| Date |
Text |
| 2017-04-25 13:04:46 | APRIL 25,2017 REVIEW: |
| | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE PLANAR BREAK REGULATION ACCORDING TO TABLE |
| | IV-4. |
| | 2. RESTAURANT PLANTER NEXT TO STAIR AT CORNER OF |
| | FLAGLER AND BANYAN IS ENCROACHING INTO THE MINIMUM |
| | SETBACK RESULTING IN A NARROW SIDEWALK. PLEASE REDUCE |
| | THE SIZE OF PLANTER TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM 6' CLEAR |
| | SIDEWALK. |
| | 3. SIDEWALK ELEVATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED ACROSS ALL |
| | CURB CUTS. PLEASE PROVIDE A SECTION TO COMFIRM |
| | COMPLIANCE. MATERIAL OF SIDEWALK SHALL BE MAINTAINED |
| | ACROSS DRIVEWAY. |
| | 4. BANYAN BOULEVARD REDESIGN NEEDED AS FOLLOWS: MINIMUM |
| | 10' TRAVEL LANES. NEW BULB OUT ON NORTH SIDE AT OLIVE |
| | AVE AND BANYAN TO ALLOW FOR NEW ON-STREET PARKING ALONG |
| | NORTH SIDE OF BANYAN BETWEEN OLIVE AVE AND GARAGE |
| | ENTRANCE. BULB OUT AT NARCISSUS EXTENDED TO THE GARAGE |
| | ENTRANCE (LANDSCAPE). |
| | 5. BANYAN BLVD AND FLAGLER DRIVE REDESIGN NEEDED TO |
| | ACCOMMODATE BETTER SPACE FOR PEDESTRIANS.TRAFFIC STUDY |
| | WILL DETERMINE IF THE DEDICATED RIGHT TURN LANE AT |
| | BANYAN AND FLAGLER IS NECESSARY. INTERSECTION TO BE |
| | MODIFIED AS A 90 DEGREE INTERSECTION. (PLEASE SEE |
| | TRAFFIC COMMENTS) |
| | 6. PROPOSED 2ND STREET ALIGNMENT CAN BE REDUCED TO 20' |
| | TRAVEL LANES PLUS GUTTER. THE EXISTIGN PORTION OF 2ND |
| | STREET WEST OF NARCISSUS CAN BE MAINTAINED AS EXIST TO |
| | ALLOW THE ON-STREET PARKING ON THE NORTH SIDE. |
| | 7. SIDEWALK ON EAST SIDE OF NARCISSUS SHALL BE WIDENED |
| | TO ALLOW FOR A MINIMUM OF 6' CLEAR PATH WHEN ADJACENT |
| | TO TREE GRATES OR PLANTING AREAS, WITH THE MAJORITY OF |
| | THE SIDEWALK TO BE A MINIMUM OF 8'. |
| | 8. PROPOSED PLANTING AREA AT RESTAURANT ARCADE IS GOING |
| | OVER SIDEWALK. |
| | 9. TO ADVANCE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GELH STUDY |
| | RECENTLY COMPLETED, STAFF IS REQUESTING SHADE TREES TO |
| | BE INSTALLED ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE BETWEEN THE ROYAL |
| | PALMS (PLEASE SEE LANDSCAPE COMMENTS) TREE GRATES SHALL |
| | BE MOVED NEXT TO THE CURB. |
| | 10. ARE THE PARKING SPACES DESIGNATED? PLEASE MARK THE |
| | GUEST PARKING SPACES FOR THE RESIDENTIAL COMPONENT AND |
| | THE PARKING FOR THE RETAIL COMPONENT TO AVOID THOSE |
| | SPACES TO BE PERMANENTLY ASSIGNED TO RESIDENTIAL UNITS. |
| | 11. WERE IS THE GARBAGE COLLECTION FOR THE HOTEL? IS IT |
| | AT THE SAME LOCATION THAN THE RESIDENTIAL (LOADING |
| | AREA)? |
| | 12. FOR THE DAC REVIEW PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED |
| | ELEVATIONS (ALL THE BUILDINGS IN THE PROJECT). IN |
| | ADDITION PLEASE INSERT THE ELEVATIONS IN THE |
| | SURROUNDING CONTEXT. |
| | 13. HOTEL DRAWINGS WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE RESUBMITTAL |
| | PACKAGE. HOTEL DRAWINGS SHALL BE INCORPORATED WITH THE |
| | RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, FACADES SHALL HAVE THE SAME LEVEL |
| | OF DETAIL, AND SHALL INCLUDE CALL OUT MATERIALS. |
| | 14. RESTAURANT FACADE IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH FLOOR |
| | PLANS: FACADE OF RESTAURANT SHOWS A SOLID WALL AT THE |
| | UPPER LEVEL TOWARDS THE PART BUT THE NOTE INDICATES |
| | STOREFRONT AS DEPICTED IN FLOOR PLANS. |
| | 15. RENDERINGS SHALL ACCURATELY DEPICT THE PROPOSED |
| | DESIGN INCLUDED IN FLOOR PLANS AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS. |
| | RENDERIGN IN SHEET A-20 DEPITS A PLANTER ALONG THE WEST |
| | ELEVATION THAT IS NOT INCLUDED IN DRAWINGS, AND TREES |
| | ARE DEPICTED IN RAISED PLANTING BEDS NOT IN TREE GRATES |
| | AS PROPOSED IN LA DRAWINGS. |
| | 16.LA DRAWINGS DO NOT REFLECT NEW RAMPS ALONG OLIVE |
| | AVENUE. |
| | 17. LA SHEET LP-1.02 DOES NOT MATCH THE HOTEL BUILDING |
| | PLACEMENT ALONG NARCISSUS AVE (NORTH SIDE OF HOTEL). |
| | BUILDING IS MUCH CLOSER TO CURB IN SHEET Z.1.0 THAN IN |
| | LP-1.02. PLEASE ADJUST WITH CORRECT LOCATION. |
| | 18. STAFF RECOMMENDS THE APPLICANT TO INCLUDE |
| | ADDITIONAL BIKE PARKING INSIDE THE GARAGE FOR HOTEL |
| | EMPLOYEES, AND INTALL SOME BIKE RACKS IN THE PUBLIC ROW |
| | FOR RETAIL USERS. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW: |
| | 1. ACKNOWLEDGED- PROJECT WILL BE REQUIRED TO PAY FOR |
| | ANY REMOVED ON-STREET PARKING SPACES. |
| | 2. NOT SATISFIED: STAFF UNDERSTANDS THE ABANDONMENT |
| | PROCESS WILL BE PROCESS SEPARATELY BUT SURVEY NEEDS TO |
| | INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF NARCISSUS AVENUE TO INCLUDE |
| | IT AS PART OF THE FAR CACLULATIONS- IS NARCISSUS AVENUE |
| | PROPOSED TO BE ABANDONED? SURVEY NEEDS TO INCLUDE THE |
| | TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE PROPOSED ABANDONED AREA. |
| | 3. SATISFIED- ELEVATORS AND STAIRS ARE COUNTED IN EVERY |
| | LEVEL. STAIRS WITHIN THE GARAGE USED BY THE RESIDENTIAL |
| | LEVEL SHALL BE COUNTED AS FAR. |
| | 4. SATISFIED - LOADING DOCK AND SERVICE AREA ON 2ND |
| | STREET IS IMPACTING THE HISTORIC STRUCTURE ACROSS THE |
| | STREET. STAFF SUGGESTS A MEETING WITH THE CITY?S |
| | HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER TO DISCUSS ALTERNATIVE |
| | DESIGNS TO MITIGATE THE NEGATIVE IMPACT. |
| | 5. APPLICANT TO SUBMIT REQUEST FOR VARIANCE- PROJECT |
| | DOES NOT COMPLY WITH MINIMUM ACTIVE USES ALONG 2ND |
| | STREET. |
| | 6. APPLICANT TO SUBMIT REQUEST FOR VARIANCE- PROJECT |
| | DOES NOT COMPLY WITH MINIMUM ACTIVE USES ABOVE 1ST |
| | FLOOR ON BANYAN BLVD. |
| | 7. SATISFIED- BIKE STORAGE FOR RESIDENTIAL USE IS |
| | RECOMMENDED TO BE LOCATED ON 1ST FLOOR DUE TO SAFETY |
| | CONCERNS. |
| | 8. NOT SATISFIED- TRAFFIC STUDY NEEDED. INCLUDE |
| | ADJACENT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. |
| | 9. NOT SATISFIED: PLEASE PROVIDE PROTOMETRICS AND |
| | LIGHTING DETAILS -LIGHT FIXTURES ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE |
| | SHALL MATCH EXISTING LIGHTS ALONG THE WATERFRONT PARK. |
| | LIGHT FIXTURES ON OTHER STREET SHALL MEET DOWNTOWN CITY |
| | STANDARD. |
| | 10 NOT SATISFIED: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NEEDED. SPOT |
| | ELEVATIONS INDICATED ON SHEET LP-0.01 DO NOT MATCH |
| | CIVIL DRAWINGS. PLEASE PROVIDE CROSS SECTION TO EXPLAIN |
| | THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEN THE PARK AND THE SURROUNDING |
| | SIDEWALKS AND STREETS- PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAIL |
| | ON THE DESIGN OF THE OPEN SPACE AT THE HELEN WILKES |
| | SITE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH FLAGLER DRIVE. |
| | FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA |
| | APONTE AT 561-822-1439. |
| | |
| |
Print |
