| Date |
Text |
| 2018-04-26 15:44:55 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 |
| | PROJECT: THE MARINA CMPD Z18020023 |
| | APRIL 26, 2018 |
| | |
| | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND |
| | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE UPDATE THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN |
| | SHOWING THE CHANGES PROPOSED WITH THIS PETITION |
| | BUBBLED, AND AMEND TO MEET CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS |
| | FOR MITIGATION OF 1:1 REPLACEMENT FOR TREE CANOPY BELOW |
| | 20 FEET DIAMETER, AND SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR TREES 20 FEET |
| | OR MORE IN DIAMETER. |
| | |
| | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A MITIGATION CHART |
| | SHOWING THE APPROVED MITIGATION QUANTITY AND THE TREE |
| | MITIGATION PROVIDED WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN |
| | WITH THIS PETITION. |
| | |
| | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE OPEN SPACE PERCENTAGE AND |
| | LANDSCAPE AREA PERCENTAGE FOR PBA#1, #2 AND #3, AND |
| | SHOW COMPARISON TO WHAT IS CURRENTLY APPROVED. |
| | |
| | 4. SATISFIED. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE FRONTAGE ROAD |
| | DOES NOT MEET THE DESIGN GUIDELINES CROSS SECTION 6 |
| | UNDER VII C. FRONTAGE ROAD. PLEASE REVISE. |
| | |
| | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE REQUIRED SHADE TREE, |
| | FLOWERING TREE AND SHRUB QUANTITIES FOR THE SITE PER |
| | CURRENT CODE SECTION 94-442 (B)(2). ADJUST SUBSTITUTION |
| | OF PALMS TO CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENT OF 3:1 FOR COCONUT |
| | PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES, UNLESS AN EXCEPTION PER THE |
| | DESIGN GUIDELINES. |
| | |
| | 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY |
| | REQUIREMENTS CHART TO CURRENT CODE AND PROVIDE 40 |
| | POINTS AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE THE WIDTH OF ALL |
| | INDIVIDUAL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, AND |
| | SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH BUFFER REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION XI- |
| | D. OF THE DESIGN GUIDELINES. SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR EACH |
| | BUFFER AND INCLUDE ANY APPLICATION OF PALM SUBSTITUTION |
| | PER XII G. |
| | |
| | 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE LIST OF SHRUBS BY |
| | SPECIES, QUANTITY AND SIZE. INCLUDE DROUGHT TOLERANCE |
| | LEVEL FOR EACH PLANT SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST AND IF |
| | NATIVE. |
| | |
| | 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE CALCULATION FOR PBA #2 |
| | AND PBA #3 SEPARATELY FOR XII E. FOUNDATION PLANTING. |
| | |
| | 10. SATISFIED. THE PROMENADE IS VERY PLAIN. PLEASE |
| | REVISE THE PLAN TO INCORPORATE MORE INTEREST PER THE |
| | DESIGN GUIDELINES SUCH AS A MEANDERING WALKWAY WITH |
| | LANDSCAPING AND RESTING SPACES INTERACTING WITH THE |
| | WALKWAY. |
| | |
| | 11. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND |
| | MOUNTED EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C |
| | UNITS, ETC., AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND |
| | MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. WATER BACKFLOW |
| | PREVENTERS ARE NOT CLEARLY SHOWN IN FINAL LOCATIONS. |
| | |
| | 12. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL WATER, |
| | SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS AND |
| | RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. |
| | |
| | 13. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT |
| | BARRIERS TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM |
| | CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, |
| | SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT |
| | COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS. |
| | |
| | COMMENTS 11, 12, AND 13. THERE ARE MULTIPLE CONFLICTS |
| | WITH TREES AND NEW UTILITIES, AND MANY TREES HAVE BEEN |
| | REMOVED FROM THE PLAN ALONG THE CENTER BUFFER OF THE |
| | FRONTAGE ROAD TO ACCOMMODATE UTILITY VALVES REDUCING |
| | THE BUFFERING INTENDED IN THE DESIGN GUIDELINES. THERE |
| | ARE MULTIPLE TREES THAT DO NOT HAVE ADEQUATE SPACING OR |
| | ROOT BARRIER TO PROTECT UTILITIES. THE ROOT BARRIER |
| | PLAN L1-120 AND DETAILS L5-110 ARE FOR SIDEWALKS ONLY, |
| | NOT UTILITIES. |
| | |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/26/18: |
| | 14. THE ADJUSTMENT TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES REDUCING |
| | THE REQUIRED ADDITIONAL TREES PER UNIT FROM THE CODE |
| | REQUIREMENT MAY NOT BE SUPPORTED BY STAFF. SUPPLEMENT |
| | 33 TO THE ZLDR?S SECTION 94-443(D) APPROVED THROUGH |
| | ORDINANCE 4493-13 REQUIRES ONE ADDITIONAL TREE PER |
| | DWELLING UNIT. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING ONE |
| | ADDITIONAL TREE PER 4 UNITS RESULTING IN 300 LESS TREES |
| | THAN REQUIRED BY CODE, SO REQUIRES A WAIVER REQUEST. |
| | THIS WOULD AFFECT ALL FUTURE PBA?S WITH MULTIPLE |
| | RESIDENTIAL UNITS. |
| | |
| | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL |
| | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON |
| | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. |
| | |
| | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE |
| | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE |
| | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND |
| | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. |
| | |
| | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE |
| | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF |
| | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO THE |
| | PROPERTY. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE |
| | AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. |
| | |
| |
Print |
