE PROJECT |
| | IS 2 AND NOT 1.] |
| | |
| | 4.) STRUCTURAL OVERHANGS/DECORATIVE FEATURES SHALL NOT |
| | PROJECT FARTHER THAN 3 FT. INTO ANY SETBACK. PLEASE |
| | ILLUSTRATE AND DIMENSION ALL PROJECTIONS FROM THE |
| | BUILDING (I.E. CANOPIES, ETC.). [5/4/2018 REPEAT |
| | COMMENT ? NO DIMENSIONS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED.] |
| | |
| | 5.) REFERENCE THE CODE SECTION FOR THE 0 FT. INTERIOR |
| | SIDE SETBACK ALLIANCE FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES |
| | ABUTTING THE RAILROAD TRACK. REFERENCE: ZLDR |
| | S.94-305(B)(11)] [5/4/2018 AND 5/29/2019 REPEAT COMMENT |
| | ? NOTE IN SITE PLAN IS INCOMPLETE AND ALSO DUPLICATED. |
| | PLEASE CLEAN-UP!] |
| | |
| | 6.) PLEASE VERIFY THE WEST BUILDING SETBACK. IT SEEMS |
| | TO BE INCORRECT IN THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TABLE. |
| | ALSO, WHY IS THERE A NOTATION (*) FOR THE WEST SIDE |
| | SETBACK? |
| | |
| | 7.) NOTE REFERENCING THE SURVEY INDICATES THE SURVEY |
| | WAS UPDATED ON 8/1/19; HOWEVER, STAFF HAD NOT RECEIVED |
| | THIS UPDATED SURVEY. PLEASE PROVIDE. |
| | |
| | 8.) CALCULATIONS FOR THE LANDSCAPE AREA IN THE SITE |
| | DATA TABULAR DOES NOT MATCH THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN |
| | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. PEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 9.) THE CITY'S DIMENSIONAL STANDARD FOR DUMPSTER |
| | ENCLOSURES HAVE CHANGED. PLEASE CONTACT MATT HERJAZI IN |
| | THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (561-822-2045) FOR DETAILS. |
| | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DIMENSIONS IN THE SITE PLAN AND IN |
| | THE DETAIL WILL NEED TO BE CORRECTED. |
| | |
| | 10.) STAFF BELIEVES THAT THE BICYCLE RACK CAN BE PLACED |
| | CLOSER TO THE FRONT ENTRANCE OF THE BUILDING AND |
| | UNDERNEATH A CANOPY FOR PROTECTION FROM THE ELEMENTS. |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 11.) PLEASE CLARIFY THAT THE 6 FT. HIGH CONCRETE WALL |
| | WILL RUN ALONG THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE WEST PROPERTY |
| | LINE, PER HPB CASE NO. 18-27 CONDITION. IT IS UNCLEAR |
| | IN THE SITE PLAN. ALSO, THE WALL MUST BE REFLECTED IN |
| | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR CONSISTENCY. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE |
| | OF IDENTIFYING THE FIRST 25 FT. FROM THE FRONT PROPERTY |
| | LINE? |
| | |
| | 12.) THE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE IS 20 FT. (NOT 25 |
| | FT.). |
| | |
| | 13.) THE BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE FIRST FLOOR IS |
| | INCORRECT IN THE SITE PLAN (I.E. SHOWS 2,450 SQ. FT. |
| | NOT 31,307 SQ. FT.) |
| | |
| | 14.) THE "S" IS MISSING IN THE ?HISTORIC PRESERVATION |
| | CONDITIONS. |
| | |
| | |
| | LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) A MINIMUM 5 FT. WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER STRIP SHALL |
| | BE PROVIDED ALONG THE PORTION OF THE EAST PROPERTY LINE |
| | WHERE THERE IS NO BUILDING AND ABUTS THE RAILROAD ROW. |
| | [ZLDR S.94-443(B)] [5/4/2018 AND 5/29/2019 REPEAT |
| | COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 2.) LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IS NOT |
| | CONSISTENT WITH THE CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN THE SITE |
| | DATA TABULAR. |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS (FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS) |
| | |
| | 1.) DIMENSIONS FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS ARE |
| | STILL MISSING FROM THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | |
| | LIGHTING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY/ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE |
| | SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO |
| | REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY FROM ALL ADJACENT |
| | RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT RESIDENCES OR PUBLIC |
| | THOROUGHFARES. A NOTE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE SITE |
| | PLAN PLAN TO ADDRESS COMPLIANCE. [5/4/2018 AND |
| | 5/29/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | |
| | SIGNAGE COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PER ZLDR SEC.94-149(13)A., ONLY ONE (1) |
| | SINGLE-FACED SIGN IS PERMITTED. THE PROPOSED |
| | FREESTANDING SIGN IS DOUBLE-SIDED, WHICH IS NOT |
| | PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | 2.) REVISE SIGNAGE NOTE ON SHEET SP-1, TO STATE "ALL |
| | SIGNAGE DETAILS WILL BE PROVIDED AT BUILDING PERMIT AND |
| | SHALL COMPLY WITH ZLDR S.94-149(13)." ADDITIONALLY, THE |
| | NOTE SHALL BE PROVIDED ON ALL ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS WITH |
| | ANY PROPOSED SIGNAGE ON THE ELEVATIONS. |
| | |
| | 3.) IT?S NOT CLEAR WHY THE ONLY MONUMENT SIGN WITHIN |
| | THE PROJECT (AS SPECIFIED IN THE RESPONSE TO STAFF?S |
| | COMMENTS, DATED 9/27), IS NOTED AS ?DETAIL A? IN THE |
| | PLANS. THIS IMPLIES THAT THERE ARE MULTIPLE |
| | DETAILS/SIGNS ON THE PROPERTY. THE ?A? SHOULD BE |
| | ELIMINATED IF IT REFERENCES THE ONLY FREESTANDING SIGN |
| | ON THE PROPERTY. PLEASE ADDRESS. [5/29/19 MODIFIED |
| | COMMENT] |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF |
| | FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 |
| | INCHES X 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 |
| | INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | * CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NOT ADDITIONAL COST. IF |
| | PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE |
| | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED |
| | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE |
| | ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($200.00). |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE |
| | QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
