Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z18030023
Project Number Z18030023
Review Stop Z
Sequence Number 1
Notes
Date Text
2018-05-04 10:43:35GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) PURSUANT TO ZLDR S.94-10, NO APPLICATION WILL BE
 PROCESSED AND NO REVIEWS WILL BE FURTHER CONDUCTED BY
 THE CITY UNTIL THE PROPERTY OWNER HAS CLEARED ALL DEBTS
 TO THE CITY. THERE SEEMS TO BE OUTSTANDING LIENS ON A
 PROPERTY OWNED BY THE APPLICANT.
  
 2.) THE SURVEY SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION IS A COPY
 AND IS OUTDATED (DATED 12/14/16). PLEASE PROVIDE AN
 UPDATED SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY. THE SURVEY MUST BE
 ABSTRACTED, AND SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA
 REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. THE SURVEY MUST ALSO
 ACCURATELY REFLECT WHAT IS EXISTING ON THE PROPERTY AND
 IMMEDIATE SURROUNDING AREAS (I.E. THERE SEEMS TO BE AN
 EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT ON BISCAYNE DRIVE THAT IS NOT
 REFLECTED IN THE SURVEY OR THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE
 PLANS; HOWEVER, IT IS REFLECTED IN THE CIVIL PLANS).
  
 3.) ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS TO BE REVIEWED BY HISTORIC
 FOR COMPATIBILITY. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ELEVATIONS
 SUBMITTED FOR HISTORIC REVIEW DOES NOT MATCH THE
 ELEVATIONS SUBMITTED FOR THE SITE PLAN APPLICATION.
  
 4.) THE PROPOSAL REQUIRES THE APPROVAL OF PB 1751
 (ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF BISCAYNE DRIVE, JUST WEST
 OF THE FEC RAILROAD). PB 1751 IS CURRENTLY PENDING WITH
 THE PLANNING DIVISION, AS THE TURNAROUND ON BISCAYNE
 DRIVE MUST BE RESOLVED TO STAFFS' SATISFACTION PRIOR TO
 THE ABANDONMENT APPLICATION MOVING FORWARD.
  
 5.) ALL PLANS MUST BE CONSISTENT. THERE SEEMS TO BE
 CONFLICTING INFORMATION IN THE PLANS SUBMITTED (I.E.
 SITE/LANDSCAPE PLANS VS. CIVIL PLAN).
  
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.) PLEASE PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE TURNAROUND ON THE
 PROPERTY WHERE THE SITE DEAD ENDS ON BISCAYNE DRIVE.
 THE CURRENT DESIGN WILL HAVE VEHICLES BACKING ONTO A
 PRIVATE RESIDENCE LOCATED IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THE
 PROPERTY. THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE. THE TURNAROUND MUST BE
 PROVIDED ON SITE.
  
 2.) SANITATION COLLECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED ON SITE.
 PLEASE RELOCATE THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE.
  
 3.) THE LOCATION OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE (SHEET SP-1)
 AND THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE NEW LIFT STATION
 (SHEET C1.0) ARE LOCATED IN THE SAME SPOT. PLEASE
 ADDRESS THIS DISCREPANCY.
  
 4.) BICYCLE RACK SHALL BE LOCATED NEAR THE PRINCIPAL
 ENTRANCE OF THE BUILDING. THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE
 RACK IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING AND
 AWAY FROM THE MAIN ENTRANCE. PLEASE RELOCATE THE
 BICYCLE RACK CLOSER TO THE ENTRANCE OF THE BUILDING.
 [ZLDR S.94-485(Q)]
  
 5.) BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN
 THE SITE DATA TABULAR.
  
 6.) THE BICYCLE RACK IN THE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE
 DETAIL PROVIDED AT THE BOTTOM OF SHEET SP-1. PLEASE
 REVISE FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 7.) THE BICYCLE PARKING DETAIL SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH
 THE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY'S BICYCLE
 PARKING GUIDELINES.
  
 8.) BASED ON THE BUILDING SETBACKS PROVIDED IN THE
 PLAN, THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT CANNOT EXCEED 40 FT.
 THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS SHOW THE BUILDING HEIGHT
 EXCEEDING 40 FT. [ZLDR S.94-149(6)]
  
 9.) THERE IS A VEHICULAR TURNAROUND THAT RESEMBLES A
 PARKING SPACE WITHIN THE PARKING AREA. PLEASE CLARIFY.
  
 10.) THERE SEEMS TO BE AN 8 FT. X 15 FT. STRUCTURE
 LOCATED BETWEEN OUTDOOR COURTS 1 AND 2. PLEASE PROVIDE
 A DETAIL OF THIS STRUCTURE.
  
 11.) SHOW THE LOCATION OF ANY MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
 PROVIDED FOR THE PROJECT. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE
 SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW (HEDGE, PARAPET, ETC.).
  
 12.) STRUCTURAL OVERHANGS/DECORATIVE FEATURES SHALL NOT
 PROJECT FARTHER THAN 3 FT. INTO ANY SETBACK. PLEASE
 ILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR S.94-305(A)(20]
  
 13.) IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT A WIDER LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS
 PROVIDED BETWEEN THE OUTDOOR COURTS AND THE ABUTTING
 RESIDENTIAL.
  
 14.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA
 TABULAR: THE CONTROL NUMBER FOR THE PROJECT IS: ISPR
 18-07/Z18030023; INCLUDE PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE
 INFORMATION FOR THE REQUIRED ELEMENTS (I.E. TOTAL
 BUILDING COVERAGE, IMPERVIOUS/PERVIOUS AREA, LANDSCAPE
 AREA, OPEN SPACE AREA, ETC.); BUILDING HEIGHT
 INFORMATION SHOULD INCLUDE THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED
 IN THE DISTRICT AND THE PROPOSED HEIGHT OF THE
 BUILDING; THE NUMBER OF STORIES IS 2 (NOT 1); PARKING
 CALCULATIONS INCORRECT. PLEASE REVISE.
  
 15.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS TABULAR: THE MINIMUM BUILDING SIDE SETBACK
 TO THE WEST SEEMS TO BE 10 FT. (NOT 57.1 FT. AS NOTED
 IN THE PLANS). SETBACK MUST BE MEASURED FROM THE
 CLOSEST POINT OF THE BUILDING TO THE PROPERTY LINE.
 ALSO, PLEASE ADD THE SETBACK DIMENSION IN THE PLAN.
 [ZLDR S.94-149(2)]
  
 16.) REFERENCE THE CODE SECTION FOR THE 0 FT. INTERIOR
 SIDE SETBACK ALLOWANCE FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES
 ABUTTING THE RAILROAD TRACK.
  
  
 LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
  
 1.) A MINIMUM 5 FT. WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER STRIP SHALL
 BE PROVIDED ALONG THE PORTION OF THE EAST PROPERTY LINE
 WHERE THERE IS NO BUILDING AND ABUTS THE RAILROAD ROW.
 [ZLDR S.94-443(B)]
  
 2.) NO TREES/PALMS SHALL BE REMOVED ON THE PROPERTY
 WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT.
  
 3.) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY'S
 LANDSCAPE PLANNER.
  
  
 ARCHITECTURAL (ELEVATIONS AND FLOOR PLAN):
  
 1.) THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS INDICATE THAT THE OVERALL
 HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS 48.5 FT.; HOWEVER,
 THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING CANNOT EXCEED 40 FT., SINCE
 THE MINIMUM BUILDING SIDE SETBACK PROVIDED IS 10 FT.
 FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. [ZLDR S.94-149(6)]
  
 2.) ELEVATIONS AND FLOOR PLAN SHALL BE CONSISTENT
 (INCLUDING ALL ACCESS POINTS INTO THE BUILDING, ETC.).
  
 3.) STRUCTURAL OVERHANGS/DECORATIVE FEATURES SHALL NOT
 PROJECT FARTHER THAN 3 FT. INTO ANY SETBACK. PLEASE
 PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO ILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR
 S.94-305(A)(20]
  
  
 LIGHTING PLAN:
  
 1.) A LIGHTING PLAN WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE APPLICATION
 PACKET. PLEASE PROVIDE A LIGHTING PLAN WITH THE
 RESUBMITTAL.
  
 2.) PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE
 SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO
 REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY FROM ALL ADJACENT
 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC
 THOROUGHFARES. [ZLDR S.94-309(A)]
  
  
 SIGNAGE:
  
 1.) WALL SIGN DETAIL REQUIRED. WALL SIGNAGE SHALL
 COMPLY WITH THE SIGN REQUIREMENTS OF THE RTD DISTRICT.
 [ZLDR S.94-149(13)]
  
 2.) ONLY ONE (1) WALL SIGN IS PERMITTED, NOT TO EXCEED
 THE LESSER OF 1% OF GROSS WALL AREA OR 16 SQ. FT. [ZLDR
 S.94-149(13) B.]
  
 3.) THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN IS NOT PERMITTED IN THE
 RTD DISTRICT. PLEASE ADDRESS THE INCONSISTENCIES WITH
 THE NUMBER OF SIGN FACES, SIGN HEIGHT AND SIGN WIDTH.
 ZONING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR A MONUMENT SIGN IN THE RTD
 DISTRICT ARE PROVIDED IN ZLDR S.94-149(13) A.
  
 4.) THE MONUMENT SIGN SHALL BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF 10
 FT. FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. [ZLDR S.94-149(13) A.]
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF
 FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5
 INCHES X 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17
 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE
 NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT
 IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
  
  
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved