| Date |
Text |
| 2016-11-10 13:58:45 | CASE NUMBER: PB 1719 |
| | PROJECT NAME: 45TH STREET HOTEL |
| | |
| | ZONING CONTACT: HEATHER M. TRIBOU |
| | (561) 822-1562 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | GENERAL COMMENTS |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF NINE |
| | (9) AND AN ELECTRONIC COPIES IN PDF FORMAT OF ALL |
| | PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED |
| | PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS |
| | THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, |
| | OCTOBER 28, 2016, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE DECEMBER 20, |
| | 2016 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS/THE PPRC MEETING (BY |
| | MONDAY DECEMBER 12, 2016), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED |
| | WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW |
| | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WERE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. THE RESUBMITTAL FEE |
| | IS 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. $769.00 |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | SPECIFIC COMMENTS |
| | |
| | --THE LIGHTING PLAN SHALL MEET REQUIREMENT OF |
| | 94-207(D)(8) AS NOT TO EXCEED ONE FOOT CANDLE AT OR |
| | BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF DEVELOPMENT. SUBMITTED PLANS |
| | EXCEED THIS REQUIREMENT ON BOTH THE NORTH AND WEST SIDE |
| | OF PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | --THE LIGHTING PLAN AND SITE PLAN SHALL BE COORDINATED |
| | TO MEET BOTH LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS AND MINIMUM PARKING |
| | STALL DIMENSIONS. THE SIX LIGHT POLES PLACES IN PARKING |
| | SPOTS REDUCE THE ALREADY MINIMUM SIZED PARKING SPACES. |
| | PLUS, IT WOULD BE ADVISABLE TO HAVE CURB PROTECTING THE |
| | POLES. |
| | |
| | --THE LIGHTING PLAN LUMENS STATED ON THE LIGHTING PLAN |
| | USED FOR CALCULATIONS ARE LESS THAN THOSE FOUND IN THE |
| | MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATIONS FOR R4, R3 AND R5. IF THE |
| | MANUFACTURE SPECIFICATIONS LUMENS ARE USED THEN FOOT |
| | CANDLES EXCEEDED WILL INCREASE. |
| | |
| | --THE LIGHTING PLAN AND THE ARCHITECTURE PLANS SHALL BE |
| | COORDINATED SO THAT LIGHTS ARE NOT PLACED WHERE THE |
| | OVERHANG OF THE PORTE COHERE ARE LOCATED. PEDESTRIAN |
| | SCALE LIGHTING IS RECOMMENDED. |
| | |
| | --THE LIGHTING PLAN PROVIDES NO COVERAGE FOR THE |
| | PEDESTRIAN PATH LEADING TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| | PEDESTRIAN SCALE BOLLARDS ARE RECOMMENDED. |
| | |
| | --THE SITE PLAN (SP-1): PLAN -IT APPEARS AS THE |
| | DRAINAGE EASEMENT FROM THE SURVEY HAS BEEN MODIFIED FOR |
| | ENTRY DRIVE. PLEASE CONFIRM. |
| | |
| | --THE SITE PLAN (SP-1): PLAN ?CONNECT NORTH DRIVE AISLE |
| | TO CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT. LAW IS REVIEWING |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | --THE SITE PLAN (SP-1): SIGN ?B? DETAIL-THE 30? POLE |
| | SIGN IS NOT PERMITTED IN THE INDUSTRIAL ZONING |
| | DISTRICT. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT WAIVER. |
| | |
| | --THE SITE PLAN (SP-1): PLAN PAVING, DRAINAGE AND |
| | WASTEWATER PLAN ?COORDINATE THE BIKE RACK LOCATION WITH |
| | THE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | --THE SITE PLAN (SP-1)- DIMENSION OVERALL SIZE OF |
| | BICYCLE RACK. |
| | |
| | --THE CIVIL PLAN- CORRECT BICYCLE RACK LOCATION |
| | |
| | --LANDSCAPE PLAN (LP-2): COORDINATE SIGN A WITH |
| | LANDSCAPE. |
| | |
| | --ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND/ OR SITE PLAN- BUILDING |
| | SIGNAGE-DIMENSION ALL SIGNAGE AND SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | SECTION 94-408 (A)(1) OF THE ZONING CODE, IF NOT ASK |
| | FOR WAIVER. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
