| Date |
Text |
| 2017-09-07 08:29:02 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) THE APPLICATION IS SEEKING A 40 PERCENT PARKING |
| | REDUCTION FROM THE CITYWIDE PARKING STANDARDS FOR |
| | MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL. CURRENTLY, THE PLANNING |
| | DIVISION IS IN THE PROCESS OF PROCESSING A ZLDR TEXT |
| | AMENDMENT THAT WOULD REDUCE THE PARKING REQUIREMENT (UP |
| | TO 40%) FOR SENIOR HOUSING PROJECTS. THE SCHEDULE FOR |
| | PROCESSING THE ZLDR TEXT AMENDMENT IS UNCERTAIN AT THIS |
| | TIME. ACCORDING TO THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, IT IS |
| | THE APPLICANT?S INTENT TO PROCESS THE APPLICATION |
| | ALONGSIDE WITH THE CITY-INITIATE ZLDR TEXT AMENDMENT. |
| | THE APPLICANT ALSO UNDERSTANDS THAT THE SITE PLAN WILL |
| | NOT BE APPROVED UNTIL THE TEXT AMENDMENT IS FORMALLY |
| | ADOPTED BY THE CITY. |
| | |
| | 2.) PROVIDE A TRAFFIC LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | TRAFFIC DIVISION STATING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT |
| | MEETS THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) OF THE |
| | COUNTY. THE COUNTY LETTER APPROVING THE TPS STANDARDS |
| | OF THE COUNTY SHALL BE RECEIVED BY STAFF PRIOR TO |
| | SCHEDULING THE APPLICATION FOR A PUBLIC HEARING. |
| | |
| | 3.) PROVIDE A SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY |
| | DETERMINATION (SCAD) LETTER FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF |
| | PALM BEACH COUNTY STATING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT |
| | MEETS THE SCHOOL CONCURRENCY REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| | COUNTY. THE SCAD LETTER APPROVING SCHOOL CONCURRENCY |
| | SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO STAFF PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE |
| | APPLICATION FOR A PUBLIC HEARING. |
| | |
| | 4.) THE SURVEY SHOWS A 10 FT. WIDE UTILITY AND ROW |
| | EASEMENT ALONG THE NORTH AND EAST PROPERTY LINES. |
| | ACCORDING TO ORB RECORDS, FDOT MAY HAVE AN INTEREST IN |
| | THE ROW EASEMENT. THE APPLICANT WILL BE REQUIRED TO |
| | OBTAIN WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION FROM FDOT AND PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY TRAFFIC (COMMUNITY DRIVE IS A COUNTY ROADWAY), |
| | STATING THAT THE ROW EASEMENT IS NOT NEEDED, AS THIS |
| | MAY IMPLICATE THE BUILDING SETBACK LINE ALONG THE NORTH |
| | AND EAST SIDES OF THE PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 5.) THE APPLICANT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ENVELOPES |
| | AND ADDRESSED LABELS FOR THE PUBLIC NOTICE MAILERS. A |
| | SIGNED AND NOTARIZED PUBLIC NOTICE MAILER AFFIDAVIT |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO EACH PUBLIC HEARING. |
| | |
| | 6.) ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, INCLUDING NEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF AN |
| | EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS |
| | ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN $750,000.00 IS SUBJECT TO |
| | THE ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 78, |
| | ARTICLE V, OF THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCES. |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PROVIDE DETAILS AND DIMENSIONS ON THE PROPOSED |
| | MONUMENT SIGN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY. |
| | INCLUDE ANY SETBACK DIMENSIONS FROM THE PROPERTY |
| | LINE(S). PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN |
| | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS OF ZLDR |
| | S.94-407. |
| | |
| | 2.) ADD DIMENSIONS TO THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS (I.E. |
| | WIDTH). |
| | |
| | 3.) THERE ARE TWO (2) EXISTING TRANSFORMER PADS LOCATED |
| | ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE, WHICH SEEMS TO BE |
| | MISSING FROM THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE INCLUDE THE |
| | TRANSFORMERS IN THE SITE PLAN FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 4.) WHERE IS THE LOCATION OF A/C UNITS/MECHANICAL |
| | EQUIPMENT (I.E. GROUND LEVEL OR ROOFTOP)? PLEASE NOTE |
| | THAT MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW |
| | BY EITHER LANDSCAPING OR THE BUILDING PARAPET. |
| | |
| | 5.) PHOTOMETRIC PLAN INDICATES THE USE OF POLE |
| | FIXTURES. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE THE LOCATION OF THESE |
| | FIXTURES IN THE SITE PLAN AND PROVIDE SETBACK |
| | DIMENSIONS FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE |
| | POLES MUST BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 5 FT. FROM THE |
| | PROPERTY LINE(S). ALSO, INCLUDE A DETAIL OF THE POLE |
| | FIXTURE IN THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 6.) HOW BIG ARE THE 1 BR AND 2BR UNITS? |
| | |
| | 7.) ADD OUTDOOR/PEDESTRIAN AMENITIES (I.E. BENCHES, |
| | GAZEBO, WALKING PATH AROUND THE LAKE, ETC.) FOR THE |
| | RESIDENTS OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. |
| | |
| | 8.) ADD TRAFFIC CALMING/CROSSWALKS LEADING FROM THE |
| | PARKING LOT TO THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 9.) THE PROPOSED BICYCLE RACKS MUST DEMONSTRATE THAT |
| | ALL THE MINIMUM DIMENSIONS HAVE BEEN MET PER THE CITY'S |
| | BICYCLE PARKING STANDARDS (I.E. DISTANCE FROM EACH THE |
| | END OF THE RACK TO THE BUILDING/PAVEMENT. THIS IS TO |
| | ENSURE THAT THERE IS SUFFICIENT SPACE FOR BICYCLE |
| | PARKING AND THAT THE BICYCLE WILL NOT ENCROACH UPON ANY |
| | SIDEWALK/WALKING PATH). PLEASE ILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH DIMENSIONS. |
| | |
| | 10.) THE BICYCLE RACK LOCATED FURTHEST EAST SEEMS TO |
| | ENCROACH UPON LANDSCAPE. THIS IS NOT PERMITTED. PLEASE |
| | ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 11.) THERE SEEMS TO BE A DOOR LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE |
| | OF THE BUILDING; HOWEVER, THERE DOES NOT SEEM TO BE A |
| | WALKING PATH LEADING FROM THE DOOR TO THE PARKING AREA |
| | AND/OR SIDEWALK. PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 12.) THERE IS A PROPOSED T-TURNAROUND LOCATED AT THE |
| | NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY. HOWEVER, IT DOES NOT |
| | SEEM TO BE A PRACTICAL TURNAROUND FOR LARGER VEHICLES. |
| | WAS A CURB CUT CONSIDERED AT THIS LOCATION? THIS |
| | PROPOSED T-TURNAROUND MAY ALSO REQUIRE ADDITIONAL |
| | FEEDBACK FROM THE FIRE, ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS |
| | DEPT. |
| | |
| | |
| | LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) THERE ARE TWO (2) EXISTING TRANSFORMER PADS LOCATED |
| | ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE WHICH SEEMS TO BE MISSING |
| | FROM THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. PLEASE SHOW THE EXISTING |
| | TRANSFORMER PADS IN THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE |
| | THAT THE PADS WILL NOT CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED |
| | LANDSCAPING. |
| | |
| | 2.) SHOW LIGHT POLE FIXTURES IN THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO |
| | DEMONSTRATE THAT THE FIXTURES WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH |
| | THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE FOR THE PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 3.) A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO |
| | THE REMOVAL OF ANY TREES ON THE PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 4.) PLEASE ADDRESS ANY ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE COMMENTS |
| | PROVIDED BY THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE PLANNER, RAY CARANCI @ |
| | (561) 822-1462. ALL LANDSCAPE COMMENTS SHALL BE |
| | SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULING OF THE APPLICATION |
| | FOR A PUBLIC HEARING. |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS: |
| | |
| | 1.) FINAL ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHALL BE SIGNED, DATED |
| | AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED ARCHITECT. |
| | |
| | 2.) PLEASE ENSURE THAT ANY CHANGES TO THE SITE |
| | PLAN/LANDSCAPE AND PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ARE REFLECTED IN |
| | THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | |
| | LIGHTING PLAN: |
| | |
| | 1.) THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHALL BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY |
| | A FLORIDA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. |
| | |
| | 2.) PROVIDE A DETAIL (INCLUDING DIMENSIONS) OF THE |
| | PROPOSED POLE FIXTURES. |
| | |
| | 3.) THERE SEEMS TO BE AN EXISTING TRANSFORMER ALONG THE |
| | NORTH PROPERTY LINE THAT IS MISSING FROM THE |
| | PHOTOMETRIC PLAN. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PAD IN THE PLAN |
| | FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 4.) PER ZLDR S.94-309(A), ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE |
| | SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO |
| | REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY FROM ALL ADJACENT |
| | RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC |
| | THROUGHFARES. |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF |
| | FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 |
| | INCHES X 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 |
| | INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE |
| | NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT |
| | IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE |
| | ($600.00). |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE |
| | QUESTIONS. |
| |
Print |
