| Date |
Text |
| 2016-08-10 13:00:56 | PLANNING BOARD CASE NO. 1000E |
| | KRAVIS CENTER LEVEL III SITE PLAN ? DREYFOOS HALL AND |
| | VALET GARAGE |
| | 701 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN |
| | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, |
| | AUGUST 26, 2016, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE |
| | OCTOBER 18, 2016 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY OCTOBER 10, |
| | 2016), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY |
| | FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 1) PLANNING STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THIS APPLICATION AS |
| | SUBMITTED. NOT ONLY DOES IT NOT COMPLY WITH THE SITE |
| | DESIGN QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, BUT IT ALSO |
| | FAILS TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO PROVIDE A |
| | FULL ANALYSIS OF THE REQUEST. STAFF HAS DONE ITS BEST |
| | TO PROVIDE AS COMPREHENSIVE AS POSSIBLE COMMENTS BASED |
| | ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 2) STAFF STRONGLY ENCOURAGES THE ENTIRE SITE BEING |
| | BROUGHT UNDER ONE SET OF REGULATIONS, EITHER WITHIN THE |
| | CITYPLACE DRI OR THE DMP. |
| | |
| | 3) STAFF IS UNCLEAR AS TO THE DESIGN OF THE NEW PLAZA |
| | AREA AT THE CORNER OF OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AND |
| | SAPODILLA AVENUE. |
| | A. SHEET AE201 AND THE RENDERINGS PROVIDE INSUFFICIENT |
| | DETAIL FOR STAFF TO REVIEW. CROSS SECTIONS AND |
| | ELEVATIONS AT A BIGGER SCALE, WITH DIMENSIONS, ARE |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | B. THE CIVIL PLANS FAIL TO SHOW THE ELEVATION POINTS |
| | FOR THE NEW PLAZA LAYOUT. |
| | C. THE HARDSCAPE PLANS, WHICH ARE ACTUALLY THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLANS, FAIL TO DEFINE THE MATERIALS PROPOSED |
| | FOR THE PLAZA. |
| | |
| | 4) PROVIDE THE ELEVATIONS FOR THE NEW LOBBY EXPANSION |
| | AT A BIGGER SCALE, WITH DIMENSIONS. |
| | |
| | 5) PROVIDE THE ELEVATIONS AT A BIGGER SCALE AND THE |
| | CROSS SECTIONS, INCLUDING DIMENSIONS, FOR THE DRYFOOS |
| | HALL PORTE COCHERE. PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THIS SHALL |
| | PROVIDE ADEQUATE HEIGHT FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES. |
| | A. PROVIDE THE AUTOTURN DRAWINGS TO SHOW THAT FULL |
| | SIZED BUSSES AND EMERGENCY VEHICLES CAN ENTER AND EXIT |
| | THIS AREA. |
| | B. WILL THIS AREA BE USED FOR VALET? |
| | C. PLEASE DESCRIBE HOW THE BOX OFFICE PARKING IS |
| | ACCESSED BY SOMEONE WISHING TO PURCHASE A TICKET. THE |
| | ARROWS INDICATE THAT THEY WOULD NEED TO DRIVE UNDER THE |
| | BUS DROP-OFF AREA PRIOR TO ACCESSING THE PARKING. |
| | D. THE SITE PLAN AND THE PAVING PLAN (SHEET PD-1) DO |
| | NOT SHOW THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM THE ADA PARKING |
| | SPACE TO THE BUILDING. |
| | E. PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS AND PARKING DETAILS FOR THE |
| | BOX OFFICE PARKING SPACES. PLEASE NOTE THAT 90 DEGREE |
| | PARKING SPACES REQUIRE A 24 FOOT DRIVE AISLE. |
| | |
| | 6) THE SIDEWALK ALONG OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD THAT IS |
| | SHOWN ON THE KRAVIS CENTER SITE ADJACENT TO THE |
| | PROPOSED RIGHT TURN LANE IS SHOWN AT FIVE (5) FEET IN |
| | WIDTH. THIS SIDEWALK SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF SIX (6) FEET |
| | IN WIDTH AS IT IS WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| | |
| | 7) PLEASE PROVIDE THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM OKEECHOBEE |
| | BOULEVARD AND SAPODILLA AVENUE TO THE DREYFOOS HALL. |
| | |
| | 8) PROVIDE THE ELEVATIONS AT A BIGGER SCALE AND THE |
| | CROSS SECTIONS, INCLUDING DIMENSIONS, FOR THE SAPODILLA |
| | AVENUE VALET DROP-OFF. PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THIS SHALL |
| | PROVIDE ADEQUATE HEIGHT FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES. |
| | A. SHOW STACKING DIMENSIONS FOR THE ENTRY CONDITION. |
| | THERE SHALL BE NO BACK-UP INTO SAPODILLA AVENUE AND |
| | INTO OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD FROM THE LEFT TURN LANE. |
| | B. THE LANES SHALL NOT BE 12 FEET WIDE AT THE ENTRANCE |
| | TO THE SITE. THIS IS EXCESSIVE AND DOES NOT PROMOTE |
| | PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AS REQUIRED BY THE SITE DESIGN |
| | CRITERIA. ADDITIONALLY, THE DOWNTOWN REGULATION LIMITS |
| | THE WIDTH OF DRIVE AISLES TO 25 FEET IN WIDTH; |
| | THEREFORE, THERE MAY ONLY BE TWO DRIVEWAY OPENINGS. THE |
| | LANES MAY BE INCREASED TO THREE AND WIDENED ONCE |
| | FURTHER ON THE SITE. |
| | C. THE THREE EXIT LANES FROM THE VALET AREA DO NOT |
| | COMPLY WITH THE SITE DESIGN CRITERIA FOR ACCESS TO |
| | PUBLIC WAYS AND THE DESIGN OF ACCESS AND EGRESS DRIVES. |
| | THE CITY'S TRAFFIC ENGINEER WILL ONLY PERMIT TWO EXIT |
| | LANES SINCE THREE EXIT LANES WILL CREATE CONFUSION AND |
| | BE UNSAFE FOR PEOPLE EXITING THE SITE DEPENDING ON |
| | WHICH LANE THEY HAVE BEEN GIVEN THEIR VEHICLE AND THEIR |
| | ULTIMATE DESTINATION AND THE NON-KRAVIS CENTER USERS OF |
| | SAPODILLA AVENUE. |
| | D. THE SURFACE (VALET?) LOT SHALL BE SETBACK 16 FEET |
| | PLUS A 5 (FIVE) FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER (21 FEET TOTAL) |
| | FROM THE CURB IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE |
| | ADJOINING CULTURAL ARTS DISTRICT REGULATIONS. WILL THIS |
| | LOT EVER BE USED FOR SELF-PARK OPERATIONS? PROVIDE |
| | VERIFICATION FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DIVISION |
| | THAT THIS PARKING AREA DOES NOT REQUIRE AN ADA PARKING |
| | SPACE. |
| | E. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE VALET INGRESS/EGRESS ON |
| | IRIS STREET? WHAT IS THE WIDTH? WHY DOES IT NEED TO BE |
| | TWO-WAY IF IT IS ONLY FOR VALETS? THE PROPOSED VALET |
| | DRIVE ONTO IRIS STREET EXCEEDS THE TWO (2) CURB CUTS |
| | PERMITTED BY SECTION 94-313(1) AND THE SEPARATE OF |
| | ACCESS POINTS CRITERIA IN SECTION 94-313(2). THIS |
| | ADDITIONAL ACCESS POINT FAILS TO ADHERE TO THE SITE |
| | DESIGN STANDARDS OF IMPROVING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY SINCE |
| | MORE CURB CUTS CREATE MORE POSSIBLE VEHICLE PEDESTRIAN |
| | CONFLICTS. |
| | F. IF THE VALET DRIVE ONTO IRIS STREET IS ABSOLUTELY |
| | NECESSARY, THEN EITHER REMOVE THE EXISTING DRIVEWAYS |
| | IMMEDIATELY TO THE WEST TO ELIMINATE EXISTING CURB CUTS |
| | OR REDESIGN THE VALET EGRESS ROUTE TO COMBINE IT WITH |
| | THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY. |
| | |
| | 9) THE SAPODILLA VALET GARAGE IS NOT DESIGNED IN |
| | CONFORMANCE WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE ADJOINING |
| | CULTURAL ARTS DISTRICT REGULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY THE |
| | SITE DESIGN CRITERIA. |
| | A. THE CULTURAL ARTS DISTRICT REQUIRES BUILDINGS ON |
| | SECONDARY STREETS TO BE SETBACK 16 FEET FROM THE BACK |
| | OF THE CURB. |
| | B. THE CULTURAL ARTS DISTRICT REQUIRES BUILDINGS ON |
| | SECONDARY STREETS TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF 30 PERCENT OF |
| | THE BUILDING BE ACTIVE USE. |
| | |
| | 10) NO DETAILS ON THE SAPODILLA VALET GARAGE WERE |
| | PROVIDED. |
| | A. PROVIDE FLOOR PLANS, WITH DIMENSIONS, FOR EACH LEVEL |
| | OF THE GARAGE. |
| | B. PROVIDE ELEVATIONS WITH THE HEIGHT DIMENSIONS OF THE |
| | GARAGE. |
| | C. PROVIDE DETAILS, INCLUDING SECTION DRAWINGS, FOR THE |
| | PROPOSED GARAGE CLADDING. |
| | D. IF PROVIDED, PROVIDE HOW ROOFTOP PARKING COMPLIES |
| | WITH SECTION 94-111(Q) |
| | |
| | 13) HOW WILL PEOPLE KNOW TO USE THE SAPODILLA VALET? |
| | DIRECTIONAL SIGNS MAY NOT BE INSTALLED IN THE |
| | OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD MEDIAN OR IN OTHER RIGHTS-OF-WAY. |
| | |
| | 14) PROVIDE HOW THE PROPOSED NEW DEVELOPMENT WILL |
| | COMPLY WITH THE ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES REQUIRED |
| | BY ORDINANCE NO. 4412-12, EXHIBIT D. |
| | |
| | 15) PROVIDE LIGHTING AND PHOTOMETRIC PLANS FOR THE NEW |
| | DEVELOPMENT. |
| | |
| | 16) BICYCLE PARKING FACILITIES SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | SITE BASED ON THE NUMBER OF NEW PARKING SPACES. PROVIDE |
| | DETAILS. |
| | |
| | 17) PROVIDE FLOOR PLANS, WITH DIMENSIONS, FOR EACH |
| | LEVEL OF THE GARAGE, BOTH EXISTING AND PROPOSED. |
| | A. THE 3RD FLOOR PLAN SHALL SHOW HOW THE RAMP WILL |
| | ATTACH TO THE GARAGE WALL GIVEN THE EXISTING SUPPORT |
| | COLUMNS. |
| | B. THE PARKING LAYOUT SHOWN ON SHEET SP.1, INCLUDING |
| | DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW AND PARKING SPACE ANGLE, IS |
| | OPPOSITE THE WAY IT CURRENTLY EXISTS FOR THE OUTER |
| | PARKING SPACES. THIS WOULD REQUIRE THE RESTRIPE OF EACH |
| | FLOOR. |
| | C. THE PLANS SHALL NOT MAKE IT LOOK LIKE THE RAMP IS |
| | COMING OFF OF THE 5TH FLOOR OF THE GARAGE. |
| | |
| | 18) PROVIDE ELEVATIONS AND SECTION DRAWINGS, INCLUDING |
| | DIMENSIONS, FOR THE NEW GARAGE RAMP AND SCREENING, |
| | PARTICULARLY WHERE IT CONNECTS TO THE 3RD FLOOR WITHIN |
| | THE DRI. INSUFFICIENT DETAILS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 19) THE SITE DATA TABLE IS INADEQUATE. IT FAILS TO |
| | PROVIDE SUCH AS TOTAL BUILDING AREA, LOT COVERAGE, OPEN |
| | SPACE, ETC. |
| | |
| | 18) THERE ARE 24 ADA PARKING SPACES REQUIRED FOR 1,411 |
| | PARKING SPACES. |
| | |
| | 20) PLEASE ADDRESS THE REMOVAL OF THE TROLLEY STOP FROM |
| | THE SITE. THE TROLLEY SERVICE SERVES TO REINFORCE THE |
| | EFFICIENT MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE DOWNTOWN IN ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH THE TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY EXCEPTION AREA FOR |
| | DOWNTOWN WEST PALM BEACH. THE DRI REQUIRES THAT |
| | DEVELOPERS COOPERATE WITH THE CITY TO LOCATE BUS, AND |
| | BY EXTENSION TROLLEY STOPS IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS. |
| | THE KRAVIS CENTER STOP HAS BEEN A KEY STOP AND |
| | TURN-AROUND LOCATION FOR THE 10 PLUS YEARS THE TROLLEY |
| | HAS BEEN IN OPERATION. HOW WILL THE KRAVIS CENTER |
| | ASSIST IN PROVIDING AN ALTERNATE STOP AND TURN-AROUND |
| | LOCATION THAT DOES NOT INCREASE TROLLEY HEADWAY TIMES? |
| | |
| | 21) ACCESS EASEMENTS ARE REQUIRED FOR SIDEWALKS AND |
| | RIGHT-OF-WAY PROVIDED ON THE KRAVIS CENTER PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 22) PLEASE NOTE THAT NEW CONSTRUCTION IS NOT EXEMPT |
| | FROM MEETING THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE XIV. |
| | THE SECTION CITED (94-441) EXEMPTS AREAS OUTSIDE THE |
| | LIMITS OF WORK THAT CURRENTLY DO NOT MEET CODE FROM |
| | BEING REQUIRED TO MEET CODE. MANY AREAS SHOWN ON THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN WITHIN THE SCOPE OF WORK DO NOT COMPLY |
| | WITH CITY LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 23) CONTRARY TO THE JUSTIFICATION LETTER, THERE IS NO |
| | OVERALL DETAILED OVERALL SIGNAGE PLAN SUBMITTED WITH |
| | THIS APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 24) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DRI ADOPTING ORDINANCE, THE |
| | KRAVIS CENTER PROPERTY SHALL BE PLATTED. |
| | |
| | 25) HAS THIS PLAN BEEN PRESENTED TO THE CITYPLACE |
| | COURTYARDS AND CONDO ASSOCIATIONS? |
| | |
| | 25) SHOW THE PROPERTY LINE ON THE DEMOLITION PLAN. |
| | |
| | 26) PROVIDE THE FDOT PREDETERMINATION LETTER FOR THE |
| | MODIFICATIONS TO THE SAPODILLA AVENUE INTERSECTION |
| | MODIFICATION. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
