| Date |
Text |
| 2019-02-28 10:44:38 | OUTSTANTING COMMENTS FROM 5/11/17 REVIEW: |
| | 4.NOT SATISFIED- PROPOSED CURB CUT ON 4TH STREET |
| | EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM 25 FEEET IN WIDTH ALLOWED. THE 6 |
| | FOOT WIDE MEDIAN IS STILL CONSIDERED PART OF THE CURB |
| | CUT. |
| | 7 AND 8. SATISFIED |
| | 9. NOT SATISFIED- CIVIL DRAWINGS (SHEET 9) SHOW RETAIL |
| | AREA AT ELEVATION 15.50 WHILE SIDEWALK IS AT ELEVATION |
| | APPROX. 12-13. SHEET 4 SHOWS RETAIL AT ELEVATION 13. |
| | |
| | OUTSTANDING COMMENTS FROM 11/27/19 REVIEW |
| | 1. SATISFIED |
| | 2. SATISFIED- PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED ELEVATIONS WITHOUT |
| | SHADES TO CLEARLY CONVEY THE DIFFERENT MATERIALS OF THE |
| | ELEVATION. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE |
| | BETWEEN THE PREVIOUS FACADE DETAIL AND THE PROPOSED. |
| | 3. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE CONSIDE LOCATING THE FIRE |
| | DEPARTMENT CONNECTION ON THE STAIR WALL OR LOCATE THEM |
| | CLOSER TO THE STAIR WALL. TEH FDC CONNECTION ON 4TH |
| | STREET IS ALSO LOCATED ON THE PEDESTRIAN PATH AREA. |
| | 4. SATISFIED- PRINTING FOR LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS WAS NOT |
| | DONE TO PRESERVE THE SCALE. STAFF WAS NOT ABLE TO |
| | MEASURE INDICATED DIMENSIONS. |
| | 5. NOT SATISFIED - LANDSCAPE MATERIALS HAVE |
| | SUBSTANTIALLY CHANGED FROM ORIGINAL APPROVAL IN |
| | DETRIMENT OF THE QUALITY OF THE PUBLIC REALM. SEE |
| | LANDSCAPE COMMENTS. |
| | 6. SATISFIED- PLEASE DIMENSION PARKING SPACES TO |
| | CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. SPACE |
| | ADJACENT TO A WALL OR COLUMN SHALL BE WIDER (SEC |
| | 94-111(C)) |
| | 7. NOT SATISFIED- PLEASE PROVIDE SECTIONS TO CONFIRM |
| | THE LEVELS ARE MAINTAINED . CURB CUT SHALL BE DESIGNED |
| | IN A WAY THAT THE SIDEWALK LEVEL IS MAINTAINED ACROSS |
| | CURB CUT AND NOT LOWERED TO THE ROAD LEVEL. PEDESTRIANS |
| | GET PRIORITY, NOT THE CARS. |
| | 8. NOT SATISFIED- TABLE PROVIED INDICATES THAT 25 UNITS |
| | ARE BELOW THE MINIMUM 550 SF UNIT SIZE PERMITTED BY THE |
| | CODE FOR REGUALR UNITS. THOSE UNITS SHALL BE CLASSIFIED |
| | AS MICRO UNITS AND MUST COMPLY WITH SPECIFIC MICROUNIT |
| | REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE SEE SECTION 94 106 (8A) AND |
| | RESPOND HOW THE PROJECT IS GOING TO ADDRESS THE |
| | SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS. |
| | 9. NOT SATISFIED - TABLE PROVIDED INDICATES 8 HOTEL |
| | ROOMS ARE LESS THAN THE 350 SF REQUIRED FOR FULL |
| | SERVICE HOTELS. |
| | 10. SATISFIED-PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE CAR |
| | LIFTS. |
| | 11. SATISFIED- PLEASE INDICATE THE TENANT ACCESS TO THE |
| | BIKE STORAGE ROOM. |
| | |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM 1/28/19 SUBMITTAL: |
| | 1. PLEASE CORRECT THE FAR NUMBER IN SHEET A0.0A AND |
| | A0.07, THE TWO NUMBERS DO NOT MATCH. |
| | 2.PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AT THE CORNER OF 4RD AND DIXIE |
| | HWAY SHALL BE SPLIT INTO TWO DIRECTIONAL RAMPS. |
| | 3. THERE ARE TWO BIKE RACKS INDICATED ON THE OFFICE |
| | PLAZA THAT CONFLICT WITH THE WATER FEATURE PROPOSE AND |
| | THE PATH OF TRAVEL FOR PEDESTRIANS. PLEASE RELOCATE. |
| | 4.LIGHT POLES INDICATED IN SHEETL1-150 SHALL MEET THE |
| | DOWNTOWN CITY STANDARD FOR POLE AND FIXTURE. |
| | 5. A LIGHTING PROTOMETRIC SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR THE |
| | EXTERIOR GROUND FLOOR AREA TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | THE MINIMUM REQUIRED 0.6 FOOTCANDLES AT THE CURB SIDE |
| | ONE FOOT ABOVE GROUND. |
| | 6. PLEASE SUBMIT DETAILS FOR THE BIKE RACKS TO CONFIRM |
| | SPACE PROVIDED IS ADEQUATE. |
| | 7. PLEASE CONFIRM THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH WILL NOT |
| | CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED TREES ALONG DIXIE HWAY. |
| | 8. PLEASE RECONSIDER PROPOSED GREESE TRAP UNDER HOTEL |
| | OUTDOOR DINING AREA. |
| | |
| | FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA |
| | APONTE AT 561-822-1439 |
| | |
| |
Print |
