Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z16090046
Project Number Z16090046
Review Stop Z
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2016-12-09 11:37:56PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 12.09.2016
 PROJECT NO.: Z16090046
 CASE NO.: PB 1617A
 ADDRESS: BROWARD AVENUE & PICADILLY STREET
 APPLICANT/CONTACT: DAMIAN BRINK
 TELEPHONE NO.: 561.684.6141
 SCOPE OF REVIEW: MODIFICATIONS TO PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED
 MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT.
 ___________________________________________
  
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO
 PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS.
  
 2. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS APPEAR TO REMAIN OUTSTANDING.
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
  A. LANDSCAPE ISLAND ON NORTH SIDE OF HANDICAP SPACES
 SHALL BE PROVIDED...ISLAND IS THERE BUT NO LANDSCAPING
 IS SHOWN.
  
  B. JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT SAYS PARKING WAS CONVERTED
 TO ONE?WAY?BUT PLANS STILL SHOW TWO?WAY. WHY WOULD
 ONE?WAY BE PROPOSED? THE LAYOUT ACCOMMODATES TWO?WAY
 TRAFFIC FLOW. PLEASE EXPLAIN.
  
  C. NEW TRASH PICK?UP LOCATION NEEDS TO BE APPROVED BY
 THE CITY?S PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.
  
  D. JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES THAT THE TRASH
 ROOM WAS ADDED TO THE SOUTH OF THE LEASING CENTER, BUT
 THE PLANS SHOW THE TRASH ROOM OFF OF THE ALLEY, SOUTH
 OF A RESIDENTIAL UNIT. PLEASE CLARIFY.
  
  E. PLANS SHOW THAT THE SETBACK OF THE UPPER FLOOR ON
 PICADILLY STREET WENT FROM 7 FEET TO 4 FEET?PLEASE
 EXPLAIN. IS THIS TO THE EDGE OF THE BALCONY, NOT THE
 FA?ADE? PLANS MAY NEED TO CLARIFY.
  
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 NEW COMMENTS:
  
  A. PLANS APPEAR TO SHOW THE PAVED ALLEY BEING ONLY 10
 FEET WIDE (OR LESS) AT THE NORTHERN END; PLEASE PROVIDE
 CONFIRMATION FROM THE CITY'S ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
 THAT THIS IS SUFFICIENT WIDTH.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 6 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 F: 561.822.1460
  
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved