| Date |
Text |
| 2017-12-13 11:29:19 | CASE NO. 1060KK |
| | BRANDSMART MAJOR SUBDIVISION |
| | 751 WEST EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN |
| | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, |
| | DECEMBER 29, 2017, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR |
| | THE FEBRUARY 20, 2018 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS/THE PPRC MEETING (BY |
| | FEBRUARY 13, 2018), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED |
| | WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW |
| | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 1) PROVIDE A TABLE ON THE PLAT COVER SHEET WHICH SHOWS |
| | ALL THE PROPOSED PARCELS AND THEIR ACREAGE. |
| | |
| | 2) PROVIDE A LISTING OF THE RESERVATION SECTION FOR THE |
| | VARIOUS TRACTS CONTAINING ROADWAY, STORMWATER, PARKING |
| | AND LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON THE PLAT COVER SHEET. |
| | |
| | 3) PLEASE VERIFY THAT THE PARCEL CONFIGURATION SHOWN ON |
| | THE PROPOSED PLAT MATCHES THE PARCEL LINES ON THE |
| | MASTER PLAN. VISUALLY THEY LOOK TO HAVE DIFFERENCES; |
| | HOWEVER, THAT MAY BE AN EFFECT OF THE DIFFERING SCALES. |
| | |
| | 4) NOT ALL THE EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THE MASTER PLAN ARE |
| | SHOWN ON THE PLAT. PLEASE EXPLAIN. |
| | |
| | 5) THE PARCEL LINES NEED TO FOLLOW EXISTING FEATURES |
| | SUCH AS CURB LINES AND THE ENDS OF THE PARKING SPACES. |
| | PARCEL 1A SHOWS THE TAIL END OF SOME OF THE PARKING |
| | SPACES WITHIN TRACT 3. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
