| Date |
Text |
| 2017-09-26 16:29:14 | CASE NO. PB 1069U - 2ND RESUBMITTAL |
| | KEISER UNIVERSITY FOOTBALL STADIUM |
| | 2600 N. MILITARY TRAIL |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN |
| | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT DUE TO THE EXTENSIVE |
| | NUMBER OF COMMENTS, CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS OR |
| | THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS THE |
| | COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE RESUBMITTAL REVIEW COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY |
| | ADDRESSED AND SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 |
| | PM ON FRIDAY, OCTOBER 6, 2017, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE |
| | SCHEDULED FOR THE NOVEMBER 21, 2017 PLANNING BOARD |
| | MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM |
| | THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS (BY NOVEMBER 26, 2017), THE |
| | CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION |
| | SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 1) CONDITION: PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL, THE |
| | APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT THE "COVENANT TO |
| | MAINTAIN DRAINAGE" RECORDED IN ORB 2474 PG 687 HAS BEEN |
| | TERMINATED. |
| | |
| | SITE/MASTER PLANS |
| | |
| | 2) ALL THE PLANS INCORRECTLY CALL OUT CECEILE AVENUE AS |
| | CECIL AVENUE. |
| | |
| | 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THE NEW PARKING AREA ON THE NORTH |
| | SIDE OF THE SITE IS REQUIRED PARKING. NO SURVEY, CIVIL |
| | PLAN OR LANDSCAPE PLAN WAS PROVIDED FOR THE NEW PARKING |
| | AREA ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SITE. THE 117 PARKING |
| | SPACES WITHIN THIS PARKING FIELD ARE REQUIRED TO MEET |
| | THE MINIMUM 803 REQUIRED PARKING SPACES AFTER THE 30% |
| | DISCOUNT IS FACTORED IN FROM THE PROPOSED TEXT |
| | AMENDMENT. THE MEETING HELD PRIOR TO THE RESUBMITTAL |
| | DISCUSSED THAT THIS SUBMITTAL WOULD BE DONE AS IF THE |
| | PARKING TEXT AMENDMENT WAS APPROVED, SO SINCE THIS IS |
| | REQUIRED PARKING, IT NEEDS TO HAVE INFORMATION |
| | PRESENTED WITH THIS APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 4) PROVIDE THE SETBACK DIMENSIONS OF THE NEW PARKING |
| | AREA, BUS PARKING AND TURN-AROUND FROM THE PROPERTY |
| | LINES. PROVIDE THE WIDTH OF THE TURN-AROUND SPACE ON |
| | THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 5) SHOW THE POWERLINE POLES AND THE SPEED HUMPS ON THE |
| | MASTER PLAN. |
| | |
| | 6) CONNECT THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE VILLAGE COMMONS |
| | PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO THE INTERNAL SIDEWALK NETWORK |
| | INSTEAD OF HAVING IT DEAD-END INTO A PARKING LOT. ONE |
| | OF THE AERIALS SHOWS A WEAR PATTERN IN THE GRASS TO |
| | SUPPORT THE SIDEWALK CONTINUATION. |
| | |
| | 7) STAFF RECOMMENDS REDESIGNING SOME OF THE SPEED HUMPS |
| | TO SPEED TABLES THAT CAN DOUBLE AS ADA COMPLIANT |
| | WALKWAYS. |
| | |
| | 8) THE LIGHT POLES ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A 15 FOOT |
| | SETBACK FROM THE SIDE PROPERTY LINES UNLESS THE CITY |
| | COMMISSION GRANTS A WAIVER TO PERMIT THEM TO BE CLOSER. |
| | NO SETBACK DIMENSIONS ARE PROVIDED ON THE PLANS; |
| | HOWEVER, THE TWO POLES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CECEILE |
| | AVENUE SCALE AT 9 AND 13 FEET. THE CITY COMMISSION |
| | WOULD NEED TO GRANT A WAIVER FOR THESE POLE LOCATIONS. |
| | |
| | 9) CONDITION: THE PEDESTRIAN GATE WILL REQUIRE ACCESS |
| | FOR STUDENTS AND EMPLOYEES ALL THE TIME. ON GAME DAYS, |
| | A STAFF MEMBER IS REQUIRED TO ATTEND THE GATE TO |
| | PROVIDE ACCESS TO FANS. |
| | |
| | 10) REVISED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR REVISING THE |
| | DETENTION WITHIN THE AREA THAT IS PART OF THE REQUESTED |
| | 100 FOOT WAIVER. IN THE LAST MEETING BETWEEN THE |
| | APPLICANT AND STAFF, THIS AREA WAS NOT ONLY TO HAVE THE |
| | ONE ADDITIONAL OAK TREE PRESERVED, BUT ALSO SOME |
| | ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE INSTALLED TO CREATE A SOLID |
| | VEGETATIVE BARRIER TO THE RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PROPERTY |
| | TO THE SOUTH. STAFF HAS NOTED THAT THERE ARE |
| | DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE TREE SURVEY AND WHAT IS |
| | LABELED AS EXISTING TREES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. ALL |
| | EXISTING AND PROPOSED LANDSCAPE MUST BE ACCURATELY |
| | SHOWN. A MORE SUBSTANTIAL BUFFER PLANTING IS REQUIRED |
| | FOR STAFF TO SUPPORT THE WAIVER REQUEST. |
| | |
| | 11) CONDITION: PLEASE NOTE THAT THE FUTURE INSTALLATION |
| | OF CONCESSION AND MERCHANDISE STANDS OR BUILDINGS WILL |
| | REQUIRE THE PRIOR APPROVAL BY THE ZONING DIVISION IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN |
| | |
| | 12) A D-CURB IS REQUIRED TO PROTECT THE LANDSCAPE TO |
| | THE WEST OF THE NEW DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. |
| | |
| | 13) REPEAT COMMENT: THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND THE |
| | PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLAN SHOW DIFFERING CONDITIONS |
| | FOR THE INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ADJACENT TO THE |
| | GRASS PARKING SPACES. THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLAN |
| | DOES NOT CLEARLY SHOW THAT THE INTERIOR LANDSCAPE |
| | ISLANDS ARE PROTECTED FROM VEHICULAR ENCROACHMENT BY A |
| | D-CURB. WHEEL STOPS ARE PERMITTED TO BE USED AT THE |
| | HEAD OF THE SPACES AS DISCUSSED. |
| | |
| | 14) REPEAT COMMENT: THE TREE SURVEY, TO INCLUDE THE |
| | TREE MITIGATION PLAN, NEEDS TO INCLUDE THE AREAS |
| | SUBJECT TO THE NEW PARKING FIELD ON THE NORTH SIDE OF |
| | THE CAMPUS. |
| | |
| | 15) THE NEW BUS PARKING AND BUS TURN AROUND APPEARS TO |
| | REQUIRE THE REMOVAL OF TREES. PLEASE SHOW THE TREE |
| | SURVEY FOR THIS AREA. |
| | |
| | 16) THERE ARE NUMEROUS CONFLICTS BETWEEN PROPOSED LIGHT |
| | POLES AND TREES IN THE NEW PARKING ISLANDS NORTH OF THE |
| | ATHLETIC BUILDING. THE POLES MUST BE LOCATED AWAY FROM |
| | THE TREES. THEY MAY BE ABLE TO MOVE TO THE GAPS IN THE |
| | EXISTING BUFFER. |
| | |
| | PARKING |
| | |
| | 17) CONDITION AMENDMENT FROM RES. NO. 2-12: PARKING |
| | PROVISION REQUIREMENT TO BE BASED ON ENROLLMENT |
| | NUMBERS, NOT MAXIMUM ENROLLMENT. ANNUAL VERIFICATION IS |
| | REQUIRED FROM KEISER UNIVERSITY. SPECIFIC LANGUAGE IS |
| | STILL TO BE DRAFTED. |
| | |
| | 18) CONDITION AMENDMENT FROM RES. NO. 2-12: STAFF HAS |
| | DONE SOME RESEARCH ON ADJUNCT FACULTY AND WILL AGREE TO |
| | SPECIFICALLY PERMIT ADJUNCT FACULTY TO BE COUNTED AT A |
| | 1:2 RATIO. THIS NUMBER WILL NEED TO BE INCLUDED ON THE |
| | ANNUAL VERIFICATIONS. |
| | |
| | 19) REPEAT COMMENT: THE REQUIRED INTERIOR AND TERMINAL |
| | ISLAND LANDSCAPE (TREES) NEEDS TO BE SHOWN FOR EXISTING |
| | PARKING AREAS AND INSTALLED IF MISSING. NO LANDSCAPE |
| | PLAN WAS PROVIDED FOR THE EXISTING INTERIOR OR TERMINAL |
| | ISLANDS. |
| | |
| | 20) THANK YOU FOR RESTRIPING THE ADA SPACES TO INCLUDE |
| | ACCESS AISLES ADJACENT TO EACH PARKING SPACE. AFTER |
| | DISCUSSION WITH THE CITY'S CONSTRUCTION SERVICES |
| | DIVISION, THERE ARE STILL SOME ITEMS THAT NEED BE |
| | CORRECTED TO BRING THE EXISTING ADA SPACES INTO |
| | COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | A. THE EXISTING NORTHERN PARKING FIELD NEEDS TO HAVE AN |
| | ADA COMPLIANT PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION FROM THE SIDEWALK |
| | IN FRONT OF THE ADA PARKING SPACES, ACROSS THE DRIVE |
| | AISLE, DIRECTLY TO BUILDING NO. 2. |
| | B. THE RESTRIPED ADA PARKING SPACES BY BUILDING NOS. 8 |
| | AND 9 ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE |
| | BUILDINGS. PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE CURRENTLY EXISTS A |
| | SIDEWALK THAT IS NOT SHOWN ON THE MASTER PLAN THAT |
| | ALLOWS TIE IN. |
| | C. THE TWO ADA PARKING SPACES TO THE EAST OF THE DORMS |
| | NEED AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE EAST SIDE OF THE |
| | BUILDING. |
| | D. THE TWO ADA PARKING SPACES ADJACENT TO THE SOFTBALL |
| | FIELD NEED TO PROVIDE AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE |
| | SOFTBALL AND BASEBALL SEATING AS WELL AS THE SIDEWALK |
| | ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE DORMS. |
| | |
| | 21) PLEASE EXPLAIN WHO PARKS IN THE 3 PARKING SPACES |
| | NEXT TO BUILDING NO. 1. THESE ARE THE CLOSEST SPACES TO |
| | THE BUILDING, SO IF THEY ARE USED FOR OPEN PARKING, |
| | THEY NEED TO INCLUDE AN ADA PARKING SPACE. |
| | |
| | 22) THE NORTHERN ROW OF PARKING SPACES AT THE EXISTING |
| | MAIN PARKING AREA CURRENTLY CONTAINS 20 PARKING SPACES |
| | AS SHOWN ON THE AERIAL. THE PLANS SHOW THIS AS 19 |
| | PARKING SPACES AT 9 FEET IN WIDTH. STAFF SUGGESTS |
| | KEEPING IT AT 20 PARKING SPACES (8.5 FEET IN WIDTH). |
| | THERE IS ONE FOOT LEFT OVER THAT CAN BE ABSORBED IN THE |
| | 20 SPACES. |
| | |
| | 23) PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE NEW NORTHERN PARKING AREA IS |
| | BEING PROPOSED WITH 26 FOOT WIDE DRIVE AISLES. THE CITY |
| | ONLY REQUIRES 24 FEET WIDTH. REDUCING PAVEMENT IS |
| | BENEFICIAL TO THE SITE. |
| | |
| | 24) THE NEW NORTHERN PARKING FIELD IS CONSIDERED A |
| | SEPARATE PARKING AREA AND NEEDS TO MEET THE ADA PARKING |
| | REQUIREMENT FOR 117 SPACES, WHICH REQUIRES 5 ADA |
| | PARKING SPACES. PLEASE NOTE THAT THESE THREE ADDITIONAL |
| | SPACES CAN BE NEW OR RELOCATED FROM THE EXISTING |
| | NORTHERN LOT (ONE EXTRA SPACE SHOWN) AND THE SPACES |
| | WEST OF BUILDING NOS. 8 AND 9 (TWO EXTRA SPACES SHOWN) |
| | |
| | 25) THE PARKING BAY IMMEDIATELY NORTHEAST OF THE NEW |
| | ATHLETIC BUILDING IS MISLABELED AS ONLY HAVING 8 AND |
| | NOT 10 PARKING SPACES ON SHEET MP.5. |
| | |
| | 26) THE LANDSCAPE AREAS ADJACENT TO THE NEW NORTHERN |
| | PARKING AREA, THE BUS PARKING AND THE BUS TURN AROUND |
| | AREAS MUST BE SEPARATED FROM TYPE D CURBS. THIS IS NOT |
| | CLEARLY SHOWN ON THE PLANS, AND IN SOME INSTANCES LOOKS |
| | AS IF THERE IS NO CURBING PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 27) CONDITION: ALL PARKING SPACES WITHIN ANY PARKING |
| | ROW WHICH HAS ANY RESTRIPING OR OTHER MODIFICATION MUST |
| | BE RESTRIPED TO COMPLY WITH CITY STANDARDS AT THE TIME |
| | OF RESTRIPING OR MODIFICATION. IN ANY EVENT, ALL |
| | PARKING SPACES NEED TO BE STRIPED TO MEET CITY |
| | STANDARDS BY DECEMBER 31, 2020. |
| | |
| | BICYCLE PARKING |
| | |
| | 28) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PLANS SHALL CLEARLY SHOW THE |
| | BICYCLE PAD DIMENSIONS AND RACKS IN CONFORMANCE WITH |
| | CITY STANDARDS AS WELL AS PROVIDE A DETAIL SHEET |
| | SHOWING THE ACTUAL PAD AND RACK DIMENSIONS. |
| | |
| | A. THE PLANS DO NOT SHOW THE DIMENSIONS OF THE EXISTING |
| | BICYCLE RACKS NOR ARE DETAILS PROVIDED OF THE SPECIFIC |
| | RACKS TO ALLOW STAFF TO VERIFY THAT THERE ARE 60 |
| | EXISTING SPACES. |
| | B. THE NEW BICYCLE DETAIL SHOWN ON SHEET RP.1 ONLY |
| | SHOWS THE RACK AND DOES NOT INCLUDE THE PAD THAT THE |
| | RACK WILL BE INSTALLED ON. THE DETAIL MUST SHOW THE |
| | PAD, WITH THE CORRECT DIMENSIONS FOR AN 8 BICYCLE RACK |
| | (WIDTH 11.5 FEET X DEPTH 6 FEET). THE PLANS MUST ALSO |
| | INCLUDE THE PAD TO SCALE WITH THE ACCURATE DIMENSIONS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
