| Date |
Text |
| 2017-07-24 11:15:21 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER |
| | PROJECT: KEISER U STADIUM Z17040019 |
| | JULY 21, 2017 |
| | |
| | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND |
| | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE PRINTED COPIES OF THE TREE |
| | DISPOSITION CHART AND TREE MITIGATION CHART. |
| | |
| | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE TREE SURVEY AND TREE |
| | DISPOSITION PLAN FOR THE CECIL RD. ACCESS ROAD. |
| | |
| | 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CURBS OR WHEEL |
| | STOPS IN PARKING AREAS ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE AREAS. |
| | PLEASE SHADE OR INDICATE THE PROPOSED SPACES TO BE |
| | GRASS ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED SHOWS CURBS AROUND THE |
| | LANDSCAPE AREAS. |
| | |
| | 4. NOT SATISFIED. THE WAIVER FOR THE BUFFER REDUCTION |
| | HAS SEVERAL ITEMS THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED: |
| | ? THE DETENTION AREA PROPOSED WILL RESULT IN THE |
| | REMOVAL OF EXISTING TREES PROVIDING BUFFERING. IT |
| | SHOULD BE RELOCATED TO A DIFFERENT LOCATION. |
| | THE PROPOSED LOCATION NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID THE |
| | NARROW AREA IN THE BUFFER, AND SHOULD AVOID REMOVING |
| | ANY EXISTING TREES. DETENTION AREA ADDED ALONG CECIL |
| | ROAD WILL ALSO RESULT IN REMOVAL OF EXISTING TREES. |
| | ? ADDITIONAL TREES SHOULD BE ADDED TO PROVIDE MAXIMUM |
| | BUFFERING IN ORDER TO JUSTIFY THE REDUCED BUFFER. |
| | ADDITIONAL TREES PROPOSED ON THE SOUTH BUFFER ARE NOT |
| | SUFFICIENT TO JUSTIFY THE REDUCED BUFFER, RELOCATE |
| | DRAINAGE AREA AND ADD TREES. |
| | |
| | |
| | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE PRINTED COPIES OF THE |
| | STATEMENT REGARDING INVASIVE EXOTIC VEGETATION |
| | (SUBSECTION 18?). |
| | |
| | 6. SATISFIED. THE BUFFER REFERRED TO IN THE NARRATIVE |
| | BETWEEN THE PARKING TO THE NORTH AND THE SPORTS ARE |
| | DOES NOT HAVE A HEDGE EXISTING. PLEASE INDICATE IF IT |
| | WILL BE REPLACED ON THE PARKING LOT SIDE OR THE SPORTS |
| | FIELD SIDE. |
| | |
| | 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE |
| | BUFFERS ALONG THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF THE CECIL |
| | RD. ACCESS. |
| | |
| | 8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE GRASS PARKING AREAS |
| | INDICATED MAY NOT BE ALLOWED BY CODE. PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | PARKING LANDSCAPE TO MEET REQUIREMENTS. |
| | PLEASE SHADE OR INDICATE THE PROPOSED SPACES TO BE |
| | GRASS ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED SHOWS CURBS AROUND THE |
| | LANDSCAPE AREAS. |
| | |
| | 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON |
| | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. |
| | |
| | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS AND PROVIDE |
| | SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND |
| | UTILITIES INCLUDING FPL. |
| | |
| | 11. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT ITEM C IN THE FLORIDA |
| | FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS CHART TO REFER TO TREES, NOT |
| | GRASS. |
| | |
| | 12. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD THE WATER USE LEVEL TO THE |
| | PLANT LIST FOR EACH SPECIES, AND INDICATE NATIVE |
| | SPECIES. |
| | |
| | 13. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADDRESS HOW THE SPORTS FIELD |
| | ARTIFICIAL TURF WILL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-451. |
| | |
| | 14. SATISFIED. DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL IS PROVIDED, |
| | BUT LOCATION IS NOT SHOWN ON THE SITE OR LANDSCAPE |
| | PLAN. |
| | |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 7/21/17: |
| | |
| | 15. THE ADA SPACES AND SIDEWALK THAT EXIST ON THE NORTH |
| | SIDE OF THE PRACTICE FIELD CONNECTING THE FACILITY TO |
| | THE MAIN WALKWAY NEAR THE STUDENT HOUSING WAS |
| | CONSTRUCTED LAST YEAR TO MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS AND |
| | AVOID DISTURBANCE OF EXISTING TREES. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE |
| | NEED TO RELOCATE THE ACCESS, POTENTIALLY NEGATIVELY |
| | AFFECTING EXISTING TREES AND UNDOING THE PREVIOUS |
| | ACCOMPLISHED SOLUTION. |
| | |
| | 16. THE TREE MITIGATION CHART NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED TO |
| | REMOVE ANY MITIGATION REQUIREMENT FOR CARROTWOOD OR |
| | ALBIZIA, DUE TO THEM BEING CLASSIFIED AS INVASIVE |
| | EXOTICS. |
| | |
| | 17. THE TREE PAYMENT IN LIEU CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE |
| | CORRECTED TO REFLECT THE ADDITION OF THE INSTALLATION |
| | COST FOR EACH TREE EQUAL TO THE TREE COST. (COST TIMES |
| | TWO). THE ADDITION OF MORE TREES ON SITE TO MITIGATE |
| | AND PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE REDUCED BUFFER WIDTH |
| | WAIVER FOR THE USE AND PARKING IS PREFERRED BY STAFF |
| | |
| | |
| | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL |
| | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON |
| | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. |
| | |
| |
Print |
