| Date |
Text |
| 2017-03-08 08:59:02 | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 03.08.2017 |
| | PROJECT NO.: Z17020016 |
| | CASE NO.: PB 813J |
| | ADDRESS: 1 HARVARD CIRCLE |
| | APPLICANT/CONTACT: RYAN JOHNSTON |
| | TELEPHONE NO.: 561.691.4552 |
| | SCOPE OF REVIEW: ADDITION OF STORAGE BUILDING AND SITE |
| | IMPROVEMENTS. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ALL |
| | UTILITY COMPANIES INDICATING THAT THEY HAVE NO |
| | OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. |
| | |
| | 2. HAS THERE BEEN ANY DISCUSSION AS TO WHETHER TRAFFIC |
| | CONCURRENCY IS REQUIRED FOR THE ADDITIONAL SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGE? |
| | |
| | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STATUS OF REVIEW BY THE VILLAGE |
| | COMMERCE CENTER ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD. |
| | |
| | 4. IMPROVEMENTS ARE SHOWN IN THE EXISTING UTILITY |
| | EASEMENT?EASEMENT CONSENT SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ALL |
| | UTILITY COMPANIES. |
| | |
| | 5. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO HAVE MORE DISCUSSION REGARDING |
| | THE PROPOSED GUARDRAIL. IF THE BARRIER IS TO BE |
| | VISIBLE, A MORE AESTHETIC ALTERNATIVE WOULD BE |
| | ENCOURAGED. IF THE BARRIER IS GOING TO BE HIDDEN |
| | COMPLETELY AMONGST THE LANDSCAPING, THEN WHAT IS |
| | PROPOSED MAY BE ACCEPTABLE. REGARDLESS, ADDITIONAL |
| | INFORMATION NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED REGARDING HOW THE |
| | GUARDRAIL IS TO BE INSTALLED AS IT COULD HAVE IMPACT ON |
| | EXISTING MATURE TREES, ETC. |
| | |
| | 6. PLEASE DIMENSION THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE FRONT OF |
| | THE PARKING STALL AND THE PROPOSED GUARDRAIL. THERE |
| | NEEDS TO BE A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) FEET OF CLEAR OVERHANG |
| | FOR THE PARKING. |
| | |
| | 7. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED GATES. |
| | |
| | 8. PLEASE CLARIFY THE PROPOSED TRAFFIC PATTERN WITHIN |
| | THE SITE, SPECIFICALLY RELATING TO THE GATE OPERATIONS, |
| | DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW (ENTRANCES AND EXISTS). IS |
| | THE ACCESS POINT ON COLUMBIA DRIVE AN ENTRANCE ONLY? IF |
| | NOT, THE EXIT GATE IS SWINGING IN THE WRONG DIRECTION. |
| | IF THE ACCESS POINTS ARE GOING TO BE DESIGNATED AS |
| | SEPARATE ENTRANCE AND EXIT, THEN SIGNAGE MAY BE |
| | REQUIRED WITHIN THE PARKING LOT TO DIRECT TRAFFIC FLOW. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) 6 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X |
| | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | P: 561.822.1448 |
| | F: 561.822.1460 |
| | |
| | E: [email protected] |
| | |
| | W: WPB.ORG |
| | |
| |
Print |
