| Date |
Text |
| 2017-05-23 15:32:16 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS ARE CONSISTENT WITH |
| | ANY CHANGES MADE TO THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 2.) A RE-PLAT OF THE PROPERTY WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO |
| | THE ISSUANCE OF THE C.O. FOR THE EXPANSION. |
| | |
| | 3.) CROSSWALK STRIPING ON BISCAYNE DRIVE WILL REQUIRE A |
| | PERMIT FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) IS THERE AN ALTERNATIVE LOCATION FOR THE DUMPSTER |
| | ENCLOSURE SHOULD IT BE REMOVED FROM THE 20 FT. UTILITY |
| | EASEMENT? |
| | |
| | 2.) DUMPSTER DETAIL IS MISSING FROM THE REGULATING PLAN |
| | (SHEET SP-2). |
| | |
| | 3.) BICYCLE RACK DETAIL DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE PLAN. |
| | THE APPLICANT MAY ALSO WANT TO ORIENTATE THE RACK SO |
| | THAT IT IS PARALLEL WITH THE STREET FOR EASE OF USE. |
| | |
| | 4.) BICYCLE RACK DETAIL IN THE REGULATING PLAN (SHEET |
| | SP-2) DOES NOT HAVE ALL THE DIMENSIONS TO DEMONSTRATE |
| | THAT THE PAD AND RACK IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S |
| | BICYCLE DESIGN STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | 5.) THE REGULATING PLAN (SHEET SP-2) SHOWS A DETAIL FOR |
| | A 6 FT. HIGH DECORATIVE FENCE; HOWEVER, THIS FENCE |
| | CANNOT BE LOCATED IN THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE SHOW WHERE |
| | THE FENCE IS LOCATED OR REMOVE THE DETAIL FROM THE |
| | REGULATING PLAN. |
| | |
| | 6.) THE PROPOSED FAR IN THE SITE DATA TABULAR IS |
| | INCONSISTENT WITH THE PROPOSED FAR IN THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS TABLE. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY (THE |
| | CORRECT PROPOSED FAR IS 0.61) |
| | |
| | 7.) BASED ON STAFF'S CALCULATION, THE PROPOSED BUILDING |
| | COVERAGE IS 46 PERCENT (WITHOUT THE 1,600 SQ. FT. |
| | CANOPY). PLEASE CORRECT IN THE SITE DATA AND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TABLES FOR CONSISTENCY. ALSO, |
| | PLEASE SHOW WHERE THE 1,600 SQ. FT. CANOPY IS LOCATED |
| | IN THE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 8.) PHOTOMETRIC PLAN STILL DOES NOT SHOW LIGHT |
| | SPILLOVER BEYOND THE PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 9.) CLARIFY AND CORRECT IN THE REGULATING PLAN IF THE |
| | DETAIL FOR THE LIGHT POLE LOCATION DETAIL (EAST PARKING |
| | LOT) IS FOR THE TWO SOUTH END PARKING LOTS. |
| | |
| | 10.) WILL THE EXISTING GREASE TRAPS, LOCATED IN THE |
| | STUDENT DROP OFF/PICK UP AREA BE REMOVED? PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND/OR NOTATE IF THE |
| | INTENT IS TO LEAVE THE GREASE TRAPS. |
| | |
| | 11.) NORTH ARROW IS MISSING FROM THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN. |
| | |
| | 12.) REVISE THE HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING TO THE |
| | TOP OF THE PARAPET WALL (LOCATED ON THE ROOFTOP OF THE |
| | BUILDING). PLEASE ENSURE THE CHANGE TO THE HEIGHT IS |
| | REFLECTED IN ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX |
| | (6) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 INCHES X |
| | 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND |
| | AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT |
| | CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE |
| | ($200.00). |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE |
| | QUESTIONS. |
| |
Print |
