| Date |
Text |
| 2017-12-06 16:31:10 | THE COMMENTS BELOW ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE |
| | ENGINEERING PLANS AND SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT |
| | CALCULATIONS SIGNED AND SEALED BY RONALD W. LAST, P.E. |
| | ON 12/1/2017:. |
| | |
| | 1. SHOW MILL AND RESURFACE LIMITS FOR UTILITY TRENCH |
| | CUTS IN THE ROADWAY ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS. |
| | |
| | 2. PROVIDE CROSS SECTION FOR DRIVEWAY APRON SHOWING |
| | CROSS SLOPES AND MINIMUM 4 FEET WIDTH AT 2 PERCENT |
| | CROSS SLOPE TO MEET ADA CRITERIA FOR SIDEWALK. |
| | REMAINING DRIVEWAY SLOPE SHOULD NOT EXCEED 8% PER CITY |
| | STANDARD DETAIL GC-7. |
| | |
| | 3. EXISTING GRADES FOR TUXEDO LANE SHOW THE NORTH BOUND |
| | LANES SLOPE TOWARD THE PROJECT. INDICATE A SWALE |
| | BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND EDGE OF PAVEMENT AND PROVIDE |
| | TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FROM BACK OF WALK TO EDGE OF |
| | PAVEMENT. INVERT OF SWALE DOES NOT NEED TO BE MORE THAN |
| | 3 INCHES BELOW EDGE OF PAVEMENT. SWALE WON'T BE NEEDED |
| | IN DRIVEWAY BUT EDGE OF PAVEMENT SHOULD SLOPE ALONG |
| | DRIVEWAY TO CONVEY WATER TO THE SIDE(S) OF THE |
| | DRIVEWAY. SWALE LONGITUDINAL SLOPE CAN FOLLOW THE SLOPE |
| | OF THE ROAD (I.E. FROM SOUTH TO NORTH). |
| | |
| | 4. INVERT FOR MH#2 APPEARS TO BE LABELED WITH THE WRONG |
| | DIRECTION. |
| | |
| | 5. INDICATE IF A RETAINING WALL WILL BE NEEDED ALONG |
| | THE EAST PROPERTY LINE. THERE IS A 4 FOOT DROP FROM THE |
| | EXISTING GRADE ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE TO PROPOSED |
| | INTERIOR GRADES. |
| | |
| | 6. PROVIDE BACKUP FOR THE EXFILTRATION RATES SHOWN IN |
| | THE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 7. EXFILTRATION STORAGE DOES NOT REACH 0.08 AC-FT UNTIL |
| | STAGE 15.5 FEET NAVD, WHEN H2 IS 8.50 FEET. |
| | |
| | TRACY L. WARD, P.E |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-494-1120 |
| |
Print |
