| Date |
Text |
| 2017-09-05 17:08:21 | CASE NO. 1633F |
| | NAME OF CASE BELLA VITA ESTATES MINOR PD AMENDMENT |
| | ADDRESS 8230 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD |
| | - CONTACT ALEX HANSEN AT (561) 822-1463 OR |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN |
| | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG/.PDF |
| | FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THESE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM TODAY?S DATE (SEPTEMBER 5, 2017), THE CASE SHALL |
| | BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL |
| | REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($60). |
| | |
| | |
| | 1. PLEASE ADDRESS THE MULTIPLE INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN |
| | THE LOCATIONS AND TYPOLOGIES OF THE LIGHT POLES |
| | DEPICTED IN THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN AND THOSE |
| | DEPICTED IN THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN. ALL PLANS MUST SHOW |
| | THE SAME CONDITIONS. |
| | |
| | 2. THE PROPOSED PLANS SHOW GAPS ON THE SIDEWALKS |
| | FRONTING BUILDINGS 4, 5, AND 6 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH AND |
| | WEST SIDES OF THE SITE. THESE SIDEWALK GAPS PREVENT THE |
| | SAFE AND EFFICIENT CIRCULATION OF PEDESTRIANS WITHIN |
| | THE PROJECT. IN ADDITION, THE SITE PLAN IS MISSING THE |
| | PEDESTRIAN CROSSING STRIPING THAT CONNECTS THE |
| | SIDEWALKS ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PARKING LOT LOCATED |
| | BETWEEN BUILDINGS 2 AND 3. THE PLANS NEED TO BE REVISED |
| | TO ADD THE MISSING SIDEWALKS AND MISSING PEDESTRIAN |
| | CROSSING STRIPING. |
| | |
| | 3. THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ON THE SOUTHWEST SECTION OF |
| | THE SITE SEEMS TO CONNECT THE SIDEWALK FRONTING |
| | BUILDING 4 TO WHAT THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS AS A |
| | LANDSCAPE ISLAND WITH A TREE TO THE SOUTHEAST OF |
| | BUILDING 5. THE PLANS NEED TO BE REVISED TO SHOW THE |
| | PEDESTRIAN CROSSING CONNECTING TO SIDEWALKS ON BOTH |
| | SIDES OF THE ROAD. |
| | |
| | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE PROOF WITH AUTOTURN (OR OTHER SIMILAR |
| | SOFTWARE) DRAWINGS THAT THE NEW PROPOSED MAIN ENTRANCE |
| | ROAD CONFIGURATION WILL ALLOW FOR SCHOOL BUSES TO TURN |
| | WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT. IN ADDITION, PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | GRAPHIC PROOF THAT THE SCHOOL BUSES WILL BE ABLE TO |
| | ADEQUATELY TURN AND STOP NEXT TO THE SCHOOL BUS SHELTER |
| | SHOWN NEAR THE ENTRANCE OF THE DEVELOPMENTS WHILE |
| | COMPLYING WITH THE APPROPRIATE AMERICANS WITH |
| | DISABILITY?S ACT (ADA) ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS. |
| | ALSO, THERE SHOULD BE A PAVED CONNECTION BETWEEN THE |
| | BUS SHELTER AND THE EDGE OF THE CURB IN FRONT OF THE |
| | SHELTER |
| | |
| | 5. PLEASE PROVIDE PROOF WITH AUTOTURN (OR OTHER SIMILAR |
| | SOFTWARE) DRAWINGS THAT THE NEW PROPOSED MAIN ENTRANCE |
| | ROAD CONFIGURATION WILL ALLOW FOR VISITORS? CARS UNABLE |
| | TO ENTER PAST THE GATE TO TURN AFTER THE CALL BOX WHILE |
| | STILL ALLOWING FOR OTHER CARS TO DRIVE THROUGH THE |
| | VISITOR?S ENTRY LANE. |
| | |
| | 6. PLEASE PROVIDE A CURRENT SCHOOL CAPACITY |
| | AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION (SCAD) APPROVAL FROM THE |
| | SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY CONFIRMING THAT |
| | THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT MEETS THE ADOPTED LEVEL OF |
| | SERVICE (LOS) FOR SCHOOLS. |
| | |
| | 7. PLEASE INDICATE WHETHER ANY FENCES ARE PROPOSED |
| | AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE PUPPY PARK, THE SWIMMING |
| | POOL AREA NEXT TO THE CLUBHOUSE PARTIAL I, AND IN THE |
| | AREA AROUND THE CLUBHOUSE PARTIAL II. IF FENCES ARE |
| | PROPOSED IN ANY OF THESE AREAS THEN THEIR DETAILS |
| | SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 8. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SUBMITTED AS PART OF THIS |
| | APPLICATION SHOW SOME LANDSCAPE AREAS WHICH WERE PART |
| | OF THE PREVIOUS APPROVAL AS SHADOWED. THERE ARE SEVERAL |
| | LOCATIONS WITHIN THE NEW PLANS WHERE THERE ARE |
| | CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE SHADOWED LANDSCAPING AND OTHER |
| | REVISED COMPONENTS OF THE PLAN (E.G. TREES AFFECTING |
| | THE PARKING LOT NEAR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE). |
| | AS A RESULT, PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR |
| | THE PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 9. STAFF SUGGESTS INCLUDING BICYCLE PARKING NEAR THE |
| | ENTRANCE TO THE CLUBHOUSE PARTIAL II BUILDING. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
