| Date |
Text |
| 2016-07-12 14:06:15 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) THE PLANS SHOW THE COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT |
| | (CPD) DIVIDED INTO SEPARATE PARCELS BY PROPERTY LINE. |
| | IF THE DEVELOPER INTENDS TO SUBDIVIDE THE CPD, ALL |
| | STRUCTURES WITHIN EACH SUBDIVIDED PARCEL WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED TO MEET THE MINIMUM DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, |
| | BUILDING SETBACKS AND LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS PER THE |
| | ZLDR FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL PARCEL. IF THE MINIMUM |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS CANNOT BE MET, THE DEVELOPER |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED TO SEEK WAIVERS FROM THE CPD. THE |
| | WAIVERS MUST BE SPECIFIED IN THE APPLICATION (IF |
| | APPLICABLE). |
| | |
| | 2.) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT WILL NEED TO BE REVISED |
| | IF WAIVERS TO THE PROJECT ARE BEING REQUESTED. THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL NEED TO PROVIDE A LIST OF WAIVER(S) AND |
| | JUSTIFICATION FOR EACH WAIVER. |
| | |
| | 3.) THE TRAFFIC STUDY SEEMS TO BE MISSING FROM THE |
| | APPLICATION PACKET. PLEASE SUBMIT A TRAFFIC STUDY FOR |
| | THE CITY'S ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT TO REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 4.) A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW LETTER |
| | FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION STATING |
| | THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT MEETS THE TPS OF THE COUNTY |
| | IS REQUIRED. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE TPS APPROVAL LETTER |
| | MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULING OF THIS |
| | APPLICATION FOR A PUBLIC HEARING. |
| | |
| | 5.) PROVIDE AN ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY. |
| | |
| | 6.) REVISE THE STANDARDS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE (ZLDR |
| | S.94-32(A), AMENDMENT AND REZONING STANDARDS) TO |
| | SPECIFY HOW EACH STANDARD IS ADDRESSED FOR THE PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 7.) SHEET A4.1 SEEMS TO BE MISSING FROM THE PLANS |
| | PACKET. |
| | |
| | |
| | MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN: (SHEET MP-1) |
| | |
| | 1.) CLARIFY NOTE: "USES PERMITTED IN THIS CPD SHALL |
| | INCLUDE ALL USES PERMITTED BY RIGHT WITHIN THE GENERAL |
| | COMMERCIAL (GC) ZONING DISTRICT AND ADDITIONAL USES AS |
| | APPROVED PER ORDINANCE NO. 4572-15." |
| | |
| | 2.) THE FAR FOR THE WAWA PROJECT IS 0.02 (NOT 0.04). |
| | PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN: |
| | |
| | 1.) PEDESTRIAN CROSS ACCESS TO ADJACENT PARCELS (I.E. |
| | WAWA SITE) SHALL BE INCORPORATED INTO THE DESIGN OF THE |
| | PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 2.) REVISE PLANS TO SHOW BETTER VEHICULAR CROSS ACCESS |
| | BETWEEN THE WAWA SITE AND THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT |
| | IMMEDIATELY EAST OF THE WAWA SITE. [SEE MARK-UP PLANS |
| | BY STAFF] |
| | |
| | 3.) THE PROPOSED ORIENTATION OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE |
| | SEEMS TO BE INEFFECTIVE FOR DUMP TRUCKS TO EASILY |
| | ACCESS. RELOCATE AND/OR ANGLE THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE |
| | FOR BETTER DUMP TRUCK ACCESSIBILITY. |
| | |
| | 4.) A MINIMUM OF THREE (3) 10 FT. BY 50 FT. LOADING AND |
| | UNLOADING SPACES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE USE. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-485, TABLE XV-4] |
| | |
| | 5.) INCREASE THE SIZE OF A FEW PARKING STALLS (BOTH |
| | LENGTH AND WIDTH OF STALLS) TO ACCOMMODATE LARGER |
| | VEHICLES FOR THE PROPOSED USE. |
| | |
| | 6.) FOUNDATION PLANTING IS PROPOSED AROUND THE |
| | BUILDING. HOW WIDE IS THE FOUNDATION PLANTING AND |
| | PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY AROUND THE BUILDING? PROVIDE |
| | DIMENSIONS. A MINIMUM UNINTERRUPTED PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY |
| | OF 5 FT. SHALL BE PROVIDED AROUND THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 7.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING INCONSISTENCIES IN THE |
| | DATA TABULAR: A.) CLARIFY THAT THE MAXIMUM FAR FOR THE |
| | OVERALL CPD IS ONE (1.00); B.) CALCULATIONS FOR |
| | BUILDING SETBACK AND LANDSCAPE BUFFERING REQUIREMENTS |
| | ARE INCORRECT IF THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO |
| | SUBDIVIDE THE CPD INTO SMALLER PARCELS BASED ON THE |
| | "PROPERTY LINES" ILLUSTRATED IN THE PLANS; C.) CORRECT |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR THE PARKING REQUIREMENT; D.) ADD |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR LOADING ZONE REQUIREMENT; E.) ADD |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR BICYCLE PARKING. |
| | |
| | 8.) THE SITE LAYOUT PLAN (SHEET C-5) NEEDS TO BE |
| | UPDATED TO REFLECT THE LATEST CHANGES TO THE WAWA SITE |
| | (PENDING APPLICATION PB 1670C). |
| | |
| | 9.) PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. |
| | |
| | 10.) WILL THERE BE ANY MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ON THE |
| | ROOFTOP? IF SO, ALL ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL |
| | BE SCREENED FROM VIEW BY THE PROPOSED BUILDING PARAPET. |
| | |
| | 11.) BICYCLE PARKING REQUIRED PER ZLDR S.94-485(Q). |
| | |
| | |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN: |
| | 1.) COMMENTS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO BE PROVIDED BY |
| | THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE PLANNER. |
| | |
| | |
| | FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PROVIDE A SECONDARY PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE POINT INTO |
| | THE BUILDING FROM THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 2.) PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL |
| | TREATMENT/FENESTRATION, PARTICULARLY TO THE SOUTH |
| | ELEVATION TO BREAK UP THE BLANK FACADE. |
| | |
| | |
| | LIGHTING: |
| | |
| | 1.) WILL THERE BE ANY SITE LIGHTING PROVIDED FOR THE |
| | PROJECT? IF SO, A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN IS REQUIRED. |
| | PURSUANT TO ZLDR S.94-207(D)(8), ANY SOURCE OF |
| | ILLUMINATION LOCATED WITHIN A CPD SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE |
| | (1) FOOT CANDLE AT OR BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF SUCH |
| | DEVELOPMENT. |
| | |
| | |
| | SIGNAGE: |
| | |
| | 1.) PROVIDE SIGN AREA CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED |
| | WALL SIGNAGE. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE XIII OF THE ZLDRS. |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TEN |
| | (10) COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (8 .5 BY 11), AND AN |
| | ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE |
| | NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% ($600) OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE |
| | QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
