| Date |
Text |
| 2018-07-09 16:29:19 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE |
| | 7/3/18 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE: |
| | |
| | 1. THE INTENT OF MOVING THE HIGH POINT OF THE DRIVEWAYS |
| | TOWARD THE PROPERTY LINE IS TO MAXIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF |
| | RUNOFF DRAINING TO THE ONSITE STORMWATER TREATMENT |
| | SYSTEM (EXFILTRATION TRENCHES) AS WELL AS LIMIT THE |
| | VOLUME OF UNCONTROLLED RUNOFF FROM THE SITE. [REFER TO |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT NO. 5] |
| | |
| | 2. THE STORM PIPES ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING ARE |
| | NOT SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 3. THERE APPEARS TO BE A CONFLICT BETWEEN PIPE STORM2 |
| | (18? HDPE WITH INVERT ELEVATION 7.00 FT NAVD) AND PIPE |
| | SAN 5 (6? PVC WITH INVERT ELEVATION BETWEEN 8.02 FEET |
| | AND 7.61 FEET NAVD). |
| | |
| | 4. GENERAL NOTE #8 ON SHEET C8 IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE |
| | DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS AND CALLOUT NOTES IN PLAN VIEW ON |
| | THE SHEET. REVISE THE GENERAL NOTE TO READ ?? PROVIDE |
| | 78 LF OF 6 FEET WIDE ?? INSTEAD OF ?? PROVIDE 78 LF OF |
| | 4 FEET WIDE ?? |
| | |
| | 5. INDICATE WHERE THE STORMWATER CONTROL STRUCTURE IS |
| | LOCATED TO CREATE A HYDRAULIC HEAD OF 4.5 FEET (H2) |
| | (HGL ELEVATION 10.92 FEET NAVD 1988) ASSUMED IN THE |
| | EXFILTRATION TRENCH CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 6. DETAIL ST-8 ON SHEET C13 WAS MODIFIED TO SHOW THE |
| | PIPE SIZE TO BE 12? HDPE. THE STORM STRUCTURE TABLE ON |
| | SHEET C8 SHOWS THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH PIPE DIAMETER TO |
| | BE 18? HDPE. |
| | |
| | 7. SHEET C1 AND THE DRAINAGE SUMMARY REFERS TO AN OLD |
| | FEMA FIRM AND FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION. FEMA ISSUED NEW |
| | FIRMS IN OCTOBER 2017. REFER TO THE SURVEY FOR THE NEW |
| | PANEL NUMBER. |
| | |
| | 8. REVISE THE SR# LISTED WITH THE SPEED LIMIT ON SHEET |
| | C1. |
| | |
| | 9. PLEASE DATE THE DRAINAGE SUMMARY. |
| | |
| |
Print |
