| Date |
Text |
| 2017-10-20 16:46:23 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 |
| | PROJECT: KEISER U STADIUM Z17040019 |
| | OCTOBER 20, 2017 |
| | |
| | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND |
| | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE PRINTED COPIES OF THE TREE |
| | DISPOSITION CHART AND TREE MITIGATION CHART. |
| | |
| | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE TREE SURVEY AND TREE |
| | DISPOSITION PLAN FOR THE CECIL RD. ACCESS ROAD. |
| | |
| | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CURBS OR WHEEL STOPS IN |
| | PARKING AREAS ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE AREAS. |
| | PLEASE SHADE OR INDICATE THE PROPOSED SPACES TO BE |
| | GRASS ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED SHOWS CURBS AROUND THE |
| | LANDSCAPE AREAS. |
| | |
| | 4. SATISFIED. THE WAIVER FOR THE BUFFER REDUCTION HAS |
| | SEVERAL ITEMS THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED: |
| | ? THE DETENTION AREA PROPOSED WILL RESULT IN THE |
| | REMOVAL OF EXISTING TREES PROVIDING BUFFERING. IT |
| | SHOULD BE RELOCATED TO A DIFFERENT LOCATION. |
| | THE PROPOSED LOCATION NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID THE |
| | NARROW AREA IN THE BUFFER, AND SHOULD AVOID REMOVING |
| | ANY EXISTING TREES. DETENTION AREA ADDED ALONG CECIL |
| | ROAD WILL ALSO RESULT IN REMOVAL OF EXISTING TREES. |
| | ? ADDITIONAL TREES SHOULD BE ADDED TO PROVIDE MAXIMUM |
| | BUFFERING IN ORDER TO JUSTIFY THE REDUCED BUFFER. |
| | ADDITIONAL TREES PROPOSED ON THE SOUTH BUFFER ARE NOT |
| | SUFFICIENT TO JUSTIFY THE REDUCED BUFFER, RELOCATE |
| | DRAINAGE AREA AND ADD TREES. |
| | |
| | |
| | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE PRINTED COPIES OF THE |
| | STATEMENT REGARDING INVASIVE EXOTIC VEGETATION |
| | (SUBSECTION 18?). |
| | |
| | 6. SATISFIED. THE BUFFER REFERRED TO IN THE NARRATIVE |
| | BETWEEN THE PARKING TO THE NORTH AND THE SPORTS ARE |
| | DOES NOT HAVE A HEDGE EXISTING. PLEASE INDICATE IF IT |
| | WILL BE REPLACED ON THE PARKING LOT SIDE OR THE SPORTS |
| | FIELD SIDE. |
| | |
| | 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE |
| | BUFFERS ALONG THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF THE CECIL |
| | RD. ACCESS. |
| | |
| | 8. SATISFIED. THE GRASS PARKING AREAS INDICATED MAY NOT |
| | BE ALLOWED BY CODE. PLEASE PROVIDE PARKING LANDSCAPE TO |
| | MEET REQUIREMENTS. |
| | PLEASE SHADE OR INDICATE THE PROPOSED SPACES TO BE |
| | GRASS ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED SHOWS CURBS AROUND THE |
| | LANDSCAPE AREAS. |
| | |
| | 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON |
| | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. |
| | |
| | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS AND PROVIDE |
| | SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND |
| | UTILITIES INCLUDING FPL. |
| | |
| | 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT ITEM C IN THE FLORIDA |
| | FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS CHART TO REFER TO TREES, NOT |
| | GRASS. |
| | |
| | 12. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD THE WATER USE LEVEL TO THE |
| | PLANT LIST FOR EACH SPECIES, AND INDICATE NATIVE |
| | SPECIES. |
| | |
| | 13. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADDRESS HOW THE SPORTS FIELD |
| | ARTIFICIAL TURF WILL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-451. |
| | |
| | 14. SATISFIED. DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL IS PROVIDED, |
| | BUT LOCATION IS NOT SHOWN ON THE SITE OR LANDSCAPE |
| | PLAN. |
| | |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 7/21/17: |
| | |
| | 15. SATISFIED. THE ADA SPACES AND SIDEWALK THAT EXIST |
| | ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PRACTICE FIELD CONNECTING THE |
| | FACILITY TO THE MAIN WALKWAY NEAR THE STUDENT HOUSING |
| | WAS CONSTRUCTED LAST YEAR TO MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS AND |
| | AVOID DISTURBANCE OF EXISTING TREES. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE |
| | NEED TO RELOCATE THE ACCESS, POTENTIALLY NEGATIVELY |
| | AFFECTING EXISTING TREES AND UNDOING THE PREVIOUS |
| | ACCOMPLISHED SOLUTION. |
| | |
| | 16. SATISFIED. THE TREE MITIGATION CHART NEEDS TO BE |
| | CORRECTED TO REMOVE ANY MITIGATION REQUIREMENT FOR |
| | CARROTWOOD OR ALBIZIA, DUE TO THEM BEING CLASSIFIED AS |
| | INVASIVE EXOTICS. |
| | |
| | 17. SATISFIED. THE TREE PAYMENT IN LIEU CALCULATIONS |
| | NEED TO BE CORRECTED TO REFLECT THE ADDITION OF THE |
| | INSTALLATION COST FOR EACH TREE EQUAL TO THE TREE COST. |
| | (COST TIMES TWO). THE ADDITION OF MORE TREES ON SITE TO |
| | MITIGATE AND PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE REDUCED |
| | BUFFER WIDTH WAIVER FOR THE USE AND PARKING IS |
| | PREFERRED BY STAFF. |
| | THE CALCULATED PRICE OF $180.00 FOR THE 12 FOOT SLASH |
| | PINE IS ACTUALLY AVERAGING $130.00 X 2=$260.00 FOR THE |
| | AUGUST PLANTFINDER. PLEASE RECALCULATE MITIGATION. |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/20/2017: |
| | 18. THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS WERE CHANGED TO |
| | SATISFY THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS, BUT HAVE NOW REVERTED TO |
| | THE SAME CONDITION WITH THIS SUBMITTAL. THE DETENTION |
| | AREA ADJACENT TO THE REDUCED SOUTH BUFFER HAS |
| | REAPPEARED. PLEASE RELOCATE THE DETENTION AREA TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICT WITH EXISTING TREES AND IN ITS PLACE ADD TREES |
| | TO INCREASE THE BUFFER. THERE ARE SEVERAL LARGE LIVE |
| | OAK TREES THAT ARE PROPOSED TO BE DESTROYED. STAFF |
| | RECOMMENDS RELOCATING THEM TO THIS AREA TO PROVIDE AN |
| | ADEQUATE BUFFER TO COMPENSATE FOR THE REDUCED BUFFER |
| | WIDTH. THIS WILL REDUCE THE MITIGATION PAYMENT AS A |
| | BENEFIT. |
| | THIS IS ALSO REPEATED IN THE ZONING COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 19. ANY CHANGES PROPOSED FOR THE EXPANSION OR |
| | MODIFICATION OF THE NORTHERN PARKING AREAS WILL NEED TO |
| | HAVE LANDSCAPE PLANS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW THAT MEET |
| | CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 20. THE LAUREL OAKS LISTED AS BEING REMOVED ARE A |
| | CATEGORY ONE TREE, NOT A CATEGORY TWO. PLEASE REVISE. |
| | THIS WILL ALSO AFFECT MITIGATION DUE. |
| | |
| | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL |
| | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON |
| | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. |
| | |
| |
Print |
