| Date |
Text |
| 2016-07-12 16:59:34 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) THE PROPOSED FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) OF 2.43 AND |
| | DENSITY OF 53.77 DWELLING UNITS/GROSS ACRE EXCEEDS THE |
| | MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE FAR OF 1.5 AND DENSITY OF 32.27 |
| | DWELLING UNIT/GROSS ACRE ALLOWED BY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, |
| | FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT (FLUE) POLICY 1.1.3. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-207(A)(1)B., S.94-207(D)(5), S.94-243, TABLE |
| | VIII-3] |
| | |
| | 2.) THE SCALE OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS SIGNIFICANTLY |
| | OUT OF PROPORTION WITH THE ONE AND TWO STORY |
| | SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS IMMEDIATELY EAST OF |
| | THE SUBJECT PROPERTY (EL CID HISTORIC DISTRICT). STAFF |
| | ADVISES THE APPLICANT TO SCALE THE PROJECT BACK (I.E. |
| | MASSING, DENSITY, FAR, HEIGHT) IN ORDER TO BE MORE |
| | COMPATIBLE WITH THE SCALE OF THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL |
| | NEIGHBORHOOD. |
| | |
| | 3.) THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING A TOTAL OF FOURTEEN (14) |
| | WAIVERS FOR THE PROJECT, WHICH SEEMS EXCESSIVE. THE |
| | APPLICANT NEEDS TO PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION TO JUSTIFY |
| | THE NEED FOR EACH WAIVER (I.E. ARE THERE SITE/DESIGN |
| | CONSTRAINTS? WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS FOR WAIVING EACH |
| | REQUIREMENT AND HOW WILL IT BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY/CITY? |
| | WHAT ARE THE IMPACTS AND HOW ARE THE IMPACTS BEING |
| | MITIGATED IN THE SITE DESIGN? HAVE OTHER ALTERNATIVES |
| | BEEN EXPLORED? ). THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR EACH |
| | WAIVER IS NEEDED IN ORDER TO DETERMINE THE VALIDITY OF |
| | EACH WAIVER REQUEST. |
| | |
| | 4.) A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW LETTER |
| | FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION VERIFYING |
| | THAT THE PROJECT MEETS THE TPS STANDARDS OF THE COUNTY |
| | IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 5.) A LETTER FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY CONFIRMING THAT THE PROJECT MEETS CONCURRENCY |
| | FOR SCHOOLS IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 6.) PURSUANT TO ZLDR S.94-207(B)(1), THE PLANNED |
| | DEVELOPMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH SUBSECTION 94-35(C) (SITE |
| | DESIGN QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS). PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE WRITTEN STATEMENTS TO HOW EACH STANDARD OF ZLDR |
| | S.94-35(C) IS ADDRESSED FOR THE PROJECT. |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PURSUANT TO ZLDR S.94-207(D)(8), ANY SOURCE OF |
| | ILLUMINATION LOCATED WITHIN A COMMERCIAL PLANNED |
| | DEVELOPMENT (CPD) SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE (1) FOOT CANDLE |
| | AT OR BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF SUCH DEVELOPMENT AND IN |
| | EXCESS OF 0.5 FOOT CANDLES WHEN MEASURED IN A |
| | RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT. THE APPLICANT MUST |
| | DEMONSTRATE HOW THIS REQUIREMENT WILL BE MET. |
| | |
| | 2.) LOADING INGRESS AND EGRESS CONFIGURATIONS WHICH |
| | REQUIRE BACKING DIRECTLY ONTO A STREET FROM A LOADING |
| | SPACE IS PROHIBITED. THE PROPOSED LOADING AREAS DO NOT |
| | SEEM ADEQUATE FOR LARGER TRUCKS TO MANEUVER ON SITE. |
| | [ZLDR S.94-485(J)(1)] |
| | |
| | 3.) DIMENSIONS AND DETAILS TO BE PROVIDED IN THE PLANS |
| | (I.E. PARKING STALL DETAIL, STALL/AISLE WIDTH |
| | DIMENSIONS, ETC.) |
| | |
| | |
| | HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) HPB CASE NO. 16-58 (Z16060056): CERTIFICATE OF |
| | APPROPRIATENESS (COA) FOR THE DEMOLITION OF ACCESSORY |
| | STRUCTURE AND PLACEMENT OF GARAGE RAMP ON THE WEST SIDE |
| | OF THE LOT: |
| | |
| | - PROVIDE ACCURATE SCOPE OF WORK DESCRIPTION. |
| | CURRENTLY, THE APPLICATION IS REQUESTING OFF-SITE |
| | PARKING LOT. |
| | |
| | - PROVIDE PICTURES OF THE GARAGE/SITE IN QUESTION. |
| | |
| | - PROVIDE STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING REPORTS TO WHY THE |
| | GARAGE NEEDS TO BE DEMOLISHED. |
| | |
| | - REQUIREMENTS FOR DEMOLITION ARE NOT COMPLETE. SEE |
| | REQUIREMENT STANDARDS IN THE COA APPLICATION (LINK: HTT |
| | P://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/DEVELOPMENT-SERVICES/HISTORIC-P |
| | RESERVATION/APPLICATIONS?PAGE=2) |
| | |
| | - SHOW ELEVATIONS OF NEW SITE WITHOUT GARAGE. |
| | |
| | - DEMONSTRATE WHY THE GARAGE CANNOT REMAIN IN PLACE. |
| | FROM THE SUBMITTED PLANS, IT APPEARS TO HAVE ROOM. |
| | |
| | 2.) HPB CASE NO. 16-57 (Z16060057): CLASS B SPECIAL USE |
| | PERMIT TO ALLOW AN OFF-SITE ACCESSORY PARKING LOT: |
| | WAIVER #1 ? TO ALLOW RELIEF FROM THE 5 FT. WIDE BUFFER |
| | ALONG ALL PROPERTY LINES; WAIVER #2 ? TO ALLOW RELIEF |
| | FROM THE OPAQUE WALL ALONG THE SIDE PROPERTY LINES: |
| | |
| | - PROVIDE ACCURATE SCOPE OF WORK DESCRIPTION. PAGE 2 OF |
| | THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INCLUDES AN OFF-SITE |
| | PARKING LOT AS WELL AS SUBTERRANEAN PARKING. SURFACE |
| | PARKING WILL NOT BE SUPPORTED BY STAFF. |
| | |
| | - WAIVER #1 DOES NOT HAVE ENOUGH JUSTIFICATION, NOR |
| | DOES THE LANDSCAPE PLAN REFLECT A SINGLE-FAMILY |
| | RESIDENCE STYLE OF LANDSCAPING AS INDICATED IN THE |
| | NARRATIVE. ROOM EXISTS FOR ADDITIONAL BUFFERING AND A |
| | MORE RESIDENTIAL PLAN. |
| | |
| | - WAIVER #2 DOES NOT HAVE ENOUGH JUSTIFICATION TO |
| | ELIMINATE THE 5 FT. HIGH WALL AT THE REAR (NORTH) |
| | PROPERTY LINE, EAST OR WEST PROPERTY LINE FROM RAMP |
| | OPENING TO THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE. |
| | |
| | * ONCE THESE ITEMS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED AND ITEMS |
| | SUBMITTED, CASES WILL BE SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING. |
| | |
| | * CONTACT FRIEDERIKE MITTNER, HISTORIC PRESERVATION |
| | PLANNER, @ (561) 822-1457 IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TEN |
| | (10) COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (8.5 BY 11), AND AN |
| | ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE |
| | NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% ($600) OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | *CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 855-1458 IF THERE ARE |
| | QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
