| Date |
Text |
| 2017-01-06 16:07:39 | CASE PB 1709 |
| | PROJECT NAME: JOSEPHS VILLAGE |
| | ADDRESS: 2210 N. AUSTRALIAN AVE. |
| | |
| | - CONTACT HEATHER M. TRIBOU @ (561) 822-1562/ |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | - PEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN |
| | FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN |
| | (11)/FIVE (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN |
| | .PNG/.PDF FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES |
| | ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF |
| | INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON MONDAY, |
| | JANUARY 27, 2017, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE MARCH |
| | PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY MARCH 14, 2017), |
| | THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER |
| | ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WERE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. SINCE |
| | PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE |
| | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED |
| | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL |
| | APPLICATION FEE ($769.00). |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENTS |
| | 1- PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE CITY'S PUBLIC |
| | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR |
| | WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE |
| | COLLECTION SERVICES. |
| | 2- PROVIDE LETTER FROM COMCAST THE CONFIRMING THAT THE |
| | PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS |
| | OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR |
| | SERVICES |
| | 3- ASIDE FROM EXISTING WALKWAYS, THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT COULD BENEFIT WITH THE ADDITION OF STREET |
| | FURNITURE. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PEDESTRIAN AMENITIES |
| | (I.E. BENCHES, ETC.) THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT SITE. |
| | AMENDMENT TO COMMENT: NO NEW BENCHES ARE LOCATED NEAR |
| | THE PROPOSED 6 STORY BUILDING AND NO DETAIL WAS |
| | PROVIDED. |
| | 4- SITE PLAN-LOCATE ALL EASEMENTS AND REFERENCE BOOK |
| | AND PAGE. AMENDMENT TO COMMENT: STILL MISSING FORCE |
| | MAIN LOCATION, AS FIELD LOCATED BY CITY, AND REQUIRED |
| | EASEMENT. THIS MAY CONFLICT WITH DUMPSTER LOCATION AND |
| | LOADING LOCATION. |
| | 5- SITE PLAN-LABEL FENCES AND ANY GATES AND MEASURE |
| | DISTANCE FROM FENCE TO PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. AMENDMENT |
| | TO COMMENT: STILL MISSING ALL LABELING OF EXISTING AND |
| | PROPOSED FENCING AND GATES. A GATE IS REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | SIDEWALK AND WILL NEED A DETAIL. |
| | 6- SITE PLAN- ADD ANY HYDRANTS AND WATER VALVES. |
| | AMENDMENT TO COMMENT: IT APPEARS THAT THERE IS AN |
| | EXISTING BACKFLOW PREVENTER THAT IS IN CONFLICT WITH |
| | THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK LEADING TO THE ROW. |
| | 7- SITE PLAN- PROVIDE REQUIRED BIKE RACK. AMENDMENT TO |
| | COMMENT: BIKE RACK REQUIREMENT IS 1 BIKE RACK SPACE FOR |
| | 20 AUTOMOBILE SPACES. UPDATE PLANS PER 94-486. IT IS |
| | PREFERRED TO HAVE A BIKE RACK AT FRONT ENTRY NEAR |
| | CLUBHOUSE. |
| | 8- SITE PLAN- ALL PARKING SPACES MUST BE PAVED. REMOVE |
| | RESERVE PARKING. AMENDMENT TO COMMENT: RESERVE PARKING |
| | IS NOT PERMITTED IN RETENTION AREAS AND IN AREAS THAT |
| | DO NOT MEET MINIMUM PARKING DIMENSION STANDARDS. IN |
| | ADDITION, RESERVE PARKING CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING |
| | LANDSCAPING. RECALCULATE RESERVE PARKING IN AREAS THAT |
| | MEET MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS. |
| | 9- SITE PLAN- PROVIDE TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS AND TOTAL |
| | NUMBER OF BEDS. AMENDMENT TO COMMENT: NUMBER STILL |
| | INCORRECT COMPARED TO PERMIT SET ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR |
| | PLANS SUBMITTED FOR CHANGE OF USE AND ARCHITECTURAL |
| | FLOOR PLANS SUBMITTED FOR THIS REZONING IN OCTOBER. IN |
| | ADDITION, PLEASE PROVIDE IN CHART AS DISCUSSED IN |
| | PROJECT MEETING. NOTE THAT SECTION 94-273 (D)(28)7. |
| | READS LICENSED NURSING HOMES IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS |
| | MAY HAVE 2.5 TIMES AS MANY BEDS AS DWELLING UNITS |
| | PERMITTED IN THAT DISTRICT. |
| | 10- SITE PLAN- PROVIDE A BUS PARKING SPACE. AMENDMENT |
| | TO COMMENT: THIS IS FOR THE EXISTING BUS CURRENTLY |
| | LOCATED ON SITE. A BUS CANNOT BE PARKED IN FRONT OF THE |
| | TRASH. |
| | 11- SITE PLAN-PROVIDE REQUIRED LOADING SPACE. AMENDMENT |
| | TO COMMENT: CANNOT BLOCK ACCESS TO TRASH. |
| | 12- CIVIL PLANS- DOES NOT INCLUDE PARKING LOT WORK. |
| | AMENDMENT TO COMMENT: CIVIL PLANS DO NOT INCLUDE ANY |
| | REMOVAL OF PARKING SPACES TO ADD REQUIRED LANDSCAPE |
| | ISLANDS. |
| | 13- A LIGHTING PLAN IS REQUIRED TO MEET ALL FOOT CANDLE |
| | REQUIREMENTS. AMENDMENT TO COMMENT: THE LIGHTING PLAN |
| | IS TO SHOW THAT THE LIGHT DOES NOT PROVIDE OF SITE |
| | GLARE. REVISE TO SHOW THAT PROPOSED ILLUMINATION DOES |
| | NOT EXCEED ONE FOOT CANDLE BEYOND PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. |
| | 14- LANDSCAPE PLAN- PROVIDE ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED |
| | LIGHT POLES, HYDRANTS AND WATER VALVES. AMENDMENT TO |
| | COMMENT: MISSING FORCE MAIN. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS |
| | 15- SHOW EXISTING TREES ON LANDSCAPE PLANS INCLUDING |
| | TREES ALONG FENCE AT ROW. THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK MAY |
| | CONFLICT WITH AN EXISTING TREE. |
| | 16- THE DUMPSTER LOCATED 2 FEET FROM THE RESIDENTAIL |
| | WINDOWS OF THE BUILDING IS NOT PREFERED. PROVIDE |
| | DUMPSTER DETAIL IN ACCORDANCE WITH 94-444(B) |
| | 17-PARKING IN SITE DATA DIFFER FROM ACTUAL COUNTS OF |
| | PARKING ON SITE PLAN |
| | 18-BUILDING C MISLABELED FOR NUMBER OF BEDS |
| | 19- JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT SAYS EXISTING 257 UNITS AND |
| | PLANS AND PAST APPROVAL SAY 252 UNITS |
| | 20-PLEASE PROVIDE THAT PROPOSED ARCHITECTURE MEETS |
| | APPLICABLE LICENSING CRITERIA ESTABLISHED BY DEPARTMENT |
| | OF STATE. |
| | 21-PROVIDE IN THE JUSTIFICATION ON HOW THE ADDITIONAL |
| | BEDS WILL NOT RESULT IN A CONCENTRATION OF GROUP HOMES |
| | IN THE AREA. |
| | 22- BUILDING AND/OR LANDSCAPE ISLAND MAY BE NEED TO BE |
| | REDUCED TO PROVIDE EFFICIENT DROP-OFF SPACE AND PASS |
| | THROUGH AT PORT COCHERE. |
| | 23- PROVIDE IN JUSTIFICATION HOW PROPOSED ARCHITECTURE |
| | IN INNOVATIVE DESIGN AS REQUIRED IN A PB BEYOND |
| | MATCHING EXISTING 1986 ARCHITECTURE. |
| | |
| |
Print |
