| Date |
Text |
| 2017-05-10 12:29:36 | CASE NO. PB 1069U |
| | KEISER UNIVERSITY FOOTBALL STADIUM |
| | 2600 N. MILITARY TRAIL |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN |
| | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT DUE TO THE EXTENSIVE |
| | NUMBER OF COMMENTS, CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS OR |
| | THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS THE |
| | COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, |
| | MAY 26, 2017, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE |
| | JULY 18, 2017 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY JULY 10, 2017), |
| | THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER |
| | ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 1) THE SURVEY NEEDS TO SHOW THE PROTRUDING FINGER OF |
| | PROPERTY ALL THE WAY TO MILITARY TRAIL, INCLUDING ANY |
| | EASEMENTS, ENCUMBRANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS. |
| | |
| | 2) PLEASE PROVIDE AN UPDATE ON THE STATUS OF THE ROAD |
| | EASEMENT TO DALE ALEXANDER. CAN THIS BE ABANDONED? |
| | |
| | 3) PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | THAT THEY APPROVE OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN |
| | THE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT AREA RECORDED IN ORB |
| | 4723 PG 1643. |
| | |
| | 4) PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM THE FLORIDA |
| | DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) THAT THE |
| | IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN WITHIN THE FDOT TRANSFER OF |
| | RESERVATION PARCEL NO. 801 DO NOT INTERFERE WITH THEIR |
| | FUTURE NEED OF THE PARCEL. |
| | |
| | 5) PROVIDE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLANS, TO INCLUDE |
| | PAVING AND DRAINAGE AND WATER AND SEWER PLANS. |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN |
| | |
| | 6) THE PLAN SHOWN ON SHEET PSP.1 SHALL BE PROVIDED AT A |
| | LARGER SCALE THAN 1 INCH = 80 FEET. |
| | |
| | 7) IN ACCORDANCE WITH RESOLUTION NO. 2-12, THE REQUIRED |
| | PARKING FOR THE CAMPUS NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED. THE |
| | SUBMITTED PLANS DO NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. WHILE THE |
| | PARKING TABLE LISTS THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING |
| | SPACES, IT FAILS TO LIST THE NUMBER OF PROVIDED PARKING |
| | SPACES, TO INCLUDE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED |
| | ADA PARKING SPACES. ADDITIONALLY, THE MASTER PLAN DOES |
| | NOT SHOW THE EXISTING PARKING OR THE ADDITIONAL PARKING |
| | TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONDITION OF RESOLUTION |
| | NO. 2-12. |
| | |
| | 8) THE DATA TABLES MUST BE UPDATED TO SHOW THE NUMBER |
| | OF DORMS ON CAMPUS AND HOW MANY SEATS ARE IN THE |
| | STADIUM. |
| | |
| | 9) PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THE RECONFIGURED DRIVEWAY |
| | BETWEEN THE DORM PARKING LOT AND THE STADIUM DRIVEWAY. |
| | |
| | 10) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT MENTIONS THAT THERE IS |
| | PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION WHICH IS SEPARATED FROM THE |
| | VEHICULAR CIRCULATION SYSTEM. THIS IS NOT REFLECTED ON |
| | THE SITE PLAN. PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALK |
| | NETWORK THAT DOES NOT FORCE THE USER TO CUT DIAGONALLY |
| | ACROSS THE DRIVE AISLE (AS IT CURRENTLY DOES TO ACCESS |
| | THE GOLF AREA. ADDITIONALLY A SIDEWALK IS REQUIRED TO |
| | CONNECT TO THE MILITARY TRAIL BUS ROUTE(S). |
| | |
| | 11) PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED FIELD LIGHTS AND |
| | SCOREBOARD, TO INCLUDE THE HEIGHT. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE |
| | CSPD DISTRICT PERMITS A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 80 FEET. |
| | NOTE: THE LIGHT POLES MAY BE ATTRACTIVE TO CELLULAR |
| | COMPANIES AS ANTENNA SITES. |
| | |
| | 12) THE PLANS CALL OUT FIELD LIGHTS. THIS IMPLIES THAT |
| | THERE WILL BE EVENING AND NIGHT GAMES. SHOW HOW THERE |
| | WILL BE ILLUMINATION OF THE PARKING AREAS AND CECEILE |
| | AVENUE FOR THE SAFETY OF FANS LEAVING THE GAME. |
| | |
| | 13) PROVIDE THE PHOTOMETRIC PLANS FOR THE BOUNDARIES OF |
| | THE SITE ADJACENT TO THE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS AND THE |
| | MILITARY TRAIL ROW TO VERIFY THAT THE LIGHT FIXTURES DO |
| | NOT CREATE GLARE (NO MORE THAN 0.5 FOOTCANDLES IN |
| | RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS) ONTO THOSE PROPERTIES. |
| | |
| | 14) THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DOES NOT MEET CITY |
| | MINIMUM SIZE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 15) THE APPLICATION IS REQUESTING A WAIVER FROM THE |
| | REQUIREMENT THAT, "ALL SITES SHALL CONTAIN AT LEAST A |
| | 100-FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPED, OPEN SPACE BUFFER ADJACENT TO |
| | ALL RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS." THE JUSTIFICATION |
| | STATEMENT CLAIMS THAT THE REDUCED AREA INCLUDES |
| | LANDSCAPING AND AN EXISTING FENCE TO SCREEN, BUFFER AND |
| | ABSORB SOUNDS AND LIGHT FROM THE STADIUM. THE EXISTING |
| | SIX FOOT HIGH FENCE IS CHAIN LINK, WHICH WILL PROVIDE |
| | NO SOUND OR LIGHT BUFFERING. THE LANDSCAPE INCLUDES A |
| | 35 FOOT WIDE DRY DETENTION AREA WITH THE PHYSICAL |
| | LANDSCAPE BUFFER CONSISTING OF A FEW RECENTLY PLANTED |
| | OAK TREES AND SABLE PALM GROUPINGS. THIS IS |
| | INSUFFICIENT LANDSCAPE TO MITIGATE THE BUFFER |
| | REDUCTION. |
| | |
| | 16) NO JUSTIFICATION WAS SHOWN FOR THE FOLLOWING |
| | STANDARD THAT REQUIRES A WAIVER, "ALL OUTDOOR ACTIVITY |
| | AREAS: 100 FEET FROM ANY PROPERTY LINE." |
| | |
| | 17) PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE BLEACHERS, TO INCLUDE |
| | HEIGHT AND ELEVATIONS. |
| | |
| | 18) WHERE ARE THE CONCESSION AND MERCHANDISE STANDS? |
| | |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN |
| | |
| | 19) THE TREE SURVEY WAS NOT PROVIDED IN PAPER FORM. THE |
| | REVIEW OF THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THE TREE SURVEY |
| | DOES NOT SHOW THE ENTIRE LIMITS OF WORK. |
| | |
| | 20) THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS REQUIRE |
| | THAT, "ALL SITES SHALL CONTAIN AT LEAST A 100-FOOT WIDE |
| | LANDSCAPED, OPEN SPACE BUFFER ADJACENT TO ALL |
| | RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS." THE ONE ROW OF 49 BUFFER |
| | TREES, SPACED 30 FEET APART, DO NOT MEET THE STANDARD |
| | OF A 100 FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER TO SERVE AS |
| | SCREENING. |
| | |
| | 21) THE PROPERTY LINES ALONG THE NORTH, SOUTH AND WEST |
| | SIDES OF THE FINGER PROTRUDING TO MILITARY TRAIL (AREA |
| | CONTAINING CECEILE AVENUE) ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH |
| | THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE |
| | REGULATIONS. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS NO LANDSCAPE IN |
| | THESE AREAS. THE DRY RETENTION AREA AND SOD DO NOT MEET |
| | THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 22) THE PROVIDED PLANS DO NOT CLEARLY SHOW THAT THE |
| | LANDSCAPE AREAS PROTECTED FROM VEHICULAR ENCROACHMENT |
| | BY A D-CURB. |
| | |
| | 23) THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FAILS TO SHOW THE REQUIRED |
| | LANDSCAPE AROUND THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. |
| | |
| | 24) NO TREES ARE SHOWN IN THE TERMINAL ISLANDS AT |
| | EITHER SIDE OF THE REVISED DRIVEWAY BETWEEN THE DORM |
| | PARKING LOT AND THE STADIUM DRIVEWAY. |
| | |
| | 25) THE GRASS PARKING IS REQUIRED TO HAVE INTERIOR AND |
| | TERMINAL TREES IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY'S PARKING |
| | STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | PARKING |
| | |
| | 26) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT STATES THAT THE REQUEST |
| | IS TO RECALCULATE THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS. THE PARKING |
| | TABLE LOCATED IN ARTICLE XV OF THE ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS DICTATES THE PARKING REQUIRED |
| | FOR A USE. BASED ON THE MAXIMUM 1,800 STUDENT COUNT, |
| | THE FACULTY COUNT AND THE NUMBER OF ASSEMBLY SEATS |
| | PROVIDED TO THE CITY AS PART OF THE LAST MAJOR |
| | AMENDMENT, THE REQUIRED PARKING IS 2,615 PARKING |
| | SPACES. STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AS |
| | PART OF THE PARKING STUDY; HOWEVER, PARKING |
| | REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT BASED ON OBSERVATION OF CURRENT |
| | CONDITIONS OR THE ITE PARKING MANUAL, BUT THE CITY'S |
| | PARKING REQUIREMENTS. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE WITH THE |
| | PARKING REQUIREMENTS OUTLINED IN THE ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, YOU ARE WELCOME TO APPLY FOR A |
| | CODE TEXT AMENDMENT, WHICH IF APPROVED, WOULD APPLY TO |
| | ALL SCHOOLS, COLLEGES, AND UNIVERSITIES: PUBLIC/PRIVATE |
| | WITHIN THE CITY. THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS DO NOT PERMIT THE REDUCTION OF PARKING AT |
| | THIS LOCATION; THEREFORE, THE CITY CANNOT ADOPT A |
| | PARKING STUDY THAT DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ARGUMENTS YOU MAKE IN |
| | FAVOR OF THE PARKING RECALCULATION ARE ONES THAT YOU |
| | MAY INCLUDE WITH A CODE TEXT AMENDMENT. |
| | |
| | 27) THE STADIUM REQUIRES 305 PARKING SPACES, YET ONLY |
| | 220 NEW PARKING SPACES ARE PROPOSED FOR THE STADIUM. |
| | |
| | 28) THE PROPOSED GRASS PARKING REQUIRES CITY COMMISSION |
| | APPROVAL AS A WAIVER TO THE CSPD. PROVIDE COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE WAIVER STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | 29) THE NEWLY PROPOSED PARKING ALONG CECEILE AVENUE |
| | DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING STADIUM ADDITIONAL |
| | STANDARD, "ALL PARKING, LOADING, AND VEHICULAR |
| | CIRCULATION AREAS: 100 FEET FROM ANY PROPERTY LINE." |
| | |
| | 30) THE PARKING DETAIL ON SHEET PSP.1 DOES NOT MEET THE |
| | CITY STANDARD. |
| | |
| | 31) NO PARKING DETAIL WAS PROVIDED FOR THE PARALLEL |
| | PARKING SPACES. PLEASE PROVIDE THE END OF EACH ROW WITH |
| | A 45 DEGREE ANGLE FOR EASE IN PARKING. |
| | |
| | 32) THE EASTERN TEN PARALLEL SPACES DO NOT FUNCTION AS |
| | THERE IS NO TURN AROUND AT THE DEAD END FOR ANYONE |
| | WISHING TO USE THE PARKING SPACES. |
| | |
| | 33) NO ADA PARKING SPACES WERE PROVIDED FOR THE |
| | STADIUM. |
| | |
| | 34) BICYCLE PARKING IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 35) THE NEW ATHLETIC BUILDING REQUIRES ONE 10 FOOT BY |
| | 25 FOOT LOADING SPACE. |
| | |
| | 36) WHERE WILL THE TEAM BUSSES UNLOAD AND PARK? PROVIDE |
| | TURNING RADIUS DRAWINGS TO SHOW HOW THE BUSSES WILL |
| | NEGOTIATE ENTERING AND THEN LEAVING THE SITE. |
| | |
| | TRAFFIC |
| | |
| | 37) WHILE THE TRAFFIC STATEMENT INDICATES THAT THERE |
| | WILL BE NO ADDITIONAL PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIPS BASED ON |
| | THE NEW STADIUM, YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC APPROVAL LETTER WITH THE |
| | APPLICATION. PALM BEACH COUNTY MAKES THE DETERMINATION |
| | IF THE STADIUM IS INCLUDED IN THE APPROVAL OF THE 1,800 |
| | STUDENT CAMPUS. |
| | |
| | 38) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT PROVIDES THAT THE SITE |
| | WILL BE DIRECTLY ACCESSED FROM MILITARY TRAIL VIA |
| | CECEILE AVENUE. PROVIDE A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR THE |
| | ACCESS POINT AND DEMONSTRATE HOW THIS IS A SAFE ACCESS |
| | POINT FOR GAME DAY TRAFFIC, VERIFIED BY PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY/FDOT, TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARD THAT, |
| | "ADEQUATE TRAFFIC FACILITIES, SUCH AS INTERSECTION |
| | IMPROVEMENTS, TURN LANES, ACCELERATION LANES, |
| | SIGNALIZATION, ETC., SHALL BE PROVIDED TO MINIMIZE THE |
| | IMPACTS OF THE FACILITY ON ADJACENT PUBLIC |
| | THOROUGHFARES." STAFF NOTES THAT THE PROPOSED |
| | WESTERNMOST GRASS PARKING SPACES WILL CREATE A BACKUP |
| | FOR ANYONE ENTERING THE SITE FROM MILITARY TRAIL. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
