| Date |
Text |
| 2019-05-29 16:12:14 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) THE SURVEY SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION IS A COPY |
| | AND IS OUTDATED (DATED 12/14/16). PLEASE PROVIDE AN |
| | UPDATED SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY. THE SURVEY MUST BE |
| | ABSTRACTED, SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA |
| | REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. THE SURVEY MUST ALSO |
| | ACCURATELY REFLECT WHAT IS EXISTING ON THE PROPERTY AND |
| | IMMEDIATE SURROUNDING AREAS (I.E. THERE SEEMS TO BE AN |
| | EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT ON BISCAYNE DRIVE THAT IS NOT |
| | REFLECTED IN THE SURVEY OR THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN; |
| | HOWEVER, IT IS REFLECTED IN THE CIVIL PLANS). [5/4/2018 |
| | REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 2.) THE PROPOSAL REQUIRES THE APPROVAL OF PB CASE NO. |
| | 1751 (ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF BISCAYNE DRIVE, JUST |
| | WEST OF THE FEC RAILROAD). PB 1751 IS CURRENTLY PENDING |
| | WITH THE PLANNING DIVISION, AS THE TURNAROUND ON |
| | BISCAYNE DRIVE MUST BE RESOLVED TO STAFF?S SATISFACTION |
| | PRIOR TO THE ABANDONMENT APPLICATION MOVING FORWARD. |
| | [5/4/2018 REPEAT COMMENT - STAFF DOES NOT BELIEVE THIS |
| | ISSUE HAS BEEN RESOLVED. DOCUMENTATION FROM THE |
| | ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT IS ALSO REQUIRED TO VERIFY THAT |
| | THE ISSUE HAS BEEN RESOLVED.] |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) IT IS UNCERTAIN IF THE DRIVE/TURNAROUND ON THE |
| | SOUTH SIDE OF BISCAYNE DRIVE, LOCATED ON THE ADJACENT |
| | SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOT IS EXISTING/HAS BEEN |
| | MODIFIED. THIS MUST BE CLARIFIED IN THE PLANS. ANY USE |
| | OF THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FOR ANY VEHICULAR |
| | TURN-AROUND IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. [5/4/2018 REPEAT |
| | COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 2.) PROVIDE WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION FROM SANITATION THAT |
| | THE LOCATION OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE IS ADEQUATE. |
| | |
| | 3.) A NEW LIFT STATION WAS DESIGNED AT THE SAME |
| | LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, PER THE |
| | ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL (RECEIVED 3/13/2018). WHAT HAPPENED |
| | TO THE LIFT STATION? IT SEEMED TO HAVE DISAPPEARED FROM |
| | THE PLANS (I.E. HAS IT BEEN RELOCATED AND IF SO, |
| | WHERE?). |
| | |
| | 4.) THE BICYCLE RACK IN THE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE |
| | DETAILED PROVIDED AT THE BOTTOM OF SHEET SP-1. THE |
| | DETAIL MUST MATCH THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE REVISE FOR |
| | CONSISTENCY. [5/4/2018 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 5.) BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS INCORRECT. PLEASE |
| | REVISE. [ZLDR S.94-485(Q)] |
| | |
| | 6.) PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE 8 FT. X 15 FT. CANOPY |
| | STRUCTURE LOCATED BETWEEN OUTDOOR COURTS 1 AND 2. THE |
| | DETAIL IS STILL MISSING FROM THE PLAN. [5/4/2018 REPEAT |
| | COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 7.) SHOW THE LOCATION OF ANY MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT |
| | PROVIDED FOR THE PROJECT (I.E. ROOFTOP OR GROUND |
| | LEVEL). ANY MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED FROM |
| | PUBLIC VIEW. [5/4/2018 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 8.) STRUCTURAL OVERHANGS/DECORATIVE FEATURES SHALL NOT |
| | PROJECT FARTHER THAN 3 FT. INTO ANY SETBACK. PLEASE |
| | ILLUSTRATE AND DIMENSION ALL PROJECTIONS FROM THE |
| | BUILDING (I.E. CANOPIES, ETC.). [5/4/2018 REPEAT |
| | COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 9.) REFERENCE THE CODE SECTION FOR THE 0 FT. INTERIOR |
| | SIDE SETBACK ALLIANCE FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES |
| | ABUTTING THE RAILROAD TRACK. REFERENCE: ZLDR |
| | S.94-305(B)(11)] [5/4/2018 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 10.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA |
| | TABULAR: INCLUDE PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE INFORMATION |
| | FOR THE REQUIRED ELEMENTS (I.E. IMPERVIOUS/PERVIOUS |
| | SURFACE AREA, LANDSCAPE AREA, OPEN SPACE AREA, ETC.); |
| | BUILDING HEIGHT INFORMATION SHOULD INCLUDED THE MAXIMUM |
| | HEIGHT ALLOWED IN THE DISTRICT AND THE PROPOSED HEIGHT |
| | OF THE BUILDING; PARKING CALCULATIONS INCORRECT - |
| | PLEASE REVISE. [5/4/2018 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 11.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS TABULAR: THE MINIMUM BUILDING SIDE SETBACK |
| | TO THE WEST SEEMS TO BE 10 FT. (NOT 57.1 FT. AS NOTED |
| | IN THE PLANS). SETBACK MUST BE MEASURED FROM THE |
| | CLOSEST POINT OF THE BUILDING TO THE PROPERTY LINE. |
| | [ZLDR S.94-149(2)] [5/4/2018 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 12.) ONE INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLAND SHALL BE REQUIRED |
| | FOR EVERY TEN (10) PARKING SPACES IN A ROW. THE PARKING |
| | AREA DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THIS STANDARD. PLEASE |
| | ADDRESS. [ZLDR S.94-443(C)(3)] |
| | |
| | 13.) PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE PROPOSED 6 FT. HIGH WALL |
| | ALONG THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE. |
| | |
| | 14.) THE NOTE REFERENCING THE SURVEY AT THE BOTTOM OF |
| | SHEET SP-1 IS INCORRECT. PLEASE ADDRESS WITH A NEW |
| | SURVEY. |
| | |
| | 15.) REFERENCE TO HPB CASE NO. 18-27 SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | IN THE PLANS AS"A NOTE. |
| | |
| | 16.) THE BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE NUMBERS (1ST AND 2ND |
| | FLOOR) IN THE SITE PLAN DO NOT MATCH THE NUMBERS |
| | PROVIDED IN THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR |
| | CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | |
| | LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) A MINIMUM 5 FT. WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER STRIP SHALL |
| | BE PROVIDED ALONG THE PORTION OF THE EAST PROPERTY LINE |
| | WHERE THERE IS NO BUILDING AND ABUTS THE RAILROAD ROW. |
| | [ZLDR S.94-443(B)] [5/4/2018 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 2.) FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL BE SIGNED, DATED AND |
| | SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS (FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS) |
| | |
| | 1.) ELEVATIONS AND FLOOR PLAN SHALL BE CONSISTENT |
| | (INCLUDING ALL ACCESS POINTS AND OPENINGS, STRUCTURAL |
| | OVERHANGS, ETC.). ELEVATIONS SHOW SOME PROJECTIONS THAT |
| | ARE NOT REFLECTED OR DIMENSIONED IN THE FLOOR PLAN. |
| | [5/4/2018 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 2.) DETAILS IN THE CONCEPT FLOOR PLANS (SHEET A-1.01) |
| | DO NOT MATCH THE DETAILS PROVIDED IN THE REVISED SITE |
| | PLAN (SHEET SP-1). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 3.) LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED BICYCLE RACK SHALL BE |
| | ILLUSTRATED IN THE CONCEPT FLOOR PLANS (SHEET A-1.01). |
| | THIS IS TO ENSURE THE LOCATION OF THE BICYCLE RACK |
| | MEETS THE STANDARDS FOR PLACEMENT NEAR THE PRINCIPAL |
| | ENTRANCE OF THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 4.) THE SQUARE FOOTAGE NUMBERS PROVIDED IN THE |
| | ARCHITECTURAL PLANS DO NOT MATCH THE SQUARE FOOTAGE |
| | NUMBERS PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN (SHEET SP-1). |
| | |
| | |
| | LIGHTING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) STAFF HAS ACKNOWLEDGED THE CONDITION FROM HISTORIC |
| | PRESERVATION THAT NO EXTERIOR LIGHTS WILL BE INSTALLED |
| | FOR THE OUTDOOR COURTS; HOWEVER, WILL THERE BE ANY |
| | LIGHTING PROVIDED ON THE BUILDING AND/OR ELSEWHERE ON |
| | THE PROPERTY? IF SO, WHERE WILL THE FIXTURES BE PLACED? |
| | A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHOWING THE ILLUMINATION OF ANY |
| | LIGHTING ON THE PROPERTY SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 2.) PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY/ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE |
| | SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO |
| | REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY FROM ALL ADJACENT |
| | RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT RESIDENCES OR PUBLIC |
| | THOROUGHFARES. A NOTE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE |
| | PHOTOMETRIC PLAN TO ADDRESS COMPLIANCE. [5/4/2018 |
| | REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | |
| | SIGNAGE COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) AT MINIMUM, THERE SHOULD BE A NOTE PROVIDED IN THE |
| | PLANS STATING THAT "WALL SIGNAGE WILL BE ADDRESSED AT |
| | TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT AND SHALL COMPLY WITH THE SIGN |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF THE RTD DISTRICT PER ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, SECTION 94-149(13)." PLEASE |
| | NOTE THAT PER ZLDR S.94-149(13)(B.), ONLY ONE WALL |
| | SIGN, NOT TO EXCEED THE LESSER OF ONE PERCENT OF GROSS |
| | WALL AREA OR 16 SQ. FT. SHALL BE PERMITTED. ACCORDING |
| | TO THE ELEVATIONAL DRAWINGS, A TOTAL OF TWO (2) SIGNS, |
| | WHICH LOOKS TO EXCEED THE SIGN AREA REQUIREMENTS, HAVE |
| | BEEN PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 2.) DEMONSTRATE THAT THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN WILL |
| | NOT OBSTRUCT VIEW BY ILLUSTRATING THE 20 FT. BY 20 FT. |
| | VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, PURSUANT TO ZLDR S.94-305(E). |
| | |
| | 3.) ARE THERE SUPPOSED TO BE MULTIPLE MONUMENT SIGNS ON |
| | THE PROPERTY? SIGN DETAIL ON SHEET SP-1 SHOWS THAT THE |
| | SIGN DETAIL IS DETAIL "A". PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF |
| | FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 |
| | INCHES X 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 |
| | INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | * CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NOT ADDITIONAL COST. IF |
| | PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE |
| | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED |
| | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE |
| | ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($200.00). |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE |
| | QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
