| Date |
Text |
| 2017-10-26 15:28:12 | CASE NO. PB 1069U ? 3RD RESUBMITTAL |
| | KEISER UNIVERSITY FOOTBALL STADIUM |
| | 2600 N. MILITARY TRAIL |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN |
| | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT DUE TO THE EXTENSIVE |
| | NUMBER OF COMMENTS, CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS OR |
| | THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS THE |
| | COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE RESUBMITTAL REVIEW COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY |
| | ADDRESSED AND SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 |
| | PM ON FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2017, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE |
| | SCHEDULED FOR THE JANUARY 16, 2017 PLANNING BOARD |
| | MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM |
| | THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS (BY JANUARY 26, 2017), THE |
| | CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION |
| | SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | CONDITIONS THAT WILL BE INCLUDED WITH THE APPROVING |
| | LEGISLATION |
| | |
| | 1) PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL, THE APPLICANT |
| | SHALL PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT THE "COVENANT TO MAINTAIN |
| | DRAINAGE" RECORDED IN ORB 2474 PG 687 HAS BEEN |
| | TERMINATED. |
| | |
| | 2) THE PEDESTRIAN GATE WILL REQUIRE ACCESS FOR STUDENTS |
| | AND EMPLOYEES ALL THE TIME. ON GAME DAYS, A STAFF |
| | MEMBER IS REQUIRED TO ATTEND THE GATE TO PROVIDE ACCESS |
| | TO FANS. |
| | |
| | 3) THE FUTURE INSTALLATION OF CONCESSION AND |
| | MERCHANDISE STANDS OR BUILDINGS WILL REQUIRE THE PRIOR |
| | APPROVAL BY THE ZONING DIVISION AS A MINOR PLANNED |
| | DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT AND/OR FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW, |
| | DEPENDING ON THE SQUARE FOOTAGE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE |
| | APPROVED DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 4) ALL PARKING SPACES WITHIN ANY PARKING ROW WHICH HAS |
| | ANY RESTRIPING OR OTHER MODIFICATION MUST BE RESTRIPED |
| | TO COMPLY WITH CITY STANDARDS AT THE TIME OF RESTRIPING |
| | OR MODIFICATION. IN ANY EVENT, ALL PARKING SPACES NEED |
| | TO BE STRIPED TO MEET CITY STANDARDS BY DECEMBER 31, |
| | 2020. |
| | |
| | 5) STAFF RECOMMENDS REDESIGNING SOME OF THE SPEED HUMPS |
| | TO SPEED TABLES THAT CAN DOUBLE AS ADA COMPLIANT |
| | CROSSINGS OF THE MAIN ENTRY ROAD. |
| | |
| | CHANGES TO THE RES. NO. 2-12 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS |
| | |
| | 1) PARKING PROVISION REQUIREMENT TO BE BASED ON |
| | ENROLLMENT NUMBERS, NOT MAXIMUM ENROLLMENT. ANNUAL |
| | VERIFICATION IS REQUIRED FROM KEISER UNIVERSITY. |
| | SPECIFIC LANGUAGE IS STILL TO BE DRAFTED. THE PROPOSAL |
| | FROM APPLICANT WILL BE USED AS A STARTING POINT. |
| | |
| | 2) STAFF HAS DONE SOME RESEARCH ON ADJUNCT FACULTY AND |
| | WILL AGREE TO SPECIFICALLY PERMIT ADJUNCT FACULTY TO BE |
| | COUNTED AT A 1:2 RATIO. THIS NUMBER WILL NEED TO BE |
| | INCLUDED ON THE ANNUAL VERIFICATIONS. |
| | |
| | OUTSTANDING PLAN COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 1) REVISED SHEET MP.1 INCORRECTLY LISTS THE NUMBER OF |
| | ADA PARKING SPACES LOCATED IN THE NEW NORTHERN PARKING |
| | FIELD. THREE ADA PARKING SPACES WERE ADDED BUT IT STILL |
| | LISTS ONLY TWO ADA PARKING SPACES IN THE PARKING FIELD. |
| | |
| | 2) THE THREE NEW ADA PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED TO |
| | HAVE AN ADA COMPLIANT WALKWAY INSTALLED AT THE HEAD OF |
| | THE SPACES FROM THE ACCESS AISLE TO THE EXISTING |
| | WALKWAY NETWORK (COMMENT VERIFIED BY SAMANTHA HILL, |
| | CHIEF PLANS EXAMINER). |
| | |
| | 3) STAFF UNDERSTANDS THAT YOU DO NOT WISH TO FULLY |
| | DESIGN THE PLANS FOR THE NEW NORTHERN PARKING FIELD |
| | UNTIL THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVES THE CODE TEXT TO |
| | PERMIT THE PARKING WAIVER. STAFF HAS SCHEDULED THE CODE |
| | AMENDMENT FOR FIRST READING ON NOVEMBER 20, 2017, WITH |
| | THE SECOND READING ON DECEMBER 4, 2017. BOTH STAFF AND |
| | THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THIS |
| | REQUEST. |
| | PLEASE REMEMBER THAT CITY COMMISSION APPROVAL OF THE |
| | CODE AMENDMENT DOES NOT APPROVE YOUR PARKING REDUCTION, |
| | IT ALLOWS YOU TO HAVE THE ABILITY TO REQUEST THE |
| | REDUCTION AS PART OF A MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT |
| | AMENDMENT. THE CITY COMMISSION WILL APPROVE OR NOT |
| | APPROVE YOUR SPECIFIC PARKING WAIVER REQUEST, AFTER A |
| | RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING BOARD, WHEN THEY HEAR |
| | THE MAJOR AMENDMENT FOR THE STADIUM. |
| | |
| | 4) IN ORDER FOR STAFF TO BRING THE PLANS, INCLUDING THE |
| | PARKING WAIVER, BEFORE THE PLANNING BOARD AND THEN THE |
| | CITY COMMISSION, THE PLANS NEED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | ALL APPLICABLE CODE REQUIREMENTS. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS |
| | RELATING TO PARKING ARE STILL DEFICIENT: |
| | |
| | A. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT SHOW A CODE COMPLIANT |
| | LANDSCAPE BUFFER BETWEEN THE NEW NORTHERN PARKING FIELD |
| | AND THE NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE. |
| | B. NO TREE SURVEY WAS PROVIDED TO VERIFY MITIGATION FOR |
| | THE TREES REMOVED FOR THE NEW NORTHERN PARKING FIELD, |
| | THE NEW TURN AROUND AREAS AND OTHER NEW PAVING AND |
| | WALKWAYS TO BRING THE SITE INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE NEW STADIUM AND EXISTING |
| | CAMPUS ENROLLMENT/SQUARE FOOTAGE/FACULTY. STAFF VISITED |
| | THE SITE AND IT CLEARLY LOOKS LIKE TREES WILL NEED TO |
| | BE REMOVED FOR THE BUS PARKING AND TURN AROUND. THE |
| | TREE SURVEY WOULD VERIFY THE STATEMENT THAT FEATURES |
| | HAVE BEEN DESIGNED TO AVOID THE TREES. |
| | C. NO SURVEY OR CIVIL PLANS WERE PROVIDED FOR STAFF TO |
| | VERIFY THAT THE NEW NORTHERN PARKING FIELD, AS SHOWN ON |
| | THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS, DOES NOT HAVE CONFLICTS |
| | WITH SITE CONDITIONS. |
| | D. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT VERIFY THAT THE EXISTING |
| | PARKING AREAS COMPLY WITH PARKING LOT TREE REQUIREMENTS |
| | EITHER UNDER CURRENT CODE OR EARLIER APPROVED PLANS. |
| | STAFF HAS LOCATED A 1991 VERSION OF THE MASTER PLAN |
| | WHICH SHOWS TREE LOCATIONS, BUT NOT THE SPECIFIC |
| | SPECIES FOR THE LOWER PORTION OF THE CAMPUS PARKING AND |
| | A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE EXISTING NORTHERN PARKING |
| | FIELD FROM 2002. THE CURRENT LANDSCAPE PLAN NEEDS TO BE |
| | UPDATED TO REFLECT THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AND THE |
| | LANDSCAPE WILL NEED TO BE INSTALLED AS PART OF THE |
| | FOOTBALL STADIUM PROJECT. |
| | E. EVEN THOUGH THE RESTRIPED ADA PARKING SPACES BY |
| | BUILDING NOS. 8 AND 9 NOW HAVE AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, |
| | THEY ARE NOT THE CLOSEST TO ONES TO THE BUILDING |
| | ENTRANCE. STAFF VISITED THE SITE AND NOTED A SEVERE |
| | GRADE CHANGE IN THE AREA OF THE PROPOSED WALKWAY. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE CIVIL PLANS TO VERIFY THAT THE PROPOSED |
| | LAYOUT MEETS ADA REQUIREMENTS. IF IT DOES NOT, THEN AN |
| | ALTERNATIVE DESIGN WILL NEED TO BE PRESENTED. (COMMENT |
| | VERIFIED BY SAMANTHA HILL). |
| | F. THE PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FOR THE TWO ADA |
| | PARKING SPACES ADJACENT TO THE SOFTBALL FIELD DOES NOT |
| | COMPLY WITH THE ADA REQUIREMENTS SINCE THE ADA ACCESS |
| | AISLE DOES NOT CONNECT TO THE NEW WALKWAY. STAFF |
| | VISITED THE SITE AND CONFIRMED THAT THERE ARE LARGE |
| | PINE TREES LOCATED WHERE THE PATH WOULD NEED TO BE |
| | INSTALLED. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE REMOVAL OF THE |
| | TREES FOR THE WALKWAY. THE PROPOSED ADA ACCESS NEEDS TO |
| | BE DESIGNED TO AVOID THE TREES, SIMILAR TO THE |
| | ACCESSIBLE WALKWAY THAT WAS INSTALLED AS PART OF THE |
| | GOLF RANGE PROJECT. |
| | G. THE ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACE IN THE NORTHERN ROW OF |
| | PARKING WAS NOT REFLECTED ON THE PARKING FILED TOTAL |
| | NUMBER ON SHEET MP.1, NOR WAS THE PARKING TABLE |
| | UPDATED. |
| | H. ON OCTOBER 25, 2017, STAFF DROVE THROUGH THE SITE TO |
| | VERIFY THE BICYCLE PARKING AND ADA PARKING ITEMS AND |
| | NOTED THAT THERE ARE APPROXIMATELY 15-20 PARKING SPACES |
| | THAT ARE NOT USABLE DUE TO PORTABLE STORAGE CONTAINERS |
| | (PODS), DUMPSTERS, NO PARKING STRIPING AND KEISER |
| | UNIVERSITY BUSSES LOCATED WHERE PARKING SPACES ARE TO |
| | BE. THE ALREADY DEFICIENT PARKING FOR THE CAMPUS IS |
| | REDUCED EVEN MORE BY THE FEATURES. THE PODS AND |
| | DUMPSTERS NEED TO BE REMOVED FROM PARKING SPACES. THE |
| | SCHOOL VEHICLES NEED TO BE STORED IN THEIR OWN AREA |
| | THAT IS NOT PART OF THE PROVIDED PARKING COUNT. THE |
| | PLANS NEED TO BE UPDATED ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | LANDSCAPE |
| | |
| | 5) THE LANDSCAPE AREA ALONG THE RESIDENTIALLY ZONED |
| | PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH NEEDS ONE MORE OAK TREE TO FILL |
| | IN THE 63 FOOT GAP BETWEEN EXISTING OAK #95 AND THE NEW |
| | OAK. THIS WILL SATISFY THE ZONING COMMENT REGARDING THE |
| | BUFFER REQUIRED TO SUPPORT THE WAIVER TO THE REQUIRED |
| | 100 FOOT SETBACK. |
| | |
| | 6) SHOW THE POWERLINE POLES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO |
| | VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NOT CONFLICTS WITH THE REQUIRED |
| | PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE. |
| | |
| | 7) THE EASTERNMOST PARKING BAY ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF |
| | CECIL AVENUE DOES NOT SHOW THE RELOCATION OF THE TREES |
| | AWAY FROM THE LIGHT POLES. |
| | |
| | BICYCLE PARKING |
| | |
| | 8) STAFF PERFORMED A SITE VISIT TO CONFIRM THE BICYCLE |
| | PARKING AND DISCOVERED A NUMBER OF DEFICIENCIES. |
| | |
| | A. NONE OF THE EXISTING BICYCLE RACKS ARE LOCATED WHERE |
| | THEY ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE PLANS MUST SHOW |
| | ACCURATE CONDITIONS. |
| | B. THE TYPE OF BICYCLE RACK THAT IS CURRENTLY LOCATED |
| | IN SIX LOCATIONS ON THE SITE DOES NOT CONFORM TO CITY |
| | STANDARDS. STAFF WILL PERMIT THESE TO CONTINUE TO BE |
| | USED PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING: |
| | I) ALL RACKS MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO THE GROUND ON |
| | A PAVED SURFACE (ONLY ONE RACK WAS BOLTED TO THE GROUND |
| | AND ONE WAS LOCATED IN A LANDSCAPE AREA). |
| | II) THE EXISTING RACKS ARE ONLY APPROVED TO SECURE |
| | EIGHT (8) NOT TEN (10) BICYCLES. THERE ARE ONLY 48, NOT |
| | 60, BICYCLE PARKING SPACES CURRENTLY ON THE SITE. THERE |
| | ARE 12 ADDITIONAL BICYCLE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED. |
| | STAFF RECOMMENDS PLACING THEM BY THE FITNESS CENTER AND |
| | THE DEVOS-COOK ACADEMIC CENTER SO THAT MORE AREAS OF |
| | THE CAMPUS HAVE FACILITIES. |
| | |
| | 9) THE NEW BICYCLE RACKS NEED TO CONFORM TO THE CITY |
| | STANDARDS. THE PROVIDED BIKE RACK DETAIL CORRECTLY |
| | SHOWS A BICYCLE RACK THAT SERVES EIGHT (8) BICYCLES |
| | (NOT FIVE AS STATED IN THE TITLE). YOU WILL NEED TO |
| | PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE ADDITIONAL RACKS THAT DO NOT |
| | HAVE EIGHT SPACES. |
| | |
| | 10) THE BICYCLE RACK PAD PLAN SHOWS THE CORRECT |
| | DIMENSIONS FOR A RACK SERVING EIGHT BICYCLES THAT MEETS |
| | CITY STANDARDS; HOWEVER, IT DOES NOT SHOW THE ACCURATE |
| | LOCATION FOR A CITY COMPLIANT RACK. COMPLIANT RACKS ARE |
| | REQUIRED TO HAVE 24 INCHES FROM THE OUTSIDE ELEMENT TO |
| | THE EDGE OF THE PAD TO PROVIDE ROOM TO PARK THE OUTER |
| | BICYCLE. COMPLIANT RACKS ARE REQUIRED TO BE CENTERED IN |
| | THE MIDDLE OF THE PAD FROM FRONT TO BACK SO THAT THE |
| | FRAME IS LOCKED TO THE RACK. |
| | |
| | 11) A SPECIFIC PAD DETAIL WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED FOR |
| | THE EXISTING RACKS USING THEIR SPECIFIC WIDTH |
| | DIMENSIONS. DUE TO ALL THE BICYCLES BEING LOCKED WITHIN |
| | THE RACK, THEY DO NOT NEED AN OUTSIDE SEPARATION FROM |
| | THE PAD. THE DEPTH OF THESE PADS IS REQUIRED TO BE SIX |
| | (6) FEET FROM THE FRONT EDGE OF THE ELEMENT SINCE |
| | BICYCLES ARE PARKED WITH THE WHEEL LOCKED TO THE RACK, |
| | NOT THE FRAME. |
| | |
| | 12) THE PLANS NEED TO CLEARLY SHOW THE PADS AND THEIR |
| | DIMENSIONS SO STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO |
| | OBSTRUCTIONS. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE NEW PAD BY THE |
| | STADIUM DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM DIMENSION FOR EIGHT |
| | PARKING SPACES. |
| | |
| | GENERAL |
| | |
| | 13) THERE ARE STRAY ARROW LABELS POINTING TO LIGHT |
| | POLES ALONG CECIL AVENUE WHICH NO LONGER EXIST. |
| | |
| | 14) PLEASE REVIEW THE LAST FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMENT |
| | REGARDING THE ACCESS PATH TO THE STADIUM SEATING. |
| | |
| |
Print |
