| Date |
Text |
| 2018-06-01 15:53:35 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER |
| | PROJECT: 302 DATURA Z17100015 |
| | JUNE 1, 2018 |
| | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND |
| | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN THAT INCLUDES |
| | THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: |
| | ? SATISFIED. TREE SPECIES (OAK TREES ARE LAUREL OAK, |
| | NOT LIVE OAK) THE TWO TREES LOCATED ON OLIVE ARE |
| | HOLLIES, NOT BLACK OLIVES. |
| | ? SATISFIED. TREE CANOPY DIAMETER FOR EACH TREE |
| | ? SATISFIED. COLUMN FOR REMOVED OR PRESERVED IN PLACE. |
| | ? SATISFIED. REASON FOR REMOVAL. PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | DOCUMENTATION. NEED MORE INFORMATION. |
| | ? CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. MITIGATION CHART SHOWING |
| | TOTAL TREE CANOPY REMOVED AND TREE CANOPY ADDED. ALL |
| | TREES TO BE REMOVED NEED TO BE SHOWN ON THE CHART. |
| | |
| | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE TREES FOR THE FOUNDATION |
| | PLANTING AS REQUIRED ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE |
| | BUILDING. STAFF SUGGESTS EXCHANGING THE GUMBO LIMBO |
| | TREES AND THE DAHOON HOLLIES TO PROVIDE A SMALL SCALE |
| | TREE NEXT TO THE BUILDING AND CANOPY TREES IN THE |
| | PARKING AREA. |
| | |
| | 3. SATISFIED. STAFF SUGGESTS EXPLORING OPTIONS TO |
| | EXPAND THE PLANTING AREAS TO ACCOMMODATE LARGER SCALE |
| | SHADE TREES AND PROVIDE SHADE FOR PARKING SPACES. STAFF |
| | DOES NOT SUPPORT REMOVING EXISTING SHADE TREES AND |
| | REPLACING THEM WITH PALMS OR SMALLER SCALE TREES. |
| | RELOCATING THE CURBS BACK TO THE WHEEL STOP POSITION TO |
| | PROVIDE MORE PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA IS ALSO SUGGESTED |
| | IF THE PAVEMENT IS BEING REPLACED. STAFF DOES NOT |
| | SUPPORT REMOVAL OF THE LARGE BLACK OLIVE TREE AT THE |
| | NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY AND WOULD LIKE TO |
| | DISCUSS OPTIONS TO MODIFY THE PARKING SPACE ROW DESIGN |
| | AND ROLLING GATE PLACEMENT IN ORDER TO PRESERVE THE |
| | TREE. ALSO SEE ABOVE COMMENT REGARDING SHADE TREES IN |
| | PARKING AREA. |
| | |
| | 4. SATISFIED. THE GENERATOR PAD LOCATIONS PROPOSED |
| | RESTRICT THE CHOICE OF REQUIRED TREES, PLEASE RELOCATE |
| | TO PROVIDE MAXIMUM SPACE FOR ROOTS AND PROVIDE A SHADE |
| | TREE AS REQUIRED FOR THE TERMINAL ISLAND. STAFF |
| | SUGGESTS ADDING MORE PALMS AROUND THE DUMPSTER AND |
| | GENERATOR TO PROVIDE MORE SCREENING AND COME CLOSER TO |
| | ELIMINATING THE NONCONFORMING AREAS. |
| | |
| | 5. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE STREET TREES |
| | TO MEET THE 30 FOOT ON CENTER REQUIREMENT ALONG DATURA |
| | STREET AND OLIVE AVENUE ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY PER |
| | SECTION 94-113 (D) (2). THE TREES NEED TO MEET THE |
| | MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 20 FEET. CATHEDRAL LIVE OAKS ARE TO |
| | BE SPECIFIED ON DATURA, NOT LAUREL OAKS. STAFF WOULD |
| | LIKE TO DISCUSS THE SPECIES PROPOSED. |
| | |
| | 6. SATISFIED. THE EXISTING TWO BLACK OLIVE STREET TREES |
| | SHOULD BE REPLACED WITH NEW TREES TO PROVIDE |
| | CONSISTENCY ALONG THE BLOCK. THE COMMENT RESPONSE |
| | INDICATES REMOVAL, BUT TREE #9 IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS TO |
| | REMAIN. PLEASE CORRECT. THE BLACK OLIVE TREE IS |
| | INCORRECTLY IDENTIFIED AS A LAUREL OAK. |
| | |
| | 7. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TYPICAL |
| | SHOWING THE STRUCTURAL SOIL AND TREE GRATE |
| | INSTALLATION, AND SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURAL SOIL |
| | ON THE PLAN EXTENDING 5 FEET FROM THE REAR AND SIDES OF |
| | THE TREE GRATE. PLEASE PROVIDE THE TYPICAL DETAIL, AND |
| | SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF THE STRUCTURAL SOIL ON THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 8. SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK THAT |
| | IS ADJACENT TO A PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL HAVE THE |
| | STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO MEET THE |
| | LANDSCAPE AREA IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5 FOOT |
| | REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL AND THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS LESS |
| | THAN 4 FEET. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE |
| | PLAN, APPLICABLE TO THE STREET TREE ADJACENT TO THE |
| | CENTER ISLAND FOR THE PARKING AREA. |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1/22/18: |
| | 9. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD TREES OR PALMS |
| | IN THE WESTERN BUFFER TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 10. SATISFIED. THE 4 FOOT FENCE PROPOSED ALONG THE |
| | ALLEY CANNOT BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE |
| | BUFFER, PLEASE REVISE TO SHOW AT OR NEAR THE PROPERTY |
| | LINE. |
| | |
| | 11. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. AFTER MAKING THE ABOVE |
| | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE UPDATE THE TREE DISPOSITION AND |
| | MITIGATION CHARTS. |
| | |
| | 12. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW ANY LIGHTING LOCATIONS ON |
| | THE LANDSCAPE PLANS TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH TREES AND |
| | LANDSCAPING. |
| | |
| | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL |
| | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON |
| | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. THE TREE |
| | DISPOSITION CHART AND TREE MITIGATION SHALL BE REVISED |
| | TO MATCH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. |
| | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE |
| | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE |
| | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND |
| | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. |
| | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE |
| | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF |
| | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO THE |
| | DEVELOPMENT. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE |
| | MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. |
| | 4. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT, THE |
| | APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE THE TYPICAL STRUCTURAL SOIL |
| | DETAIL, ADD PALMS TO THE WESTERN BUFFER TO MEET CODE |
| | REQUIREMENTS, ADD TWO PALMS TO THE PALM BOSQUE AREA, |
| | AND ADJUST THE STREET TREES ALONG DATURA BETWEEN OLIVE |
| | AND THE FIRST PARKING LOT ENTRANCE TO BE EVENLY SPACED |
| | WITH THE WESTERN MOST TREE CLOSER TO THE DRIVEWAY. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |