| Date |
Text |
| 2018-06-22 14:22:25 | CASE NO. 1060JJ - 2ND REVIEW |
| | BRANDSMART SUBDIVISION MAJOR PD AMENDMENT |
| | 751 WEST EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN |
| | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON |
| | WEDNESDAY, JULY 11, 2018, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE |
| | SCHEDULED FOR THE AUGUST 21, 2018 PLANNING BOARD |
| | MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM |
| | THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY AUGUST 22, 2018), THE |
| | CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION |
| | SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 1) STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT A 90 FOOT SIGN HEIGHT. THE |
| | BUILDING WAS BUILT WITH A TOWER ELEMENT TO ACT SOLELY |
| | AS A LOCATION FOR THE WALL SIGN. THAT SIGN HEIGHT IS 60 |
| | FEET. |
| | |
| | 2) CLARIFICATION NEEDED: THE JUSTIFICATION MATERIAL |
| | CONTINUES TO STATE THAT TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY |
| | CONFIRMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY. |
| | STAFF WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT THERE IS NO NEW |
| | SQUARE FOOTAGE BEING PROPOSED AS PART OF THIS |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 3) WAIVERS: |
| | |
| | A. WAIVER #2 - IS THIS INTENDED FOR BUILDINGS THAT |
| | CURRENTLY HAVE LESS THAN THE REQUIRED SETBACK ONLY? |
| | STAFF WILL SUPPORT THIS ONLY IF NEW CONSTRUCTION |
| | CONFORMS TO REQUIRED GC SETBACKS. |
| | B. WAIVER #3 IS NOT REQUIRED - THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE IN |
| | THE CPD IS 10,000 SF, NOT 2 ACRES. |
| | C. WAIVER #6 - STAFF WILL ONLY SUPPORT FOR TRACT 1A. |
| | D. WAIVER #4 - THE PARCEL BREAKDOWN TABLE SHOWS NO |
| | PARCEL WITH LESS THAN 72% OPEN SPACE. WHERE DID 8% COME |
| | FROM? STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT THIS. (SEE THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS STAFF IS PROPOSING). |
| | |
| | 4) CLARIFICATION NEEDED: CROSS PARKING. |
| | |
| | A. SECTION 7.1 OF THE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS STATES |
| | THAT ALL PARKING AREAS WITHIN THE PROPERTY ARE INCLUDED |
| | AS PART OF THE COMMONS FACILITIES. HOWEVER, IT FURTHER |
| | STATES THAT A SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION CAN BE ISSUED |
| | THAT REMOVES THE PARKING FOR SPECIFIC PARCELS FROM THE |
| | DECLARATION OF COVENANTS. THIS IS CONCERNING SINCE IT |
| | MAY REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF PROVIDED PARKING FOR A |
| | SPECIFIC BUSINESS. |
| | B. THE PLAT ONLY PERMITS CROSS ACCESS ON THE PARKING |
| | AISLES AND DOES NOT MENTION CROSS-PARKING. |
| | |
| | 5) THERE ARE ERRORS AND ADDITIONAL DETAIL NEEDED ON THE |
| | PARKING TABLE. |
| | |
| | A. THE BUILDING PERMITS FOR STEAK AND SHAKE (3,880 SF) |
| | AND GOLFSMITH (19,593 SF) CONTAIN GREATER NUMBERS THAN |
| | ARE SHOWN ON THE PARKING TABLE. THE HIGHER BUILDING |
| | PERMIT VALUES REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PARKING IN THE |
| | "REQUIRED COLUMN". |
| | B. WHEN FRACTIONAL REQUIREMENTS EXIST, IT ROUNDS DOWN |
| | AT 0.5, SO THERE IS ONE LESS SPACE REQUIRED FOR PARCEL |
| | 1 & 1A. |
| | C. STAFF ONLY COUNTS 224 PARKING SPACES ON PARCEL 4 & |
| | 4A. PLEASE RECHECK THE NUMBERS. |
| | D. PLEASE ADD A TOTAL COLUMN FOR THE PARKING TABLE SO |
| | THAT IT IS EASY TO SEE IF THE OVERALL SITE REQUIREMENTS |
| | ARE MET BY WHAT IS PROVIDED (ADA TABLE AS WELL). |
| | |
| | 6) THE SITE, AS IT WAS DEVELOPED (BRANDSMART, STEAK AND |
| | SHAKE, GOLFSMITH) COMPLIES WITH ADA REQUIREMENTS. |
| | HOWEVER, THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS CHANGE BASED ON THE |
| | SEPARATION OF PARCEL 4A FROM PARCEL 1. |
| | |
| | A. THE ADA PARKING TABLE IN THE ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS HAS AN ERROR. PARKING LOTS |
| | HAVING 400-500 PARKING SPACES ONLY REQUIRE 9 OF THEM TO |
| | BE ADA COMPLIANT. ONE LESS SPACE IS REQUIRED FOR |
| | PARCELS 1 AND 1A. |
| | B. PARCEL 3 ONLY REQUIRES 2 ADA SPACES SINCE THERE ARE |
| | LESS THAN 50 REQUIRED PARKING SPACES. |
| | C. A TOTAL OF 18 ADA PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED, YET |
| | THE SIGHT ONLY PROVIDES 17 ADA PARKING SPACES. (PARCEL |
| | 4 & 4A ACTUALLY HAVE 8 ADA SPACES) |
| | D. IF PARCEL 4A WAS JOINED WITH PARCEL 1, AS THE SITE |
| | WAS ORIGINALLY DESIGNED, THEN ONLY 17 ADA PARKING |
| | SPACES ARE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 7) BICYCLE PARKING IS REQUIRED FOR THE THREE BUILDINGS. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE THE AMOUNT AND LOCATIONS OF BICYCLE |
| | PARKING. ANY DEFICIENCY WILL NEED TO BE CORRECTED PRIOR |
| | TO THE CITY SIGNING THE PLAT. |
| | |
| | 8) DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS |
| | |
| | A. THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE LABELS ON THE MASTER |
| | PLAN FOR WHICH PARCEL FRONTAGE IS THE FRONT, SIDE AND |
| | REAR. THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS REVIEWED THE FRONTAGE |
| | LOCATIONS AND RECOMMENDS THE FOLLOWING (ADJUST ALL THE |
| | FRONTAGES ACCORDINGLY): |
| | |
| | PARCEL 1 - EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE = FRONT |
| | PARCEL 3 - EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE = FRONT |
| | BRANDSMART WAY = SIDE |
| | |
| | B. SETBACKS - ALL PARCELS ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH |
| | THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT SETBACKS BASED |
| | ON THE FRONTAGE LISTED ON THE MASTER PLAN. |
| | |
| | C. LANDSCAPE |
| | |
| | LANDSCAPE AREA: THE OVERALL SITE IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE |
| | A MINIMUM OF 15% LANDSCAPE AREA. UPON REDEVELOPMENT, |
| | PARCELS 2, 3 & 4/4A MUST PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 10% |
| | LANDSCAPE AREA. |
| | |
| | A MINIMUM FIVE (5) FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS |
| | REQUIRED AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE BRANDSMART CPD. |
| | AT SUCH TIME THAT PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4/4A ARE |
| | REDEVELOPED, A MINIMUM FIVE (5) FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE |
| | BUFFER IS REQUIRED ADJACENT TO ROADWAY TRACT 3. |
| | ANY EXISTING LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO ROADWAY TRACT |
| | 3 MAY NOT BE REDUCED. |
| | A LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS NOT REQUIRED FOR THE PORTIONS OF |
| | PARCELS 1A, 2 AND 4 THAT ARE LOCATED ADJACENT TO A |
| | STORMWATER TRACT. HOWEVER, ANY PARKING OR VEHICULAR USE |
| | AREA LOCATED ON TRACTS 2 AND 4 ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE |
| | A MINIMUM FIVE (5) FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER WHERE |
| | ADJACENT TO A STORMWATER TRACT. |
| | A LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS NOT REQUIRED BETWEEN PARCELS 1 |
| | AND 4A AND BETWEEN PARCELS 3 AND 4. |
| | AN EASEMENT MAY NOT BE USED TO MEET THE REQUIRED |
| | LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENT. |
| | FOUNDATION PLANTING IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | D. MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE: PARCELS 2, 3 & 4/4A SHALL BE |
| | PERMITTED A MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE OF 75%. THE MAXIMUM |
| | OVERALL LOT COVERAGE PERMITTED IN THE BRANDSMART CPD IS |
| | 60%. [ALLOW 75% ON PARCEL 1?] |
| | |
| | E. BUILDING HEIGHT: EACH INDIVIDUAL PARCEL (2, 3 & |
| | 4/4A) SHALL BE PERMITTED A MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF |
| | FIFTY (50) FEET. [IS IT INTENDED THAT PARCEL 1 MEET GC |
| | HEIGHT?] |
| | |
| | F. FLOOR AREA RATIO- THE MAXIMUM OVERALL FLOOR AREA |
| | RATIO FOR THE BRANDSMART CPD IS 1.0. AN INDIVIDUAL |
| | PARCEL MAY NOT EXCEED AN FAR OF 2.0. |
| | |
| | G. ANY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS NOT SPECIFICALLY STATED |
| | IN THE BRANDSMART CPD, SHALL COMPLY WITH THE GENERAL |
| | COMMERCIAL ZONING REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 9) PROVIDE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE EXECUTIVE CENTER |
| | DRIVE PARK. THIS AREA WILL NEED TO BE RESERVED WITH A |
| | CONSERVATION EASEMENT PRIOR TO THE CITY ACCEPTING THE |
| | PLAT. |
| | |
| | 10) ITEM TO DISCUSS: THE COVENANTS HAVE A LIST OF |
| | RESTRICTED/PROHIBITED USES. THIS CAN BE PUT INTO THE |
| | ADOPTING LEGISLATION AND THE CITY WILL ENFORCE IT. |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT SOME USES ARE ALREADY PROHIBITED BY |
| | THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION WITHIN THE |
| | CPD'S BASE GC ZONING. |
| | |
| | 11) PLEASE NOTE THAT THE EXECUTIVE CENTER PARK IS |
| | PROPOSED AS A MITIGATING FACTOR TO GRANT THE WAIVERS |
| | REQUIRED TO SUBDIVIDE THE PROPERTY. AS SUCH, THE SITE |
| | NEEDS TO HAVE A LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVED AS PART OF THE |
| | APPROVAL AND THE ADDITIONAL MATERIAL WILL NEED TO BE |
| | INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE CITY SIGNING THE PLAT. |
| | |
| |
Print |
