| Date |
Text |
| 2018-04-25 10:31:05 | Z18020021 & Z18020023 THE MARINA CMPD |
| | 1ST RESUBMITTAL |
| | |
| | TRAFFIC STATEMENT (DATED MARCH 29, 2018) COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | - THE TRIP GENERATION CALCULATION APPEARS TO BE CORRECT |
| | BUT THE RATES INCLUDED IN THE TRAFFIC STATEMENT ARE |
| | NOT. PER PALM BEACH COUNTY?S TRIP GENERATION RATE |
| | INFORMATION, DAILY RATE SHOULD BE 152.03 TRIPS PER |
| | 1,000 S.F., AND PM RATE SHOULD BE 12.81 TRIPS PER 1,000 |
| | S.F. FOR 10,000 S.F. OR LESS. RETAIL PASS-BY % SHOULD |
| | BE 62% FOR 10,000 S.F. OR LESS. |
| | - INCLUDE DAILY PASS-BY TRIPS AS DAILY DRIVEWAY VOLUMES |
| | SHOWN IN FIGURE 1. THE DAILY DRIVEWAY VOLUMES SUM UP TO |
| | THE NET PROPOSED TRIPS ONLY BUT NOT THE TOTAL DRIVEWAY |
| | VOLUMES SHOWN IN TABLE 2. |
| | - PROVIDE FINAL SIGNED AND SEALED TRAFFIC STATEMENT. |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN (RECEIVED ON APRIL 18, 2018) COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | - PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 20-14, INCLUDE IN THE |
| | APPLICATION THE STREETSCAPE DESIGN, INCLUDING BUT NOT |
| | LIMITED TO LANDSCAPING AND SIDEWALKS/BIKE PATHS, ON THE |
| | EAST AND WEST SIDE OF NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE. PLEASE |
| | COORDINATE WITH ENGINEERING ON THE STREETSCAPE DESIGN. |
| | THE STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENT SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR |
| | TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY |
| | FOR THE PROPOSED PBA DEVELOPMENT. THIS COMMENT WAS |
| | ACKNOWLEDGED IN THE RESPONSE BUT NO STREETSCAPE DESIGN |
| | IS PROVIDED FOR THE EAST AND WEST SIDES OF NORTH |
| | FLAGLER DRIVE. |
| | - SWAP THE LOCATIONS OF THE TURNAROUND AREA AND THE |
| | LAST PARKING SPACE PRIOR TO THE RESIDENTIAL ACCESS |
| | GATE. |
| | - SOME OF THE DIMENSIONS IN THE CIVIL PLAN ARE |
| | DIFFERENT THAN THE SITE PLAN, AND THE SIDEWALK DESIGN |
| | IS SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT BETWEEN THE TWO SETS OF PLANS. |
| | FOR EXAMPLE, IN SHEETS A1.01 AND C4.00, THE DROP OFF |
| | AREAS TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE BUILDING ARE |
| | INDICATED WITH WIDTHS OF 19?-9? AND 18? RESPECTIVELY IN |
| | THE SITE PLAN, BUT IS SHOWN AS 18? AND 20? RESPECTIVELY |
| | IN THE CIVIL PLAN; AND THE INTERNAL ROADWAY WIDTH TO |
| | THE SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY IS SHOWN AS 25?-2? IN THE |
| | SITE PLAN BUT IS SHOWN AS 24? IN THE CIVIL PLAN. PLEASE |
| | REVISE. |
| | - THE INTERNAL ROADWAY COULD BE REDUCED TO 24? WIDE AND |
| | THE DROP OFF AREA COULD BE REDUCED TO 18? WIDE TO |
| | MAXIMIZE THE SIDEWALK WIDTH, WHICH COULD ALLOW A |
| | MINIMUM OF 6? SIDEWALKS AND PREFERABLY 8? TO 10? |
| | SIDEWALKS BE PROVIDED. ALSO, INCREASE THE WIDTH OF THE |
| | SIDEWALKS/PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS WHICH RUN DIAGONALLY |
| | ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. |
| | - PROVIDE FINAL SIGNED AND SEALED CIVIL PLAN. |
| | |
| | ERIK D. FERGUSON, PE |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
