| Plan Review Notes For Project Z17040019 |
| Project Number |
Z17040019 |
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
| Sequence Number |
3 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2017-09-19 13:13:52 | THIS REVIEW IS CONCEPTUAL AS CONSTRUCTION LEVEL DETAILS | | | WERE NOT PROVIDED. THE COMMENTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: | | | | | | 1) CECIL AVENUE - A 5' WIDE SIDEWALK IS SHOWN ADJACENT | | | TO THE EDGE OF TRAVEL LANE. THE PROPOSED 5' WID | | | SIDEWALK DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM STANDARDS CONTAINED | | | IN THE MANUAL OF UNIFORM STANDARD FOR DESIGN, | | | CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE FOR STREETS AND HIGHWAYS. | | | (A.K.A. FLORIDA GREENBOOK). THE MINIMUM WIDTH FOR A | | | SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO A CURB IS 6' WIDE, (SECTION 8B.1 | | | FLORIDA GREENBOOK). | | | | | | 2) THE PLAN IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE TRANSPORTATION | | | ELEMENT VISION FOR "INCREASED USE OF BICYCLE AND | | | PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES AS A VIABLE ALTERNATE MEANS OF | | | TRANSPORATION TO THE AUTOMOBILE." THERE DOESN'T APPEAR | | | TO BE ANY BICYCLE FACILITIES PROVIDED FROM THE CAMPUS | | | TO MILITARY TRAIL. IT WOULD BE BENEFICIAL TO CONSTRUCT | | | A WIDER MULTIMODAL TRAIL ALONG CECIL AVENUE OR AT | | | ANOTHER LOCATION TO CONNECT TO MILITARY TRAIL. THE | | | TRIPS LENGTH LEAVING CAMPUS IS MORE CONDUCIVE TO BIKING | | | THAN WALKING AND ONLY CONSTRUCTING A SIDEWALK WILL NOT | | | ADDRESS THE NEED TO PROVIDE BICYCLE FACILITIES. | | | | | | 3) THE 25' PAVEMENT WIDTH FOR CECIL AVENUE APPEARS | | | EXCESSIVE. CONSIDER REDUCING THE PAVEMENT WIDTH. | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E. | | | SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
| |
Print |
|
