| Date |
Text |
| 2017-12-13 11:22:48 | CASE NO. 1060JJ |
| | BRANDSMART SUBDIVISION MAJOR PD AMENDMENT |
| | 751 WEST EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN |
| | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, |
| | DECEMBER 29, 2017, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR |
| | THE FEBRUARY 20, 2018 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY FEBRUARY 13, |
| | 2018), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY |
| | FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 1) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE AREA BREAKDOWN TABLE ON |
| | THE MASTER PLAN AND THE WAIVER TABLE IN THE |
| | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. FURTHER DISCUSSION NEEDS TO |
| | TAKE PLACE ON HOW: |
| | A. THE EXISTING CONDITIONS WILL BE MEMORIALIZED IN THE |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. |
| | B. THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE UNIMPROVED PARCELS |
| | WILL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT ZONING REGULATIONS OR |
| | ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR THE INDIVIDUAL |
| | PARCEL - EX. SETBACKS, NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES, |
| | IMPERVIOUS/PERVIOUS, LANDSCAPE PERCENTAGE, FLOOR AREA |
| | RATIO, ETC. |
| | C. THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT (ULTIMATE BUILD-OUT) WILL |
| | COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE |
| | ENTIRE SITE - EX. IMPERVIOUS/PERVIOUS, LANDSCAPE |
| | PERCENTAGE, FLOOR AREA RATIO, ETC. |
| | |
| | 2) STAFF WILL PROVIDE A COPY OF THE PALM BEACH OUTLETS |
| | DESIGN GUIDELINES AND THE AUSTRALIAN/BELVEDERE CPD AS |
| | DISCUSSION POINTS FOR POTENTIAL MODELS. STAFF |
| | RECOMMENDS A FOLLOW-UP MEETING TO DISCUSS. |
| | |
| | 3) THE AREA BREAKDOWN TABLE FAILED TO PROVIDE |
| | INFORMATION ON THE AMOUNT OF LANDSCAPE ON THE OVERALL |
| | SITE OR FOR INDIVIDUAL PARCELS. PLEASE NOTE THAT DRY |
| | DETENTION AREAS DO NOT COUNT TOWARD MEETING THE 15% |
| | LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT. |
| | |
| | 4) THE AREA BREAKDOWN TABLE FAILED TO PROVIDE |
| | INFORMATION ON THE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE ON THE OVERALL |
| | SITE OR FOR INDIVIDUAL PARCELS. |
| | |
| | 5) THE AREA BREAKDOWN TABLE FAILED TO PROVIDE |
| | INFORMATION ON THE AMOUNT OF FLOOR AREA RATIO ON THE |
| | OVERALL SITE OR FOR INDIVIDUAL PARCELS. |
| | |
| | 6) STAFF IS UNCLEAR WHAT THE SIGN WAIVER IS ASKING FOR. |
| | |
| | 7) INSUFFICIENT JUSTIFICATION WAS PROVIDED AS TO WHY |
| | STAFF SHOULD SUPPORT THE WAIVERS THAT ARE REQUESTED. |
| | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WAIVERS ARE TO ENCOURAGE THE USE OF |
| | INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES TO |
| | CREATE MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT IN THE |
| | CITY. THE SUBDIVISION OF AN EXISTING RETAIL CENTER, |
| | REQUIRING WAIVERS, WITH NO MITIGATING LAND PLANNING AND |
| | DEVELOPMENT FACTORS DOES NOT MEET THESE CRITERIA. |
| | |
| | 8) STAFF HAS NOTED THE CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT ON THE |
| | NORTH END OF THE SITE (ADJACENT TO THE STEAK AND SHAKE |
| | PARCEL) AND WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS FORMALLY |
| | INCORPORATED INTO A POTENTIAL CONNECTION TO FUTURE |
| | DEVELOPMENT TO THE NORTH. |
| | |
| | 9) THE SETBACK FOR THE EXISTING BRANDSMART BUILDING WAS |
| | NOT SHOWN TO THE NORTH LINE OF PARCEL 1 AT THE CLOSEST |
| | POINT. |
| | |
| | 10) CROSS PARKING AND CROSS UTILITY |
| | AGREEMENTS/EASEMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
