| Plan Review Notes For Project Z17120022 |
| Project Number |
Z17120022 |
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
| Sequence Number |
1 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2018-01-10 08:52:30 | 1) WHY IS A DRIVEWAY NEEDED ON MERCER SINCE THE | | | PROPERTY HAS A CONNNECTION TO THE ALLEY THAT CONNECTS | | | TO MERCER AND THERE IS ALSO A DRIVEWAY ON ALPHA? | | | 2) INDICATE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL OF EXISTING ALLEYS. | | | 3) EXISTING ALLEYS DON'T APPEAR TO MEET MINIMUM WIDTHS | | | STANDARDS IN FLORIDA GREENBOOK. | | | 4) IS THERE A NEED TO EXCEED MINIMUM PARKING | | | REQUIREMENTS? | | | 5) PROJECT NARRATIVE STATES THAT PROJECT IS LOCATED | | | WITHIN TRAFFIC CONCUR. EXCEPTION AREA. PROJECT IS NOT | | | LOCATED WITHIN TCEA. REVISE PROJECT NARRATIVE. | | | | | | UPDATE 1-31-18 | | | REVIEWED TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT. TRAFFIC IMPACT | | | STATEMENT NEEDS TO BE REVISED TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH | | | CITY CODE SECTION 94-311. THE PROJECT MAY BE EXEMPT | | | FROM A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, IF THE PROJECT IS EXEMEMPT | | | THEN THE IMPACT STATEMENT MUST CLEARLY STATE THE | | | APPLICABLE PORTION OF THE CODE ALLOWING THE EXEMPTION. | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E. | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 494-1092 | | | [email protected] |
| |
Print |
|
