| Date |
Text |
| 2016-10-12 10:27:13 | PLANNING BOARD CASE NO. 1600G |
| | PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SITE PLAN AMENDMENT |
| | 1902 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE |
| | (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN.PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY DECEMBER 12, |
| | 2016), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY |
| | FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($60). |
| | |
| | 1) RESOLUTION NO. 144-11 APPROVED THE ATHLETIC/FINE |
| | ARTS COMPLEX AT 14,816 SQUARE FEET. THE SITE PLAN |
| | SUBMITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION SHOWS THE ATHLETIC/FINE |
| | ARTS COMPLEX AS HAVING 15,654 SQUARE FEET. THE NEW |
| | BUILDING SIZE INCREASES THE SIZE OF THE BUILDING BY |
| | MORE THAN FIVE (5) PERCENT, WHICH MAY NOT BE DONE AS A |
| | MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT, BUT RATHER |
| | REQUIRES A MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT. |
| | |
| | 2) A SURVEY SHOWING THE EXISTING CONDITIONS WAS NOT |
| | PROVIDED WITH THIS APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 3) THE SITE PLAN DATA TABLES SHALL USE AS A BASE THE |
| | INFORMATION APPROVED AS PART OF THE LATEST MINOR |
| | AMENDMENT DATED JUNE 28, 2016. THIS HAS BEEN A REPEATED |
| | COMMENT WITH THIS PROJECT THAT INCORRECT OR OBSOLETE |
| | BASE INFORMATION AND PLANS ARE USED ON NEW SUBMITTALS. |
| | |
| | 4) ELIMINATE THE PHASE LINES FROM THE PLANS. THE BASE |
| | PLAN SHALL SHOW WHAT IS CURRENTLY CONSTRUCTED AND WHAT |
| | IS PROPOSED AS PART OF THIS AMENDMENT. THERE ARE TWO |
| | OPTIONS FOR THE ATHLETIC/FINE ARTS COMPLEX: |
| | |
| | A. THE OUTLINE OF THE ATHLETIC/FINE ARTS COMPLEX SHALL |
| | BE REMOVED FROM THE PLAN. THE OUTLINE DOES NOT CONFORM |
| | TO THE AREA WHERE IT IS SHOWN AS IT OVERLAPS WITH THE |
| | NEWLY CONSTRUCTED SIDEWALK AND THE SITE WALL PARALLEL |
| | TO FLAGLER DRIVE. THIS AREA MAY HAVE A NOTE ADDED WHICH |
| | STATES "FUTURE 14,816 SQUARE FOOT ATHLETIC/FINE ARTS |
| | COMPLEX APPROVED BY RESOLUTION NO. 144-11". UNDER THIS |
| | OPTION, THE FINAL LAYOUT OF THE REVISED ATHLETIC/FINE |
| | ARTS COMPLEX SHALL BE REVIEWED BY THE CITY AS PART OF A |
| | FUTURE AMENDMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | B. SHOW FULL DETAILS OF THE ATHLETIC/FINE ARTS COMPLEX |
| | AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO THE SITE. THIS INCLUDES |
| | FOUNDATION PLANTING, THE MODIFICATION TO THE SIDEWALK |
| | AND HOW THE BUILDING WILL BE CONSTRUCTED ADJACENT TO |
| | THE NEW SITE WALL PARALLEL TO FLAGLER DRIVE. |
| | |
| | 5) PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE SECURITY KIOSK. |
| | |
| | 6) THE CIVIL PLANS SHOW THE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY ON THE |
| | NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. THE PLANS SHALL SHOW ACCURATE |
| | CONDITIONS. ADDITIONALLY, THE CIVIL PLAN SHALL SHOW |
| | CURRENT CONDITIONS, NOT "TO BE DEMOLISHED" FOR |
| | BUILDINGS AND INFRASTRUCTURE THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN |
| | REMOVED. |
| | |
| | 7) THE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY IS NOT SHOWN AS IT IS BUILT |
| | WHERE IT TURNS AND HEADS SOUTH AT THE TERMINUS OF |
| | ORANGE COURT. THE FIELD CONDITION IS THAT THE WALKWAY |
| | EXTENDS TO THE PARKING LOT. UNLESS THE PLAN IS TO |
| | REMOVE THE COMPLETED WORK, THEN ALL PLANS SHALL SHOW |
| | ACCURATE CONDITIONS. |
| | |
| | 8) THE LOW FREESTANDING SIGN CONTINUES TO BE SHOWN IN |
| | THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT. THE CITY'S ENGINEERING SERVICES |
| | DIVISION SHALL GRANT SPECIFIC APPROVAL FOR THE SIGN |
| | WITHIN THE EASEMENT THAT IT DOES NOT INTERRUPT THE |
| | FUNCTION OF THE EASEMENT. ADDITIONALLY, THE SITE PLAN |
| | SHALL CLEARLY SHOW THE SIGN SETBACK FROM THE FLAGLER |
| | DRIVE PROPERTY LINE AND THAT THE SIGN IS LOCATED |
| | OUTSIDE OF THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE. |
| | |
| | 9) PLEASE VERIFY THAT THE WALL AND FENCE DRAWINGS ARE |
| | THE SAME AS THE ONES APPROVED AT BUILDING PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 10) THE GATE LOCATION/SWING SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE |
| | ADJUSTED TO PERMIT PEDESTRIANS FROM AUSTIN LANE TO |
| | DIRECTLY ACCESS THE PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN PATH WHEN THE |
| | GATE BLOCKS VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE COCOANUT LANE. |
| | ALTERNATIVELY, THE PEDESTRIAN PATH SHALL BE EXTENDED TO |
| | AUSTIN LANE TO CONNECT BEHIND THE GATE POST WHEN IT |
| | CLOSES COCOANUT LANE. PLEASE NOTE: STAFF PERFORMED A |
| | SITE VISIT AND THE POSTS FOR THIS FENCE HAVE BEEN |
| | INSTALLED IN AN INCORRECT LOCATION TOO FAR TO THE WEST |
| | OF WHERE THEY ARE PERMITTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 376-10. |
| | |
| | 11) THE NEW LIGHT POLES FOR THE ATHLETIC FIELD SHALL |
| | CONFORM TO THE SIDE SETBACKS ESTABLISHED FOR THE |
| | EXISTING PARKING LOT LIGHTS ALONG ORANGE COURT. THE |
| | SURVEY SHALL SHOW THE EXISTING LIGHT POLE LOCATIONS AND |
| | THEIR SETBACK FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. ONE OF THE |
| | PROPOSED LIGHT POLES IS SHOWN IN THE ORANGE COURT |
| | RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ONE IS SHOWN IN THE COCOANUT LANE |
| | RIGHT-OF-WAY. THESE LOCATIONS ARE NOT PERMITTED. PLEASE |
| | NOTE: STAFF PERFORMED A SITE VISIT AND NOTED THAT THE |
| | LIGHT POLE BASES HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. THESE LOCATIONS |
| | HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED BY ZONING AS PART OF AN |
| | AMENDMENT OR AS PART OF A PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 12) PROVIDE THE PHOTOMETRIC DETAILS THAT THE NEW |
| | ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTING LEVELS DO NOT EXCEED 0.5 |
| | FOOTCANDLES AT THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT |
| | BOUNDARIES TO THE SOUTH OF THE FIELD. |
| | |
| | 13) PROVIDE DETAILS TO VERIFY THAT THE NEW LIGHT POLES |
| | AND FIXTURES ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE FIELD MATCH THE |
| | PARKING LOT LIGHT POLES AND FIXTURES IN HEIGHT AND |
| | STYLE. LIGHT CUT OFF SHIELD SHALL BE PROVIDED AS |
| | NEEDED. |
| | |
| | 14) STAFF CONTINUES TO QUESTION WHY THE NEW "HORIZONTAL |
| | SUN CONTROLS" CANNOT BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE SAME STYLE |
| | AS THE METAL AWNINGS WHICH COVER THE WINDOWS ON THE |
| | EXISTING CLASSROOM BUILDING TO HAVE A CONSISTENT LOOK. |
| | |
| | 15) THE BICYCLE RACK AND PAD DETAIL SHALL MATCH THE |
| | NUMBER SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. THE DIMENSIONS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED ON THE SITE PLAN. THE SITE DATA TABLE SHALL BE |
| | UPDATED TO REFLECT THAT THERE ARE 14 BICYCLE SPACES |
| | PROVIDED AS EACH RACK HOLDS TWO BICYCLES. |
| | |
| | 16) PROVIDE THE SETBACK OF THE PLAY EQUIPMENT AND THE |
| | HEIGHT OF THE BOAT STRUCTURE ON THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 17) PROVIDE THE SETBACK AND HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED |
| | ARBOR. |
| | |
| | 18) SIGN COMPLIANCE WILL BE DETERMINED AT THE TIME OF |
| | THE SUBMITTAL FOR THE SIGN PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 19) THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS TREES REMAINING BETWEEN |
| | THE PITT BUILDING NORTH WOOD FENCE AND THE PUBLIC |
| | PEDESTRIAN PATH. PLEASE VERIFY THESE DIMENSIONS. STAFF |
| | VISITED THE SITE AND THERE VISUALLY DOES NOT LOOK LIKE |
| | THERE IS SUFFICIENT ROOM BETWEEN THE FENCE AND THE |
| | PEDESTRIAN PATH (ONCE INSTALLED TO ITS FULL WIDTH WHEN |
| | THE POWER POLE IS REMOVED) TO EVEN HAVE THE HEDGE THAT |
| | IS SHOWN. E-MAILS FROM THE CONTRACTOR SEEM TO INDICATE |
| | THAT HE AGREES THAT THERE IS INSUFFICIENT ROOM FOR THE |
| | LANDSCAPE. WAS THE WOOD FENCE REPLACED TOO FAR TO THE |
| | NORTH? |
| | |
| |
Print |
