| Date |
Text |
| 2017-01-10 09:59:37 | PB 1559J ? 2ND PPRC REVIEW |
| | 1515 SOUTH FLAGLER CONDO (A.K.A. THE MODERN PD) |
| | 1515 SOUTH FLAGLER |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN |
| | (11) [IF MAJOR AMENDMENT] OR FIVE (5) [IF REMAINS MINOR |
| | AMENDMENT] PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF |
| | FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - IF THE PLAN ELEMENTS REQUIRING A MAJOR AMENDMENT |
| | REMAIN THEN THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY |
| | ADDRESSED AND SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 |
| | PM ON FRIDAY, JANUARY 27, 2017, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE |
| | SCHEDULED FOR THE MARCH 21, 2017 PLANNING BOARD |
| | MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY MARCH 11, 2017), |
| | THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER |
| | ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($60 FOR |
| | MINOR AMENDMENT). |
| | |
| | - IF THE CASE IS A MAJOR AMENDMENT THEN PUBLIC HEARING |
| | NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING |
| | AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND AN ADDITIONAL |
| | $2,916 IN APPLICATION AND ADVERTISING FEES ARE |
| | REQUIRED. YOU WILL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAILERS. |
| | |
| | - IF THIS CONTINUES AS A MINOR AMENDMENT, IN ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH SECTION 94-35(D)(6)A, SINCE THIS IS A NEW SITE |
| | PLAN WITHIN A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, YOU NEED TO GET |
| | APPROVAL OF A LEVEL II SITE PLAN CONCURRENT WITH THE |
| | MINOR AMENDMENT. WHILE NO ADDITIONAL APPLICATION |
| | DOCUMENTS OR PLANS ARE REQUIRED AS THEY WOULD BE A |
| | DUPLICATION OF THE MATERIAL SUBMITTED WITH THE MINOR |
| | AMENDMENT APPLICATION, YOU ARE REQUIRED TO PAY THE |
| | APPLICATION FEE OF $1,500. |
| | |
| | 1) SHEET A125 SHOWS THE NORTH DIMENSION TO THE FACE OF |
| | THE BALCONIES AT 30 FEET 10 INCHES, WHILE SHEET A127 |
| | SHOWS THIS DIMENSION AS 30 FEET 9 3/4 INCHES. WHILE |
| | BOTH MEET THE BALCONY INTRUSION WAIVER, PLEASE ENSURE |
| | THAT ALL DRAWINGS SHOW THE SAME DIMENTIONS. |
| | |
| | 2) THE REAR PEDESTAL SETBACK FOR THE APPROVED MODERN |
| | RPD IS 24 FEET 4 INCHES. WHILE THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS |
| | AND THE SITE PLAN SHOW THIS DIMENSION LINE, IT APPEARS |
| | THAT IT IS MARKING THE INSIDE FACE OF THE WALL NOT THE |
| | EXTERIOR FACE OF THE WALL. PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT |
| | THE DRAWINGS TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED |
| | PEDESTAL SETBACK. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE PROVIDE THE REAR |
| | SETBACK DIMENSION FOR THE PORTION OF THE PEDESTAL NORTH |
| | OF THE PORTION OF THE LOT WHICH EXTENDS TO SOUTH OLIVE |
| | AVENUE (ADJACENT TO SMITH AND MOORE ARCHITECTS) SO THAT |
| | STAFF CAN VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED SETBACK |
| | WAIVER. |
| | |
| | 3) PROVIDE THE BUILDING SETBACKS FOR THE PEDESTAL ON AT |
| | LEAST ONE OF THE CIVIL PLAN SHEETS. |
| | |
| | 4) PLEASE CLARIFY, THE FPL VAULT, THE MAIN ELECTRIC, |
| | THE SWITCH GEAR AND EMERGENCY GENERATOR ROOMS HAVE THE |
| | FLOOR A BIT BELOW GRADE WITH THE ROOF ELEVATION AT 24 |
| | FEET 4 INCH NGVD? HOW WILL THIS ROOF BE TREATED? |
| | |
| | 5) THE APPROVED MODERN RPD INCLUDED A PUBLICLY |
| | ACCESSIBLE PASSIVE PARK WITH AN AREA OF 11,455 ALONG |
| | FLAGLER DRIVE. THE 12,442 SQUARE FOOT AREA SHOWN ON |
| | SHEET L000.5 INCLUDES THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK, WHICH MAY |
| | NOT BE INCLUDED IN THE PASSIVE PARK AREA. THIS DIAGRAM |
| | NEEDS TO BE REVISED TO CORRECTLY SHOW THE REQUIRED |
| | AMOUNT OF PASSIVE PARK WHOLLY ON-SITE. THE PROVIDED |
| | PLANS SHOW A LESSER AREA GIVEN UP AS THE PASSIVE PARK. |
| | |
| | 6) PLEASE PROVIDE AN UPDATE ON CONDITION 2.M. OF |
| | SECTION 4 OF ORDINANCE NO. 4245-09, WHICH REQUIRES |
| | MEETING WITH THE ADJACENT NEIGHBORS ON THE DESIGN OF |
| | THE PASSIVE PARK. ZONING STAFF DOES NOT HAVE ANY ISSUES |
| | WITH THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF THE PLAZA. DETAILS, SUCH |
| | AS THE HEIGHT OF THE WALL, SEAT WALL AND BENCHES WAS |
| | NOT BEEN PROVIDED. ENSURE THERE IS ADEQUATE LIGHTING |
| | FOR THE EVENING HOURS WHEN THE PARK MAY BE IN USE AND |
| | TO DISCOURAGE USE OF THE PARK FOR OVERNIGHT |
| | ACCOMMODATIONS. THE WALLS AND THE BENCH WALLS SHOULD BE |
| | DESIGNED WITH ANTI-SKATE BOARD GRINDING FEATURES ? |
| | AFTERMARKET ADD-ONS RARELY LOOK AS GOOD AS IF THE |
| | FEATURES WERE DESIGNED IN THE ORIGINAL PLAN. THE |
| | BENCHES ARE ALL UNIQUE SHAPES WHICH WOULD REQUIRE |
| | CUSTOM WORK. IT MAY BE MORE PRACTICAL HAVE A UNIFORM |
| | DESIGN SHOWN ON THE PLANS AT THIS STAGE, RATHER THAN AT |
| | THE PERMITTING PHASE, THOUGH THIS IS UP TO YOU. |
| | WHICHEVER BENCH ROUTE IS CHOSEN, PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE |
| | BENCHES ARE DESIGNED IN SUCH A WAY TO MAKE SLEEPING ON |
| | THEM UNCOMFORTABLE. |
| | |
| | 7) THE PARKING TABLE PROVIDED WITH THE PLAN DOES NOT |
| | INCLUDE THE PARKING TABLE SHALL INCLUDE THE NUMBER OF |
| | REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, ADA PARKING |
| | SPACES, GUEST SPACES AND BICYCLE SPACES. EXAMPLE: |
| | |
| | 84 UNITS WITH 2+ BEDROOMS X 2 SPACES PER UNIT = 168 |
| | PARKING SPACES |
| | GUEST PARKING IS 1 SPACE PER 10 UNITS = 9 PARKING |
| | SPACES |
| | STAFF PARKING PER THE APPROVED MODERN = 6 SPACES |
| | TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING REQUIRED = 183 SPACES |
| | TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED = *** SPACES |
| | |
| | THE PROVIDED SPACES ON THE TABLE SHALL BE BROKEN DOWN |
| | BY NUMBER OF EACH TYPE OF SPACE (REGULAR, ADA, |
| | COMPACT). PLEASE SEE THE MODERN APPROVAL FOR AN |
| | EXAMPLE. |
| | |
| | 8) PLEASE NOTE THAT THE 11 ON-STREET PARKING SPACES |
| | WERE APPROVED BY THE MODERN ORDINANCE AS PUBLIC PARKING |
| | SPACES (CONDITION 2.D. OF THE ORDINANCE) SEPARATE FROM |
| | THE PARKING SPACES THAT WERE PROVIDED TO MEET THE |
| | REQUIRED PARKING. AS SUCH, THE 11 ON-STREET PARKING |
| | SPACES MAY NOT BE COUNTED TOWARD MEETING THE REQUIRED |
| | 183 PARKING SPACES. STAFF COUNTS ONLY 173 PARKING |
| | SPACES ON-SITE, WHICH DOES NOT MATCH THE MINIMUM |
| | REQUIRED BY THE MODERN ORDINANCE. |
| | 9) THE PARKING DETAILS PROVIDED ON SHEET A114.1 DO NOT |
| | MEET CITY STANDARDS AND MUST BE REPLACED WITH THE |
| | STANDARD CITY DETAIL. ADDITIONALLY, THEY MUST INCLUDE A |
| | COMPACT SPACE DETAIL. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CORRECT CITY |
| | DETAIL WAS PROVIDED ON SHEET C-1 AS PART OF THE |
| | ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 10) PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR THE BICYCLE STORAGE |
| | ROOM AND DETAILS, MEETING CITY STANDARDS, FOR THE |
| | BICYCLE RACKS AND PARKING PAD. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE |
| | RACKS SHOWN ON THE PLANS DO NOT MEET CITY STANDARDS. |
| | THE PARKING TABLE SHALL INCLUDE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED |
| | AND PROVIDED SPACES. |
| | |
| | 11) HOW WILL RESIDENTS BRING THEIR BICYCLES TO THE |
| | STORAGE ROOM? RIDING THE BICYCLES THROUGH THE PARKING |
| | GARAGE IS NOT A SAFE ROUTE. IS THE INTENTION FOR ACCESS |
| | TO BE THROUGH THE HALLWAY WHICH LEADS OUT TO ARKONA |
| | COURT? HOW WILL ACCESS CONTROL BE PROVIDED? |
| | |
| | 12) IT IS ANTICIPATED THAT THE RESIDENTS OF THE |
| | BUILDING MAY HAVE GUESTS ARRIVE VIA BICYCLE, THERE |
| | SHALL BE AT LEAST ONE, PREFERABLY TWO BICYCLE RACKS |
| | (TWO OR FOUR BICYCLE PARKING SPACES) PROVIDED NEAR THE |
| | ENTRANCE TO THE BUILDING IN THE ARRIVAL COURT IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 94-485(Q). THIS BICYCLE PARKING |
| | MAY BE COUNTED TOWARD MEETING THE REQUIRED 10 SPACES, |
| | WITH THE BICYCLE STORAGE ROOM NUMBER REDUCED |
| | ACCORDINGLY (ALTHOUGH STAFF RECOMMENDS PROVIDING MORE |
| | THAN 10 TOTAL SPACES). |
| | |
| | 13) PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE NEW 22 FOOT ARKONA |
| | COURT RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE CIVIL PLANS. |
| | |
| | 14) NO PHOTOMETRIC PLANS WERE PROVIDED. PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY NOW THAT THERE WILL BE NO |
| | ISSUES AT TIME OF PERMITTING. |
| | |
| | 15) PROVIDE BETTER DETAILS ON WHAT THE EXTERIOR FACADE |
| | OF THE PEDESTAL WILL LOOK LIKE FROM THE EXTERIOR |
| | PROPERTIES AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THE ELEVATIONS ARE NOT |
| | CLEAR WHERE IT WILL BE A WALL WITH LANDSCAPE IN FRONT |
| | OR A SLOPE OF DIRT WITH SOD/LANDSCAPE COVERING THE |
| | WALL. STAFF EXPECTED MORE OF WHAT MATERIALS WOULD BE |
| | EXPOSED IF THERE WAS NO SLOPE. THE TOWER DOES LABEL |
| | MATERIALS. |
| | |
| | 14) THERE NEEDS TO BE A DATA TABLE WHICH STATES THE |
| | TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS IN THE BUILDING. THE TABLE NEEDS |
| | TO INCLUDE THAT THERE ARE THREE GUEST SUITES WITH A |
| | NOTE REPLICATING THE ORDINANCE PROHIBITION ON THEM |
| | CONTAINING KITCHEN FACILITIES (CONDITION 10 OF THE |
| | ORDINANCE). |
| | |
| | 15) IS A MONUMENT SIGN PROPOSED FOR THE BUILDING? IF |
| | SO, PLEASE SHOW ITS LOCATION ON THE PLANS SO STAFF CAN |
| | VERIFY THAT IT IS NOT IN CONFLICT WITH SITE LINES OR |
| | LANDSCAPE. |
| | |
| | 16) THE ZONING STAFF IDENTIFIES ITEMS 2 AND 6 AS ITEMS |
| | THAT FAIL TO CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE MODERN |
| | APPROVAL, ORDINANCE NO. 4195-09, AND WOULD NEED |
| | APPROVAL BY THE CITY COMMISSION AS REVISED WAIVERS AS |
| | PART OF A MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT. |
| | |
| |
Print |
