| Date |
Text |
| 2018-03-07 16:29:49 | |
| | ALOFT HOTEL/INDIGO HOTEL/ROSEMARY RESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC |
| | STUDY (DATED APRIL 12, 2017) COMMENTS: |
| | - DETERMINE THE RADIUS OF DEVELOPMENT INFLUENCE PER |
| | CITY CODE SECTION 94-311(D)(4)F. |
| | - PROVIDE ACCIDENT DATA PER CITY CODE SECTION |
| | 94-311(D)(3)I TO DETERMINE HAZARDOUS INTERSECTIONS. |
| | - USE PEAK SEASON CONVERSION FACTOR (PSCF) INSTEAD OF |
| | SEASONAL FACTOR (SF) TO ADJUST TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOR PEAK |
| | SEASONS. |
| | - INCLUDE ALL PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BUT INCOMPLETE |
| | DEVELOPMENTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF FUTURE BACKGROUND |
| | TRAFFIC. |
| | - IN THE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS, INCLUDE EXISTING AND |
| | FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC AT THE DRIVEWAYS ON WEST |
| | RAILROAD AVENUE. |
| | - PROVIDE DAILY TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES. |
| | - CLARIFY AND PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT TO ILLUSTRATE HOW THE |
| | TRIPS ARE ASSIGNED TO THE ROADWAY NETWORK. SOME OF THE |
| | TRIP ASSIGNMENT DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE CONSISTENT WITH |
| | THE TRIP DISTRIBUTION. FOR EXAMPLE, 30% OF THE TRIPS |
| | ARE DISTRIBUTED TO THE NORTH, BUT LESS THAN 10% OF THE |
| | TRIPS ARE USING ROSEMARY AVENUE NORTH, AND NO TRIPS ARE |
| | USING WEST RAILROAD AVENUE NORTH. |
| | - REVISE THE TRIP ASSIGNMENT TO REFLECT THE LATEST SITE |
| | PLAN. ACCORDING TO THE SITE PLAN, THE ALOFT HOTEL |
| | DRIVEWAY ON 3RD STREET IS FOR SERVICE VEHICLE ONLY, BUT |
| | QUITE A FEW TRIPS ARE SHOWN TO ACCESS THE SITE THROUGH |
| | THIS DRIVEWAY. |
| | - WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, THE 95TH PERCENTILE |
| | QUEUE IN THE EB APPROACH AT QUADRILLE BLVD/3RD STREET |
| | IS FORECAST TO INCREASE FROM APPROXIMATELY 370 FEET TO |
| | APPROXIMATELY 580 FEET DURING WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR. |
| | THIS IS EXPECTED TO SPILL BACK TO THE ROSEMARY |
| | AVENUE/3RD STREET INTERSECTION. PLEASE PROPOSE |
| | MITIGATION MEASURES AT QUADRILLE BLVD/3RD STREET. IT |
| | APPEARS TO BE SUFFICIENT EXISTING PAVEMENT TO PROVIDE |
| | AN EB LEFT-TURN LANE AT QUADRILLE BLVD/3RD STREET WITH |
| | RESTRIPING AND SIGNAL HEAD MODIFICATIONS. |
| | - THE CITY HAS NOT COMPLETED A DETAILED REVIEW OF THE |
| | ANALYSES DUE TO INCOMPLETE INFORMATION AND PEAK SEASON |
| | TRAFFIC VOLUMES. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED |
| | WHEN WE RECEIVE THE REVISED TRAFFIC STUDY. |
| | - INCLUDE IN THE APPENDIX SIGNAL TIMING SHEETS AT THE |
| | STUDY INTERSECTIONS. |
| | SITE PLAN (RECEIVED ON JANUARY 29, 2018) COMMENTS: |
| | ALOFT HOTEL (Z16020017) |
| | - THE GROUND FLOOR HAS 26 OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES BUT |
| | IS LABELED AS 25 SPACES. PLEASE REVISE. |
| | - CLARIFY HOW MANY BICYCLE PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED |
| | WITH THE 3 BIKE RACKS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. PER CITY |
| | CODE SECTION 94-485(Q)(1), A MINIMUM OF 4 BICYCLE |
| | PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED WITH 63 REQUIRED AUTOMOBILE |
| | PARKING SPACES. |
| | - ALIGN THE CURB RAMPS CROSSING 4TH STREET NEAR |
| | ROSEMARY AVENUE WITH THE SIDEWALK. CONSIDER PROVIDING |
| | DECORATIVE CROSSWALK TO MATCH THE CROSSWALK ON 4TH |
| | STREET. |
| | - ADJUST THE LOCATION OF THE PARALLEL PARKING. THE |
| | PARALLEL PARKING SHOWN IS TOO CLOSE TO THE CROSSWALK |
| | PER MUTCD REQUIREMENTS. |
| | - PROVIDE CURB RAMPS AT THE LOCATIONS WHERE IT SAYS |
| | ?PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY? (ON SHEET A-1.00). ALIGN THE CURB |
| | RAMPS AND PROVIDE MARKED CROSSWALK. |
| | - MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 10-FOOT SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF |
| | THE PORTE COCHERE PER CITY CODE SECTION 94-111 AND |
| | FIGURE IV-22. CONSIDER PROVIDING A MINIMUM OF 10-FOOT |
| | SIDE WALK ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE TO MATCH THE |
| | SIDEWALK WIDTH REQUIREMENT OF THE PORTE COCHERE. |
| | - SHOW CROSSWALK CONNECTIONS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE |
| | STREETS. |
| | - THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF COMMENTS RELATING TO |
| | CURB RAMP, CROSSWALK, STOP BAR AND PARALLEL PARKING |
| | LOCATIONS. A SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN, |
| | PREPARED, SIGNED AND SEALED BY A P.E., MUST BE PROVIDED |
| | IN ORDER FOR US TO REVIEW THE SITE PLAN. |
| | - PLEASE RESURFACE THE ROADWAY AND INTERSECTION ALONG |
| | THE ENTIRE PROPERTY FRONTAGE INSTEAD OF THE SECTIONS |
| | WITH DRAINAGE WORK. |
| | - PROVIDE FLUSH SECTION ON ROSEMARY AVENUE TO ALIGN |
| | WITH CITY?S FUTURE PLAN. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH |
| | ENGINEERING ON THE DESIGN. |
| | INDIGO HOTEL (Z16020016) |
| | - PER CITY CODE SECTION 94-485(Q)(1), A MINIMUM OF 4 |
| | BICYCLE PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED WITH 65 REQUIRED |
| | AUTOMOBILE PARKING SPACES. HOWEVER, NO BICYCLE PARKING |
| | SPACES ARE SHOWN. PLEASE REVISE. |
| | - CLARIFY HOW MANY HOTEL ROOMS ARE PROPOSED. SHEET |
| | A-0.00 INDICATES THERE ARE 148 ROOMS AND 78 SUITES, BUT |
| | SHEET A-1.00 AND THE TRAFFIC STUDY INDICATE THERE ARE |
| | 146 ROOMS AND 78 SUITES. |
| | - REDUCE THE WIDTH OF THE 2 DRIVEWAYS (WHICH IS |
| | CURRENTLY SHOWN AS 22 FEET WIDE) FOR THE PORTE COCHERE |
| | ON WEST RAILROAD AVENUE. |
| | - MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 10-FOOT SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF |
| | THE PORTE COCHERE PER CITY CODE SECTION 94-111 AND |
| | FIGURE IV-22. CONSIDER PROVIDING A MINIMUM OF 10-FOOT |
| | SIDE WALK ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE TO MATCH THE |
| | SIDEWALK WIDTH REQUIREMENT OF THE PORTE COCHERE. |
| | - SOME OF THE PARKING SPACES AT THE CORNERS ON THE |
| | GROUND FLOOR AND MEZZANINE LEVELS ARE STRIPED OUT BUT |
| | WITH PARKING CURB STOPS. CLARIFY IF THOSE ARE INTENDED |
| | AS TURNAROUND AREA OR PARKING SPACES. |
| | - ALIGN THE CURB RAMP CROSSING 4TH STREET NEAR WEST |
| | RAILROAD AVENUE WITH THE RAMP ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE. |
| | - SHOW CROSSWALK CONNECTIONS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE |
| | STREETS. |
| | - THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF COMMENTS RELATING TO |
| | CURB RAMP, CROSSWALK, STOP BAR AND PARALLEL PARKING |
| | LOCATIONS. A SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN, |
| | PREPARED, SIGNED AND SEALED BY A P.E., MUST BE PROVIDED |
| | IN ORDER FOR US TO REVIEW THE SITE PLAN. |
| | - PLEASE RESURFACE THE ROADWAY AND INTERSECTION ALONG |
| | THE ENTIRE PROPERTY FRONTAGE INSTEAD OF THE SECTIONS |
| | WITH DRAINAGE WORK. |
| | ROSEMARY RESIDENTIAL (Z16020014) |
| | - CLARIFY HOW MANY BICYCLE PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED |
| | WITH THE 2 BIKE RACKS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. PER CITY |
| | CODE SECTION 94-111(I)(2), A MINIMUM OF 10 BICYCLE |
| | PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED WITH 144 REQUIRED PARKING |
| | SPACES, AND THESE BICYCLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED IN A SECURED AREA. |
| | - A CURB RAMP IS PROPOSED FACING ROSEMARY AVENUE NEAR |
| | 4TH STREET. PLEASE PROVIDE A CROSSWALK AND A CURB RAMP |
| | ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE. |
| | - A CURB RAMP IS PROPOSED FACING WEST RAILROAD AVENUE |
| | NEAR 4TH STREET. PLEASE CONSIDER RELOCATING THIS CURB |
| | RAMP TO THE INDIGO HOTEL PROPERTY TO ALIGN WITH THE |
| | CURB RAMP ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE. |
| | - SHOW CROSSWALK CONNECTIONS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE |
| | STREETS. |
| | - THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF COMMENTS RELATING TO |
| | CURB RAMP, CROSSWALK, STOP BAR AND PARALLEL PARKING |
| | LOCATIONS. A SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN, |
| | PREPARED, SIGNED AND SEALED BY A P.E., MUST BE PROVIDED |
| | IN ORDER FOR US TO REVIEW THE SITE PLAN. |
| | - PLEASE RESURFACE THE ROADWAY AND INTERSECTION ALONG |
| | THE ENTIRE PROPERTY FRONTAGE INSTEAD OF THE SECTIONS |
| | WITH DRAINAGE WORK. |
| | - PROVIDE FLUSH SECTION ON ROSEMARY AVENUE TO ALIGN |
| | WITH CITY?S FUTURE PLAN. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH |
| | ENGINEERING ON THE DESIGN. |
| | |
| | ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E. |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| |
Print |
