| Date |
Text |
| 2017-11-20 17:31:07 | COMMENTS BELOW ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE NOVEMBER 7, |
| | 2017 PACKAGE FROM E. SCHNEIDER INCLUDING ENGINEERING |
| | PLANS SIGNED AND SEALED ON 11/3/2017 AND COMMENT |
| | RESPONSE LETTER DATED NOVEMBER 3, 2017. |
| | |
| | 1. REVISE TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS A-A AND B-B ON SHEET |
| | PDD-3 TO ILLUSTRATE SAPODILLA AVE IS A CROWNED ROADWAY |
| | AND NOT A SHED SECTION. REVISE PAVEMENT DESIGN OF LANE |
| | ADDITION TO MATCH CITY STANDARD DETAIL GC-5. |
| | |
| | 2. ADD DRAINAGE STRUCTURES BEFORE (UPSTREAM OF) THE |
| | CROSS WALKS AT THE INTERSECTION OF IRIS AND SAPODILLA |
| | TO LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF STORMWATER RUNOFF FLOWING ACROSS |
| | THE CROSSWALKS (REPEAT COMMENT). THE RESPONSE DISCUSSED |
| | PLACEMENT OF A TRENCH DRAIN BEFORE THE CROSS WALKAT THE |
| | INTERSECTION OF SAPODILLA. THE COMMENT IS REFERRING TO |
| | THE CROSSWALKS ACROSS IRIS (SW CORNER TO NW CORNER) AND |
| | ACROSS SAPODILLA (SW CORNER TO EAST SIDE OF STREET) AT |
| | THE INTERSECTION OF IRIS ST. AND SAPODILLA AVE. |
| | |
| | 3. IDENTIFY WHERE THE ONSITE DRAINAGE CONTROL |
| | STRUCTURES WLL BE. ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS SHOULD BE |
| | LOCATED UPSTREAM OF THE CONTOL STRUCTURES (REPEAT |
| | COMMENT). STRUCTURES EX-MH4 ON SHEET PD-1 AND EX-CS ON |
| | SHEET PD-2 WERE THE ONLY STRUCTURES IDENTIFIED WITH |
| | WEIRS TO HOLD BACK AND CONTROL THE DISCHARGE OF |
| | STORMWATER FROM THE ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. PLEASE |
| | EXPLAIN THE PURPOSE OF THE WEIR IN STRUCTURE EX-MH4 IF |
| | IT CONTROLS THE FLOW FROM THE KRAVIS SITE. IT MAY NEED |
| | TO BE MOVED TO A STRUCTURE THAT IS WITHIN THE KRAVIS |
| | PROPERTY. EXPLAIN HOW THE EXFILTRATION SYSTEM BETWEEN |
| | STRUCTURES EX-S5S AND S-1 WILL BE SURCHARGED. |
| | |
| | 4. THE PROPOSED PIPE BETWEEN S-4 AND EX-CS NEEDS TO |
| | ENTER STRUCTURE EX-CS UPSTREAM OF THE WEIR. |
| | |
| | 5. SHEET DEM-1 NEEDS TO CALLOUT THE REMOVAL OF THE |
| | EXISTING CATCH BASIN INLET ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF |
| | SAPODILLA AND IRIS. |
| | |
| | 6. ON SHEET PD-2, THE PROPOSED GRADES FOR THE CROSSWALK |
| | ACROSS THE RAMP UP TO THE PUBLIC PARKING GARAGE |
| | INDICATE FLOW COMING DOWN THE RAMP WILL FLOW DOWN THE |
| | SIDEWALK LANDING AT THE WEST END OF THE CROSSWALK. IF |
| | THIS IS THE DESIGN INTENT, EROSION PROTECTION MAY BE |
| | NEEDED ALONG THE SIDE SLOPE. |
| | |
| | 7. IS A HANDRAIL PROPOSED FOR THE SIDEWALK ALONG THE |
| | WEST SIDE OF THE EXITING DRIVEWAY TO OKEECHOBEE BLVD |
| | FROM THE PUBLIC PARKING GARAGE. THE LONGITUDINAL SLOPE |
| | APPEARS STEEPER THAN 5%. |
| | |
| | 8. ON SHEET SMP-1, THE YIELD HERE TO PEDESTRIAN SIGN AT |
| | THE DRIVEWAY TO IRIS ST. FROM THE PROPOSED VALET |
| | PARKING GARAGE IS POSTED AFTER THE SIDEWALK. |
| | |
| | TRACY L WARD, P.E. |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-494-1120 |
| |
Print |
