| Date |
Text |
| 2018-04-18 14:31:09 | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 04.18.2018 |
| | PROJECT NO.: Z18010012 |
| | CASE NO.: PB 1693C |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. BUILDING #1 IS SHOWN ENCROACHING INTO THE SOUTH |
| | DIXIE HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY AND DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE |
| | MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. - PLEASE CLARIFY YOUR |
| | RESPONSE OF "SEEKING A TRANSFER OF THE PARCEL FROM THE |
| | CITY..." THERE HAVE BEEN NO DISCUSSIONS WITH STAFF |
| | REGARDING THIS AND WHETHER OR NOT THE CITY AGREES WITH |
| | THE APPLICANT'S POSITION REGARDING THE PROPERTIES |
| | STATUS/DISPOSITION. DISCUSSIONS NEED TO OCCUR BETWEEN |
| | THE APPLICANT AND VARIOUS CITY STAFF REGARDING THIS |
| | MATTER TO ENSURE THAT ALL PARTIES ARE ON THE SAME PAGE. |
| | THIS DETERMINES WHETHER OR NOT THE PROJECT (AS |
| | CURRENTLY DESIGNED) COMPLIES WITH THE MINIMUM SETBACK |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 2. STAFF HAS CONCERNS WITH THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS: |
| | |
| | C. THE PROPOSED INGRESS/EGRESS POINT ON HAMPTON ROAD, |
| | ADJACENT TO RAILROAD TRACKS AND THE POTENTIAL IMPACT TO |
| | THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE WEST. - WE WOULD |
| | LIKE TO HEAR WHAT THE FEEDBACK FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD |
| | WILL BE ON THIS ISSUE. |
| | |
| | D. PARKING CALCULATION UTILIZING RETAIL USES ONLY. HOW |
| | WILL RESTAURANT USES BE ACCOUNTED FOR? WILL THERE BE A |
| | PROHIBITION ON RESTAURANT USES? WILL A MONITORING TABLE |
| | BE REQUIRED? - THE SITE PLAN STILL REFERENCES THE |
| | "SHARED PARKING TABLE" UNDER THE "PARKING PROVIDED" |
| | PORTION OF THE SITE DATA TABLE. |
| | |
| | 3. TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY APPROVAL SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM |
| | PALM BEACH COUNTY. |
| | |
| | 6. WILL A LIST OF PERMITTED/PROHIBITED USES BE |
| | DEVELOPED FOR THE CPD? - THE PROPOSED LIST OF USES |
| | INCLUDE RESTAURANTS; PLEASEE REFER TO COMMENT #2D ABOVE |
| | REGARDING THE IMPACT ON THE PARKING IF RESTAURANT USES |
| | ARE ALLOWED. |
| | |
| | 8. THE PRE-APPLICATION LETTER FROM FDOT INDICATES 4,500 |
| | SQUARE FEET OF RESTAURANT USE, BUT THIS IS NOT |
| | INDICATED ANYWHERE ELSE ON THE SITE PLAN, ETC. PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY AND ENSURE THAT ALL PROPOSALS ARE CONSISTENT. - |
| | WHAT IS THE STATUS OF GETTING THE REVISED LETTER FROM |
| | FDOT? |
| | |
| | 13. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE FAR WAS CALCULATED. FAR |
| | INCLUDES AIR-CONDITIONED OR FULLY ENCLOSED STORAGE |
| | SPACES, ENCLOSED AREAS ON THE ROOFTOP SUCH AS BATHROOMS |
| | AND LOBBIES, STAIRS AND ELEVATOR AREAS, AND EXTERNAL |
| | UNENCLOSED CIRCULATION AREAS. THE FAR CALCULATION SHALL |
| | NOT INCLUDE PARKING AREAS; UNENCLOSED COLONNADES, |
| | PORCHES AND BALCONIES; MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL |
| | SPACES; TRASH ROOMS; AND STORAGE SPACES WITHOUT WINDOWS |
| | AND ENCLOSED BY SURFACES THAT ALLOW FOR NATURAL |
| | VENTILATION OR OUTSIDE AIR CIRCULATION. THE FLOOR AREA |
| | SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE OUTSIDE FACE OF EXTERIOR |
| | WALLS. - THE FAR ON THE SITE PLAN (DATED 3/22/18) |
| | INDICATES THAT THE FAR IS 0.57. PURSUANT TO THE ZONING |
| | AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THE FAR NEEDS TO |
| | INCLUDE THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS. IT IS MY |
| | UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS HAS ALREADY BEEN ADDRESSED, BUT |
| | WAS NOT DONE UNTIL AFTER THE 3/22/18 SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 15. BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE MIXED-USE |
| | BUILDINGS ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY. - STAFF RECOGNIZES |
| | THAT BIKE STORAGE HAS BEEN PROVIDED FOR |
| | RESIDENTS/TENANTS, BUT BIKE RACKS NEED TO BE PROVIDED |
| | THROUGHOUT THE NON-RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE SITE SO |
| | THAT THEY CAN BE UTILIZED BY PATRONS OF THE |
| | NON-RESIDENTIAL USES. |
| | |
| | 18. HOW WILL SIGNAGE BE ADDRESSED WITHIN THE PLANNED |
| | DEVELOPMENT? - NO SIGN PROGRAM IS BEING DEVELOPED? IF |
| | NOT, THEN ALL SIGNAGE WILL BE REGULATED BY THE GENERAL |
| | COMMERCIAL (GC) PROVISIONS OF THE CITY'S SIGN CODE. |
| | |
| | 20. THE TRASH COMPACTOR AT THE SOUTH END OF THE |
| | PROPERTY SEEMS LIKE IT WOULD BE DIFFICULT TO |
| | LOAD/UNLOAD. THE TURNING MOVEMENTS SHOWN ON SHEET C6.00 |
| | DON?T SEEM CONDUCIVE TO ACTUALLY PICKING IT UP. THE |
| | GATE CONFIGURATION APPEARS TO CONFLICT WITH THE |
| | MOVEMENTS AS WELL. - THE REVISED LOCATION OF THE |
| | DUMPSTER REQUIRES THE OPENING OF BOTH (IN-BOUND AND |
| | OUT-BOUND) GATES; PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THIS WILL |
| | FUNCTION. |
| | |
| | 29. HAS ANY COORDINATION BEEN MADE WITH THE SCHOOL |
| | DISTRICT WITH REGARD TO THE PROVISION OF SCHOOL BUS |
| | PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AND HOW THAT WOULD OCCUR WITHIN THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT? - PLEASE PROVIDE AN UPDATE. |
| | |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 31. TURN-AROUND SPACES NEED TO BE PROVIDED BEFORE THE |
| | GATES. |
| | |
| | 32. NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH NEEDS TO OCCUR BEFORE |
| | SCHEDULING OR NOTIFICATION OF ANY PUBLIC HEARING (I.E. |
| | PLANNING BOARD). RESIDENT COMMENTS FROM THE OUTREACH |
| | MEETINGS NEEDS TO BE CONSIDERED AND POTENTIALLY |
| | INCORPORATED INTO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X |
| | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE JUNE 19, 2018, |
| | PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE |
| | SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED |
| | DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN MAY 12, 2018. |
| | |
| | G) TO BE PLACED ON THE JUNE 19, 2018, PLANNING BOARD |
| | AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER |
| | THAN JUNE 4, 2018. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM AND BE |
| | INSTALLED WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZONING |
| | AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AS ALSO PROVIDED IN |
| | THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED |
| | AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED |
| | ABOVE. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | P: 561.822.1448 |
| | F: 561.822.1460 |
| | |
| | E: [email protected] |
| | |
| | W: WPB.ORG |
| | |
| |
Print |
