Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z16070022
Project Number Z16070022
Review Stop Z
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2017-07-12 09:28:46PLANNING BOARD CASE NO. 1000E - 2ND PPRC REVIEW
 KRAVIS CENTER LEVEL III SITE PLAN - DREYFOOS HALL AND
 VALET GARAGE
 701 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
 JULY 28, 2017, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE
 SEPTEMBER 19, 2017 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY SEPTEMBER 12,
 2017), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY
 FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 1) PLANNING STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THIS APPLICATION IN
 ITS CURRENT DESIGN AS THE PRESENTED PLANS DO NOT COMPLY
 WITH THE ALL OF THE SITE DESIGN QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT
 STANDARDS.
  
 2) SAPODILLA AVENUE HAS BEEN DESIGNED AS A RESIDENTIAL
 STREET FRONTED BY ACTIVE USES WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF
 THE CITYPLACE RESIDENTIAL UNITS, THE METROPOLITAN AND
 THE EVERNIA PLACE DEVELOPMENTS. THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
 VALET GARAGE WITH NO ACTIVE USE LINED, THE CONSTRUCTION
 OF A SURFACE VALET PARKING LOT AND THE WIDENING OF
 SAPODILLA AVENUE TO ACCOMMODATE THE VALET ENTRANCE AND
 ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC THAT CURRENTLY DOES NOT EXIST ON
 SAPODILLA IS EXPECTED TO HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE
 SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
  
 3) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE FDOT PREDETERMINATION
 LETTER FOR THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE SAPODILLA AVENUE
 INTERSECTION MODIFICATION AND ADDITIONAL WESTBOUND
 RIGHT TURN LANE. CONDITIONS REQUIRED BY FDOT MAY RESULT
 IN MODIFIED OR NEW COMMENTS. PLEASE REVIEW THE COMMENTS
 PROVIDED BY THE CITY'S TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION
 REGARDING THE ON AND OFF SITE CIRCULATION BOTH FOR
 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AND SAPODILLA AVENUE AS THESE MAY
 AFFECT THE FDOT APPLICATION.
  
 4) PROVIDE A STUDY OR ANALYSIS DESIGNED BY A CERTIFIED
 PARKING EXPERT TO SHOW THE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE NEED
 OF 278 ADDITIONAL VALET PARKING SPACES.
 A. HOW MANY TOTAL VALET SPACES ARE THERE GOING TO BE
 AFTER THE NEW SPACES ARE ADDED WHEN COMBINED WITH THE
 SPACES WHICH ALREADY EXIST?
 B. HOW OFTEN IS A SHOW AT THE COHEN PAVILION AND AT THE
 DREYFOOS HALL WHICH REQUIRE UTILIZATION OF TWO VALET
 FIELDS?
 5) WHAT IS THE PLANNED CONSTRUCTION PHASING OF THE
 ITEMS COVERED BY THE LEVEL II AND LEVEL III
 APPLICATIONS?
  
 6) THE PORTION OF THE ENTRY DRIVE AND BUS DROP OFF THAT
 IS LOCATED SOUTH WEST OF THE DRYFOOS HALL, THE DRYFOOS
 HALL EXTENSION, THE ARTIST ENTRANCE PORTE CORCHERE AND
 THE NEW VALET PARKING STRUCTURE ARE CURRENTLY COMBINED
 AS PART OF THE LEVEL III SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION.
 WHILE THESE MAY BE PROCESSED AS A LEVEL III, IF THESE
 VARIOUS ELEMENTS ARE PLANNED TO BE PART OF PHASED
 CONSTRUCTION, IT MAY BE BETTER TO REMOVE SOME OF THE
 ITEMS AND PROCESS THEM AS A MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
 AMENDMENT SO THAT THE REVIEW PROCESS DOES NOT DELAY THE
 START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ENTRY DRIVE
 AND BUS DROP OFF RECONFIGURATION IS DIRECTLY TIED TO
 THE MODIFICATIONS THAT ARE PROPOSED SOUTH OF THE COHEN
 PAVILION AS PART OF THE LEVEL II REVIEW. UNDER THE
 CURRENT APPLICATION PROCESS, THE LEVEL II IMPROVEMENTS
 MAY NOT COMMENCE UNTIL THE LEVEL III SITE PLAN REVIEW
 IS APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION AFTER A PUBLIC
 HEARING.
  
 7) PLAZA AREA
  
 A. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT THE NEW BASEMENT AREA IS THAT IS
 SHOWN ON THE CROSS SECTIONS - SHEET AE121.
 B. THE CROSS SECTION DETAIL PAGE IS MISLABELED ON SHEET
 AE120 AS SHEET AE120 NOT AE121.
 C. THE LOWER PLAZA LEVEL FAILS TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED
 STREET TREES ADJACENT TO THE CURB AT 30 FOOT ON CENTER
 FOR ALL STREETS.
  
 8) LOBBY EXPANSION
  
 A. THE SITE PLAN AND THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHOW
 DIFFERING NUMBERS FOR THE LOBBY EXPANSION. ALL PLANS
 MUST SHOW THE SAME VALUES.
  
 9) DRYFOOS HALL ENTRY DRIVE AND BUS DROP OFF PORTE
 COCHERE - PLEASE REVIEW THE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
 COMMENTS FOR CITY CONCERNS REGARDING THE LAYOUT AND
 CIRCULATION CONFLICTS FOR THE ENTRY DRIVE AND BUS DROP
 OFF. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE SPECIFIC TO ITEMS NOTED
 BY THE PLANNING STAFF WHICH MUST BE ADDRESSED IF THEY
 REMAIN ON THE PLANS AFTER SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSING THE
 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING COMMENTS.
  
 A. REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE AUTOTURN DRAWINGS TO
 SHOW THAT FULL SIZED BUSSES AND EMERGENCY VEHICLES CAN
 ENTER AND EXIT THIS AREA. --- THE ONLY AUTOTURN DRAWING
 THAT WAS PROVIDED WAS FOR A 45 FOOT BUS. THE PROVIDED
 AUTOTURN EXHIBIT DOES NOT DEMONSTRATE THAT BUSSES CAN
 NEGOTIATE THE SITE. IT REQUIRES UNNATURAL DRIVING AND
 NOT A SMOOTH TRANSITION AROUND CURVES AS WELL AS
 CLIPPING THE BOX OFFICE PARKING SPACES SOUTH OF THE
 PORTE COCHERE.
 B. WILL THE BOX OFFICE PARKING BE SIGNED AS "BOX OFFICE
 ONLY" OR DOES THIS PARKING BECOME OPEN PARKING DURING
 PERFORMANCES?
 C. 60 DEGREE STANDARD PARKING SPACES (8.5 FEET WIDE)
 REQUIRE A STALL DEPTH OF 19 FEET 10 INCHES NOT THE 18
 FOOT DEPTH PROVIDED. YOU ARE PROPOSING 9 FOOT WIDE
 PARKING SPACES AND THE ADA PARKING SPACE IS 12 FEET
 WIDE. THESE WIDER SPACES REQUIRE AN EVEN DEEPER STALL
 DEPTH TO KEEP A PORTION OF THE CAR FROM EXTENDING INTO
 THE DRIVE AISLE. CORRECT THE DIMENSIONS AND PROVIDE
 PARKING DETAILS FOR THE 60 DEGREE BOX OFFICE PARKING
 SPACES AT THE WIDTHS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN.
 D. THERE ARE A NUMBER OF NEW CANOPIES BEING PROPOSED AS
 PART OF THIS APPLICATION. THERE ARE EXISTING CANOPIES
 THAT WILL REMAIN BETWEEN THE COHEN PAVILION AND THE
 DRYFOOS HALL. THE PLANS DO NOT SEEM TO MIRROR THE
 EXISTING CANOPIES IN ARCHITECTURAL STYLE, BOTH THE ROOF
 AND THE COLUMNS. PLEASE ADDRESS AND INDICATE ON THE
 PLANS THAT THE NEW CANOPIES WILL MATCH THE EXISTING
 CANOPIES AND THE CLADDING OF THE BUILDING.
 E. THE DRYFOOS HALL ENTRY DRIVE AND BUS DROP OFF PORTE
 COCHERE FAILS TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED STREET TREES
 ADJACENT TO THE CURB AT 30 FOOT ON CENTER ALONG
 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD.
  
 10) SECTION 94-113(D)(1) OF THE ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS REQUIRES THAT SIDEWALKS BE A
 MINIMUM OF EIGHT (8) FEET IN WIDTH. THE NEW SIDEWALKS
 ALONG OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD, IRIS STREET AND SAPODILLA
 AVENUE ARE REQUIRED TO MEET THIS STANDARD.
  
 11) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION FROM THE CONSTRUCTION
 SERVICES DIVISION THAT AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE IS ONLY
 REQUIRED FROM SAPODILLA AVENUE TO THE DRYFOOS HALL AND
 NOT FROM OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AS WELL.
  
 12) SAPODILLA AVENUE VALET DROP-OFF
  
 A. REPEAT COMMENT: THE DOWNTOWN REGULATIONS LIMIT THE
 WIDTH OF DRIVE AISLES FOR PORTE COCHERES TO 25 FEET IN
 WIDTH AT THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK (FIGURE IV-22) NOT 40
 FEET AS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. REDUCE THE OPENING
 WIDTH TO COMPLY WITH THE CITY REQUIREMENT.
 B. REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM
 THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DIVISION THAT THIS PARKING
 AREA DOES NOT REQUIRE AN ADA PARKING SPACE.
 C. THE REVISED PLANS SHOW AN EXIT TO THE SURFACE VALET
 LOT TO SAPODILLA AVENUE. NO EXIT IS PERMITTED. THE
 ALLOWANCE FOR A DROP OFF PORTE COCHERE FROM SAPODILLA
 AVENUE REQUIRES THAT THE NEXT DRIVEWAY BE LOCATED A
 MINIMUM OF 100 FEET FROM THE DROP OFF DRIVE (FIGURE
 IV-22).
  
 13) THE SAPODILLA VALET GARAGE
  
 A. THE SITE PLAN PROPOSES TO RECONFIGURE IRIS STREET
 DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE PROPOSED VALET GARAGE BY ADDING
 BULBOUTS TO FRAME SOME OF THE EXISTING PARALLEL PARKING
 SPACES. THE BULBOUTS REMOVE TWO METERED PARALLEL
 PARKING SPACES AND ONE PARALLEL ADA PARKING SPACE.
 PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM THE CITY'S PARKING
 DIVISION APPROVING THAT THE SPACES MAY BE REMOVED,
 INCLUDING WHAT THE COST FOR THE PERMANENT REMOVAL IS.
 IF THE PARKING DIVISION WILL PERMIT THE SPACES TO BE
 REMOVED, THEN YOU MUST PROVIDE A NOTORIZED AGREEMENT TO
 PAY ANY FEES ASSOCIATED WITH THE PERMANENT REMOVAL OF
 THE SPACES.
 B. THE CULTURAL ARTS DISTRICT REQUIRES BUILDINGS ON
 SECONDARY STREETS TO BE SETBACK 16 FEET FROM THE BACK
 OF THE CURB. THE PROPOSED BULBOUTS DO NOT SET THE CURB
 LINE. THE CURB LINE IS ESTABLISHED BY THE PREDOMINANT
 CURB ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF IRIS STREET. PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE SETBACK DIMENSION (MINIMUM 16 FEET) FROM
 THIS CURB LINE TO THE FACE OF THE PANELS MOUNTED TO THE
 PROPOSED GARAGE ON IRIS STREET. THE SAPODILLA AVENUE
 SETBACK
 C. THE CULTURAL ARTS DISTRICT REQUIRES BUILDINGS ON
 SECONDARY STREETS TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF 30 PERCENT OF
 THE BUILDING BE ACTIVE USE (REQ. 132.3 FEET). THE
 ACTIVE USE ALONG SAPODILLA AVENUE (PROVIDED 134 FEET)
 IS PREDICATED ON THE KRAVIS CENTER ABUTTING PUBLIC OPEN
 SPACE AS DEFINED IN SECTION 94-109 OF THE ZLDR. PROVIDE
 WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
 DIVISION THAT THE PROPOSED OPEN SPACE (PROPOSED
 DREYFOOS HALL PLAZA) COMPLIES WITH FEDERAL ADA
 REQUIREMENTS. IF IT MEETS THE ADA REQUIREMENTS, THEN
 THE SAPODILLA AVENUE FRONTAGE HAS MET THE ACTIVE USE
 REQUIREMENTS.
 D. PROVIDE ELEVATIONS WITH THE HEIGHT DIMENSIONS OF THE
 GARAGE. THE GARAGE ELEVATIONS SHALL BE CALCULATED FROM
 THE FINISHED GRADE AT THE EXTERIOR OR EACH FA?ADE.
 E. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS TO VERIFY THAT THE ROOFTOP
 CANOPY PROVIDES AT LEAST 30 PERCENT COVERAGE OF THE
 ROOFTOP DECK.
 F. PROVIDE THE OVERHANG DIMENSION OF THE ROOFTOP
 CANOPY. THIS MAY NOT EXCEED THE HORIZONTAL ENCROACHMENT
 ALLOWANCES.
 G. THE MAXIMUM PARKING RAMP SLOPE IS PERMITTED AT SIX
 PERCENT. SHEET AE301 SHOWS A 6.2 PERCENT SLOPE, WHICH
 IS NOT PERMITTED.
 H. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE ADDITIONAL CURB CUT FOR
 THE VALET INGRESS/EGRESS ON IRIS STREET. THIS
 ADDITIONAL ACCESS POINT FAILS TO ADHERE TO THE SITE
 DESIGN STANDARDS OF IMPROVING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY SINCE
 MORE CURB CUTS CREATE MORE POSSIBLE VEHICLE PEDESTRIAN
 CONFLICTS. THE KRAVIS CENTER NEEDS TO MANAGE THEIR
 SHOWS AND NOT USE IRIS STREET, A PUBLIC ROAD FOR THEIR
 VALET OPERATIONS. ADDITIONALLY, EVEN IN THE EVENT THAT
 THE USE OF IRIS STREET WAS PERMITTED FOR USE BY THE
 VALET TO EXIT THE GARAGE TO RETURN IT INBOUND FROM
 SAPODILLA AVENUE (AS STATED IN THE RESPONSE) THERE IS
 NO SCENARIO WHERE THE VALET SHOULD BE ACCESSING THE
 GARAGE FROM IRIS STREET, SO A 24 FOOT OPENING IS NOT
 SUPPORTABLE.
 I. THE PROPOSED GARAGE NEEDS TO MIRROR THE
 ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS OF THE KRAVIS CENTER, FOR EXAMPLE
 THE STONE CLADDING AT THE BASE OF THE BUILDING (THIS
 CURRENTLY EXISTS ON THE BUILDING PROPOSED FOR
 DEMOLITION).
 J. PROVIDE A TABLE ON THE ELEVATION PLANS TO VERIFY HOW
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF TABLE IV-4, FACADE ARTICULATION
 REQUIREMENTS, OF THE ZLDR ARE MET FOR THE PROPOSED
 GARAGE.
  
 14) ARTIST DROP-OFF
  
 A. PROVIDE THE SETBACK FROM THE CURB TO THE ARTIST
 DROP-OFF PORTE COCHERE. REMEMBER THAT IT IS REQUIRED TO
 MEET THE 16 FOOT SETBACK FOR THE BUILDING ENVELOPE.
  
 15) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE HOW THE PROPOSED NEW
 DEVELOPMENT WILL COMPLY WITH THE ENERGY CONSERVATION
 MEASURES REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE NO. 4412-12, EXHIBIT D.
 THERE IS A SPECIFIC LIST OF REQUIREMENTS INCLUDED IN
 THE ORDINANCE WHICH MUST BE ADDRESSED.
  
 16) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE LIGHTING AND PHOTOMETRIC
 PLANS FOR THE NEW DEVELOPMENT. ANY PROPOSED LIGHT POLES
 MAY NOT INTERFERE WITH THE PLACEMENT OF TREES.
  
 17) BICYCLE PARKING
  
 A. THE CITY DOES NOT PERMIT THE WAVE TYPE BICYCLE RACK.
 PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED
 CITY MODELS. NOTE: THE CITY WILL ACCEPT ALTERNATIVE
 BICYCLE PARKING RACKS THAT ARE COMPLIMENTARY TO THE
 BUILDING USE IF THEY ARE DESIGNED TO ALLOW BICYCLES TO
 BE CORRECTLY SECURED TO THEM. ALTERNATIVE RACKS COULD
 BE IN THE SHAPE OF A MUSIC INSTRUMENT, THE
 THALIA/MELPOMENE MASKS, OR A MUSIC NOTE. STAFF IS
 WILLING TO DISCUSS CREATIVE BICYCLE RACK OPTIONS.
 B. BICYCLE PARKING FACILITIES SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE
 SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 94-485(Q)(2), NOT
 HIDDEN AT THE REAR OF THE BUILDING.
 C. THE PLANS SHALL CLEARLY SHOW THE BICYCLE PAD
 DIMENSIONS AND RACKS IN CONFORMANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS
 AS WELL AS PROVIDE A DETAIL SHEET SHOWING THE ACTUAL
 PAD AND RACK DIMENSIONS.
  
 18) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SITE DATA TABLE IS INADEQUATE.
 IT FAILS TO PROVIDE SUCH AS TOTAL BUILDING AREA, LOT
 COVERAGE, OPEN SPACE, ETC. FOR THE DRI PORTION OF THE
 SITE INDEPENDENT OF THE DMP PORTION OF THE SITE. THE
 ADDITIONAL BUILDING REQUIREMENTS TABLE FAILS TO PROVIDE
 THE INFORMATION FOR ALL FRONTAGES. ADDITIONALLY, THE
 TABLE MUST INCLUDE THE CALCULATIONS SO THAT STAFF CAN
 VERIFY THE INFORMATION PRESENTED SUCH AS THE FACADES
 MEETING THE FENESTRATION PERCENTAGES.
  
 19) CITY STAFF HAS CONTACTED THE TROLLEY OPERATOR TO
 DETERMINE THE FEASIBILITY OF USING THE ARTIST DROP-OFF
 AS A TURNAROUND LOCATION. STAFF WILL NOT BE MOVING THE
 APPLICATION FORWARD WITHOUT A SATISFACTORY RESOLUTION
 TO THE TROLLEY TURNAROUND.
  
 20) ACCESS EASEMENTS ARE REQUIRED FOR SIDEWALKS AND
 RIGHT-OF-WAY PROVIDED ON THE KRAVIS CENTER PROPERTY
 UNLESS THE ROADWAY AUTHORITY REQUIRES THAT THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY BE DEDICATED TO THE AUTHORITY.
  
 21) THE SITE PLAN CALLS OUT THE SIGNAL POLE AT THE
 CORNER OF SAPODILLA AVENUE AND OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AS
 BEING RELOCATED. WHERE WILL THIS BE RELOCATED TOO?
 PROVIDE APPROVAL FROM FDOT OR PALM BEACH COUNTY THAT
 THIS SIGNAL POLE MAY BE RELOCATED.
  
 22) REPEAT COMMENT: NO OVERALL DETAILED OVERALL SIGNAGE
 PLAN WAS SUBMITTED FOR THE AREA WITHIN THE DRI.
  
 A. PROVIDE GRAPHICS, WITH DIMENSIONS, ON THE PLANS TO
 SHOW THE DREYFOOS HALL PLAZA SIGN.
 B. THE SIGN CALCULATIONS FOR THE ARTIST ENTRANCE SIGN
 WERE NOT PROVIDED. THE SIGN BAND MAY OCCUPY A MAXIMUM
 OF 60 PERCENT OF THE NORTH DRYFOOS HALL BUILDING FACADE
 (DIMENSION NOT PROVIDED).
 C. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND DETAILS OF THE SAPODILLA VALET
 DIRECTIONAL SIGNS. THESE SIGNS MUST BE SITED TO AVOID
 THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE
  
 23) THE DRI PERMITS WAIVERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION
 94-207 OF THE ZLDR. STAFF DOES NOT FIND THAT THE
 REQUESTED WAIVERS PROVIDE FOR INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING
 AND DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES THAT CREATE MORE DESIRABLE
 AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY.
  
 24) REPEAT COMMENT: IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DRI ADOPTING
 ORDINANCE, THE KRAVIS CENTER PROPERTY SHALL BE PLATTED.
 THE PREVIOUS OVERSIGHT OF THIS REQUIREMENT DOES NOT
 RESOLVE THE PLATTING REQUIREMENT.
  
 25) THE PLAN MUST BE PRESENTED TO THE CITYPLACE
 COURTYARDS AND CONDO ASSOCIATIONS PRIOR TO STAFF
 SCHEDULING THE CASE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING. STAFF MUST BE
 MADE AWARE OF THE MEETING SO THAT A REPRESENTATIVE CAN
 ATTEND.
  
 26) HAS CONSIDERATION BEEN MADE TO PROVIDING CHARGING
 STATIONS FOR ELECTRIC CARS ON SITE?
  
 27) YOU MAY NOT RESERVE DRI CAPACITY FOR THE OUTDOOR
 THEATER THAT IS BEING DEMOLISHED.
  
  
  
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved