| Date |
Text |
| 2018-03-15 08:48:02 | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 03.14.2018 |
| | PROJECT NO.: Z18020021 & Z18020023 |
| | CASE NO.: PB 1445FF & 1445GG |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. APPROVED SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 2. SITE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE A NORTH ARROW AND GRAPHIC |
| | SCALE. |
| | |
| | 3. THE PROPERTY LINE SHOULD BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED WITH |
| | A DIFFERENT LINE TYPE/COLOR/WEIGHT. A PORTION OF THE |
| | PROPERTY LINE IS SHOWN AS A RED DASHED LINE, WHILE |
| | OTHER PORTIONS ARE THE SAME LINE WEIGHT/COLOR AS EVERY |
| | OTHER LINE. |
| | |
| | 4. DIMENSIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE DRIVEWAY AT THE |
| | SOUTH END OF THE PROJECT, BETWEEN RYBOVICH AND THE TRG |
| | PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 5. THERE SHOULD BE A DOOR FROM THE BIKE PARKING SPACE |
| | TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING, WITHOUT HAVING TO GO |
| | THROUGH THE PARKING GARAGE. |
| | |
| | 6. THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PROVIDED DOES NOT APPEAR TO |
| | ACCOUNT FOR THE ACTIVE USE SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT IS |
| | PROPOSED ALONG THE FRONTAGE ROAD. |
| | |
| | 7. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD INCLUDE LABELS AND DETAILS OF |
| | ALL FENCING, WALL, ETC.; HEIGHTS SHALL BE IDENTIFIED. |
| | |
| | 8. DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE TRASH ENCLOSURE |
| | SOUTH OF THE OFFICE/OUTDOOR DINING AREA. |
| | |
| | 9. THE PARKING STALL DETAIL SHOULD MATCH THE CITY?S |
| | STANDARD DETAIL; PLEASE EMAIL ME FOR A COPY. AN |
| | ADDITIONAL DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED SHOWING HOW THE |
| | STRIPING WILL BE ACCOMMODATED AROUND OR NEAR THE |
| | STRUCTURAL COLUMNS IN THE GARAGE. |
| | |
| | 10. IS THERE A REASON WHY THE GARAGE IS SHOWN AS |
| | ONE-WAY? THE ARROWS INDICATE ONE-WAY, BUT STOP BARS ARE |
| | SHOWN ON BOTH SIDES OF THE GARAGE, ETC. |
| | |
| | 11. PLEASE VERIFY THE LOCATION OF THE STOP BARS, |
| | PARTICULARLY AT THE EXITS OF THE PARKING GARAGE. I |
| | BELIEVE THE BAR SHOULD BE RELOCATED, OR A SECOND BAR |
| | ADDED, BEFORE THE CROSSWALK. |
| | |
| | 12. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD INCLUDE ALL OF THE PAVEMENT |
| | MARKINGS THAT ARE SHOWN ON SHEET C4.00. |
| | |
| | 13. PLEASE PROVIDE TURNING ANALYSIS FOR THE |
| | LOADING/UNLOADING AND TRASH PICK-UP INSIDE THE GARAGE. |
| | |
| | 14. BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE EXTERIOR |
| | OF THE BUILDING NEAR EACH OF THE ELEMENTS THAT IS OPEN |
| | TO THE PUBLIC OR WOULD OTHERWISE BE ACCESSED BY SOMEONE |
| | WHO DOES NOT HAVE ACCESS TO THE INTERNAL BIKE STORAGE |
| | AREA. |
| | |
| | 15. A DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE PROPOSED BIKE |
| | RACK, INCLUDING SIZE, STYLE, DIMENSIONS OF THE AREA |
| | SURROUNDING, ETC. |
| | |
| | 16. TURN AROUND SPACES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT PARKING |
| | ROWS THAT HAVE A DEAD END, SUCH AS UNDER THE RAMP ON |
| | THE GROUND FLOOR AND ON THE TOP LEVEL OF THE GARAGE. |
| | |
| | 17. DIMENSION ALL PARKING ROWS AND DRIVE AISLES. |
| | |
| | 18. PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION SHOULD BE MADE FROM THE SOUTH |
| | LOBBY ENTRANCE TO THE PUBLIC PROMENADE TO THE EAST, |
| | WITHOUT HAVING TO CROSS LANDSCAPING. |
| | |
| | 19. POOLS SHALL BE ENCLOSED BY A FENCE OR SIMILAR |
| | STRUCTURE THAT IS AT LEAST FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT. |
| | ACCESS TO THE POOL SHOULD BE THROUGH A BUILDING OR |
| | THROUGH A SELF-CLOSING AND SELF-LATCHING GATE WITH |
| | LATCHES AT LEAST 54 INCHES ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF THE |
| | GATE. |
| | |
| | 20. THE DATA ON SHEET A0.02 INDICATE THAT THERE ARE 199 |
| | DWELLING UNITS IN PBA 2 AND 200 DWELLING UNITS IN PBA |
| | 3; THE DESIGN GUIDELINES HAVE THIS INFORMATION |
| | REVERSED. |
| | |
| | 21. PLEASE PROVIDE A DIMENSION FROM THE NORTH PROPERTY |
| | LINE TO THE NORTHERN ROADWAY; THE MINIMUM BUFFER SHALL |
| | BE AT LEAST FIVE (5) FEET IN WIDTH. |
| | |
| | 22. THE MASSING DIAGRAM ON PAGE 18 OF THE DESIGN |
| | GUIDELINES NEEDS TO BE REVISED TO ACCURATELY REFLECT |
| | THE NEW MAXIMUM GROSS FLOOR AREAS. |
| | |
| | 23. PURSUANT TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES, SHOWER/CHANGING |
| | FACILITIES SHALL BE PROVIDE FOR EMPLOYEES OF ALL |
| | NON-RESIDENTIAL USES WITHIN THE CMPD. PLEASE INDICATE |
| | HOW THIS IS WILL BE PROVIDED FOR THE ACTIVE USES |
| | PROPOSED ON THE FRONTAGE ROAD. |
| | |
| | 24. PURSUANT TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES, A SITE PLAN |
| | APPLICATION SHALL INCLUDE A PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN |
| | THAT DEMONSTRATES THE PROVISION OF SUFFICIENT PARKING |
| | AND SUFFICIENT VEHICULAR, PEDESTRIAN AND EMERGENCY |
| | VEHICLE ACCESS FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC AS WELL AS |
| | ALL BUILDINGS REMAINING IN OPERATION DURING THE |
| | DEMOLITION/CONSTRUCTION FOR THE PROPOSED BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 25. PURSUANT TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES, THERE IS TO BE A |
| | MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) FEET OF FOUNDATION PLANTING ALONG |
| | THE WEST FA?ADE OF THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 26. PURSUANT TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES THE DESIGN OF THE |
| | FRONTAGE ROAD IS TO INCLUDE PEDESTRIAN ELEMENTS SUCH AS |
| | BENCHES, TRASH CAN, FOUNTAINS, PUBLIC ART, ETC. |
| | |
| | 27. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION PERTAINING OT THE |
| | PROPOSED GREEN WALLS ON THE GROUND FLOOR, ON THE WEST |
| | FA?ADE OF THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 28. VERIFICATION FROM THE PROJECT ARCHITECT SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE BUILDING WILL BE AT LEAST |
| | BRONZE LEVEL ON THE ICC 700 2012 NATIONAL GREEN |
| | BUILDING STANDARDS IN EFFECT AS OF JANUARY 1, 2014 AND |
| | INCORPORATE ALL OF THE GREEN INITIATIVES OUTLINED IN |
| | THE DESIGN GUIDELINES. |
| | |
| | 29. PARKING FOR THE ACTIVE USES ALONG THE FRONTAGE ROAD |
| | TO NOT APPEAR TO BE INCLUDED IN THE CALCULATIONS, |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY. PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR |
| | NON-RESIDENTIAL USES ARE OUTLINED IN THE DESIGN |
| | GUIDELINES. |
| | |
| | 30. STAFF NEEDS CLARIFICATION REGARDING THE PROPOSED |
| | NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES AND THE CONFIGURATION OF THE |
| | GARAGE, ETC. PLEASE CONTACT FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION. |
| | |
| | 31. PLEASE CLARIFY THE DETAIL OF THE PROPOSED WALKWAY |
| | EXTENDING INTO THE INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY. IS THE |
| | DOCKING OF BOATS GOING TO BE PERMITTED? IF SO, ARE THE |
| | SLIPS FOR RESIDENTS ONLY? ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
| | REGARDING THIS ELEMENT MAY GENERATE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS |
| | DEPENDING UPON THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CITY?S |
| | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 32. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THE METAL PANELS |
| | (BEHIND THE CABLE RAILS) INSIDE OF THE PARKING GARAGE. |
| | PURSUANT TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES, THESE PANELS SHALL |
| | BE AT LEAST 3 FEET 6 INCHES IN HEIGHT. |
| | |
| | 33. THERE WAS SOME COMMENTS BY STAFF THAT THE PROPOSED |
| | DESIGN ELEMENTS FOR THE PARKING GARAGE SEEMED A LITTLE |
| | OUT OF CONTEXT WITH THE REST OF THE RESIDENTIAL TOWER |
| | AND THOUGHT THAT THEY COULD BE BETTER INTEGRATED. |
| | |
| | 34. IS THE GARAGE PROPOSED TO BE GATED? THERE NEEDS TO |
| | BE DISCUSSIONS WITH STAFF REGARDING OPERATION OF THE |
| | GARAGE, STACKING, GUEST ACCESS, ACCESS TO PARKING BY |
| | PATRONS OF THE NON-RESIDENTIAL USES, ETC. |
| | |
| | 35. IS LIGHTING PROPOSED? A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 36. IS SIGNAGE PROPOSED AS PART OF THE ACTIVE USES |
| | ALONG THE FRONTAGE ROAD? |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X |
| | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE MAY 15, 2018, |
| | PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE |
| | SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED |
| | DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN MARCH 30, 2018. |
| | |
| | G) TO BE PLACED ON THE MAY 15, 2018, PLANNING BOARD |
| | AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER |
| | THAN APRIL 30, 2018. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM AND BE |
| | INSTALLED WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZONING |
| | AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AS ALSO PROVIDED IN |
| | THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED |
| | AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED |
| | ABOVE. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | P: 561.822.1448 |
| | F: 561.822.1460 |
| | |
| | E: [email protected] |
| | |
| | W: WPB.ORG |
| | |
| |
Print |
