| Date |
Text |
| 2018-02-14 12:15:19 | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 02.14.2018 |
| | PROJECT NO.: Z18010012 |
| | CASE NO.: PB 1693C |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. BUILDING #1 IS SHOWN ENCROACHING INTO THE SOUTH |
| | DIXIE HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY AND DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE |
| | MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 2. STAFF HAS CONCERNS WITH THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS: |
| | |
| | A. THE PROPOSED SURFACE PARKING LOT ON DIXIE HIGHWAY |
| | AND THE ABSENCE OF A MIXED-USE BUILDING IN THIS |
| | LOCATION. |
| | |
| | B. THE GATING OFF OF THE RESIDENTIAL PARKING AND ITS |
| | IMPACT ON CIRCULATION PATTERNS. |
| | |
| | C. THE PROPOSED INGRESS/EGRESS POINT ON HAMPTON ROAD, |
| | ADJACENT TO RAILROAD TRACKS AND THE POTENTIAL IMPACT TO |
| | THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE WEST. |
| | |
| | D. PARKING CALCULATION UTILIZING RETAIL USES ONLY. HOW |
| | WILL RESTAURANT USES BE ACCOUNTED FOR? WILL THERE BE A |
| | PROHIBITION ON RESTAURANT USES? WILL A MONITORING TABLE |
| | BE REQUIRED? |
| | |
| | E. THE PROVISION AND DESIGN OF THE GROUND-FLOOR |
| | RESIDENTIAL USES IN BUILDING #3. |
| | |
| | F. THE PROPOSED WAIVER REQUESTS, ESPECIALLY THOSE THAT |
| | CONSIST OF REDUCED LANDSCAPE BUFFERS BETWEEN THE |
| | RIGHT-OF-WAY AND SURFACE PARKING LOTS. SOME OF THE |
| | BUFFERS ARE EVEN ENCROACHED ON BY THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK, |
| | RESULTING FROM THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ON-STREET |
| | PARKING. |
| | |
| | G. THE FUNCTIONALITY AND THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED |
| | NON-RESIDENTIAL PARKING AND ITS PROXIMITY (OR LACK |
| | THEREOF) TO THE NON-RESIDENTIAL USES. |
| | |
| | H. THE CONFIGURATION OF THE VISITOR LANE AND ITS |
| | ACCESSIBILITY. |
| | |
| | I. THE WIDTH OF THE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS ALONG THE |
| | SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY FRONTAGE. GIVEN THE NATURE OF THE |
| | PROPOSED USES, THE WALKWAY SHOULD PROVIDE SUFFICIENT |
| | CLEARANCE. IN SOME INSTANCES THE PROPOSED WALKWAY IS |
| | ONLY 5 FEET IN WIDTH (OR LESS), ESPECIALLY UNDER THE |
| | ARCADE. |
| | |
| | J. HOW IS THE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED TO COMPLY WITH THE |
| | LOADING SPACE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE NON-RESIDENTIAL |
| | USES, ALONG WITH THE FUNCTIONALITY OF SOLID WASTE |
| | DISPOSAL. |
| | |
| | K. ARE THE RETAILS SPACES AT THE NORTH AND SOUTH ENDS |
| | OF BUILDINGS # AND #2, AND THE SOUTH END OF BUILDING |
| | #3, PROPOSED TO BE A SINGLE TENANT, OR SPLIT INTO |
| | MULTIPLE TENANT BAYS? IF MULTIPLE TENANTS ARE PROPOSED, |
| | THEN THERE IS NO ACCESS TO THE WESTERN HALF OF THESE |
| | SPACES. |
| | |
| | 3. TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY APPROVAL SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM |
| | PALM BEACH COUNTY. |
| | |
| | 4. SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION SHALL BE |
| | OBTAINED FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT |
| | |
| | 5. PLEASE INDICATE HOW THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN WOULD |
| | WORK IN COORDINATION WITH THE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT |
| | AND HOW IT WOULD SATISFY THE CONDITIONS OF THE |
| | PRE-APPLICATION LETTER. STAFF DOES HAVE CONCERNS |
| | REGARDING FDOT?S REQUIREMENT OF INSTALLING A RIGHT TURN |
| | LANE |
| | |
| | 6. WILL A LIST OF PERMITTED/PROHIBITED USES BE |
| | DEVELOPED FOR THE CPD? |
| | |
| | 7. THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES THE PROVISION |
| | OF DEDICATED PARKING FOR RIDE SHARE; PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | MORE INFORMATION. WHERE ARE THE SPACES PROPOSED TO BE |
| | LOCATED? THESE SPACES SHOULD NOT BE COUNTED TOWARD THE |
| | OVERALL PARKING REQUIREMENT. COORDINATION SHOULD BE |
| | MADE WITH THE CITY?S REPRESENTATIVE FOR SOUTH FLORIDA |
| | COMMUTER SERVICES. |
| | |
| | 8. THE PRE-APPLICATION LETTER FROM FDOT INDICATES 4,500 |
| | SQUARE FEET OF RESTAURANT USE, BUT THIS IS NOT |
| | INDICATED ANYWHERE ELSE ON THE SITE PLAN, ETC. PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY AND ENSURE THAT ALL PROPOSALS ARE CONSISTENT. |
| | |
| | 9. THE LIST OF ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET OF |
| | THE PROPERTY SHALL BE PROVIDED, AS OBTAINED FROM THE |
| | PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER |
| | |
| | 10. A SIGNED/NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | REGARDING OBTAINING THE MAILING LIST (SEE PAGE 20 OF |
| | THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION) |
| | |
| | 11. THE SITE PLAN IS UNCLEAR AS TO THE ULTIMATE OUTLINE |
| | OF THE MIXED-USE BUILDINGS, ESPECIALLY WITH REGARD TO |
| | BUILDING #3 (DOES THIS BUILDING HAVE AN ARCADE LIKE |
| | THAT WHICH IS SHOWN FOR BUILDINGS #1 AND #2) |
| | |
| | 12. PERVIOUS PAVERS SHOULD NOT BE COUNTED AS LANDSCAPE |
| | AREA. CONSIDERATION COULD BE MADE IN THEIR CALCULATION |
| | TOWARD IMPERVIOUS SURFACE, BUT THEY SHOULD NOT BE |
| | LANDSCAPE AREA. IF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT |
| | MEET THE 20% MINIMUM LANDSCAPE AREA (WITHOUT PAVERS), |
| | THEN A WAIVER SHALL BE REQUESTED. |
| | |
| | 13. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE FAR WAS CALCULATED. FAR |
| | INCLUDES AIR-CONDITIONED OR FULLY ENCLOSED STORAGE |
| | SPACES, ENCLOSED AREAS ON THE ROOFTOP SUCH AS BATHROOMS |
| | AND LOBBIES, STAIRS AND ELEVATOR AREAS, AND EXTERNAL |
| | UNENCLOSED CIRCULATION AREAS. THE FAR CALCULATION SHALL |
| | NOT INCLUDE PARKING AREAS; UNENCLOSED COLONNADES, |
| | PORCHES AND BALCONIES; MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL |
| | SPACES; TRASH ROOMS; AND STORAGE SPACES WITHOUT WINDOWS |
| | AND ENCLOSED BY SURFACES THAT ALLOW FOR NATURAL |
| | VENTILATION OR OUTSIDE AIR CIRCULATION. THE FLOOR AREA |
| | SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE OUTSIDE FACE OF EXTERIOR |
| | WALLS. |
| | |
| | 14. ALL SETBACK MEASUREMENTS SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AT THE |
| | CLOSEST POINT BETWEEN THE FA?ADE OF THE BUILDING AND |
| | THE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE. |
| | |
| | 15. BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE MIXED-USE |
| | BUILDINGS ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY. |
| | |
| | 16. IT IS UNCLEAR AS TO WHERE FENCING IS PROPOSED |
| | THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT AS THERE IS NO DISTINGUISHING |
| | LINE TYPE INDICATING ITS LOCATION. |
| | |
| | 17. IF THE PARKING LOT ON SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY IS TO BE |
| | UTILIZED BY THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS, THEN SAFE PEDESTRIAN |
| | WALKWAYS SHOULD BE PROVIDED BETWEEN THE AREAS. |
| | |
| | 18. HOW WILL SIGNAGE BE ADDRESSED WITHIN THE PLANNED |
| | DEVELOPMENT? |
| | |
| | 19. THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AT THE |
| | INTERSECTION OF HAMPTON ROAD AND SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY. |
| | WITHIN ALL VISIBILITY TRIANGLES, NO MATERIALS SHALL BE |
| | INSTALLED BETWEEN A HEIGHT OF 18 INCHES AND 8 FEET. |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT THE REQUIRED VISIBILITY TRIANGLES ON |
| | SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY WILL NEED TO COMPLY WITH FDOT |
| | REQUIREMENTS AS IT IS A STATE HIGHWAY. PLEASE CONFIRM |
| | THAT THE BUS SHELTER, ON-STREET PARKING, MONUMENT SIGN, |
| | LANDSCAPING, ETC. DO NOT POSE ANY CONFLICTS. |
| | |
| | 20. THE TRASH COMPACTOR AT THE SOUTH END OF THE |
| | PROPERTY SEEMS LIKE IT WOULD BE DIFFICULT TO |
| | LOAD/UNLOAD. THE TURNING MOVEMENTS SHOWN ON SHEET C6.00 |
| | DON?T SEEM CONDUCIVE TO ACTUALLY PICKING IT UP. THE |
| | GATE CONFIGURATION APPEARS TO CONFLICT WITH THE |
| | MOVEMENTS AS WELL. |
| | |
| | 21. THE SIDEWALK ON THE EAST SIDE OF BUILDING #4 NEEDS |
| | TO BE EXTENDED TO INCORPORATE THE ACCESSIBLE AISLE. |
| | |
| | 22. IN THOSE AREAS WHERE THE HEAD OF THE PARKING STALL |
| | IS ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPING, THE WHEEL STOP CAN BE |
| | REMOVED, THE CURB RELOCATED TO EXPAND THE LANDSCAPE |
| | AREA, AND ALLOW THE OVERHANG TO OCCUR OVER THE SOD, |
| | ETC. THIS REDUCES MAINTENANCE, MINIMIZES TRIPPING |
| | HAZARDS, ETC. |
| | |
| | 23. A TURNAROUND SPACE WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED IN THE |
| | PARKING LOT BETWEEN BUILDINGS #5 AND #6. |
| | |
| | 24. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE ENCLOSURES AROUND THE |
| | TRASH COMPACTORS AND RECYCLING, AND INCLUDE THE HEIGHT |
| | OF THE ENCLOSURE. |
| | |
| | 25. THE ENCLOSURE IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE |
| | PROPERTY WILL NEED TO COMPLY WITH BUILDING SETBACKS (5 |
| | FEET MINIMUM). |
| | |
| | 26. ALL PROJECTIONS EXTENDING OUT FROM THE FA?ADE SHALL |
| | BE DIMENSIONED. STRUCTURAL INTRUSIONS SHALL NOT EXTEND |
| | MORE THAN 3 FEET INTO A SETBACK. AWNINGS SHALL NOT |
| | EXTEND MORE THAN 4 FEET INTO THE SETBACK. |
| | |
| | 27. WHERE IS MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (I.E. A/C CONDENSERS, |
| | ETC.) PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED? |
| | |
| | 28. THERE APPEAR TO BE SEVERAL LOCATIONS WHERE THE |
| | LANDSCAPE TERMINAL ISLANDS ARE NOT AT LEAST 5 FEET IN |
| | WIDTH, OR DON?T EXTEND THE FULL LENGTH OF THE PARKING |
| | STALL. |
| | |
| | 29. HAS ANY COORDINATION BEEN MADE WITH THE SCHOOL |
| | DISTRICT WITH REGARD TO THE PROVISION OF SCHOOL BUS |
| | PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AND HOW THAT WOULD OCCUR WITHIN THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT? |
| | |
| | 30. ONE OF THE PARKING ROWS (SOUTH OF THE POOL) IS |
| | MIS-NUMBERED WITH THE INCORRECT NUMBER OF SPACES. THE |
| | ROW IS LABELED WITH THE NUMBER 4, BUT ONLY 3 SPACES ARE |
| | PROVIDED IN THAT ROW. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X |
| | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE APRIL 17, 2018, |
| | PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE |
| | SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED |
| | DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN MARCH 2, 2018. |
| | |
| | G) TO BE PLACED ON THE APRIL 17, 2018, PLANNING BOARD |
| | AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER |
| | THAN APRIL 2, 2018. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM AND BE |
| | INSTALLED WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZONING |
| | AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AS ALSO PROVIDED IN |
| | THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED |
| | AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED |
| | ABOVE. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | P: 561.822.1448 |
| | F: 561.822.1460 |
| | |
| | E: [email protected] |
| | |
| | W: WPB.ORG |
| | |
| |
Print |
