| Date |
Text |
| 2019-02-12 20:26:12 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, |
| | COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE |
| | PROPOSED MAJOR SUBDIVISION ONLY. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR |
| | FULL COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. |
| | |
| | 2. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPOSED PROPERTY |
| | LINES. THE SUBMITTED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, |
| | DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL SECTION STATES THAT THE PROPOSAL |
| | IS TO COMBINE THE 7 LOTS INTO 2 LARGER LOTS. HOWEVER, |
| | THE SUBMITTED SURVEY APPEARS TO SHOW THE 7 LOTS |
| | COMBINED INTO 1 LOT. IF THAT IS CORRECT, THE FOLLOWING |
| | COMMENT WILL IS NOT APPLICABLE. |
| | |
| | 3. THIS COMMENT DOES IS NOT APPLICABLE IF THE PROPOSAL |
| | IS TO COMBINE THE 7 LOTS INTO 1 LOT. IF THE PROPSAL IS |
| | TO COMBINE THE 7 LOTS INTO 2 LOTS, THE SURVEY SHOULD |
| | SHOW THE 2 LOTS. WHEREVER THE LOT LINE IS PLACED TO |
| | SEPARATE THE 2 LOTS, THE FIRE RATING AND PERCENTAGE OF |
| | UNPROTECTED OPENINGS IN THE BUILDING WALLS CLOSE TO |
| | THAT LOT LINE SHALL BE COMPLY WITH TABLE 602, SECTION |
| | 705, AND TABLE 705.8, OF FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. TO |
| | DEMONSTRATE THAT COMPLIANCE, A DRAWING WOULD HAVE TO BE |
| | SUBMITTED SHOWING THE WALL FIRE RESISTANCE RATING, |
| | PERCENTAGE OF UNPROTECTED OPENINGS, AND WHETHER THE |
| | BUILDINGS ARE FULLY FIRE SPRINKLER PROTECTED. NO |
| | INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO ASSERTAIN WHAT |
| | PERCENTAGE OF THE AFFECTED WALLS WOULD BE CONSIDERED |
| | "UNPROTECTED OPENING" AND WHETHER THE BUILDINGS ARE |
| | FULLY SPRINKLER PROTECTED AS DEFINED BY NFPA 13. |
| | |
| | |
| | ROBERT BROWN |
| | BUILDING OFFICIAL |
| | TEL: 561 805 6652 |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
