| Date |
Text |
| 2016-03-07 15:30:53 | 1. SITE IS WIHTIN A HISTORIC DISTRICT AND AS SUCH |
| | APPROVAL FROM THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD IS |
| | REQUIRED. IN ADDITION, AND DUE TO PROPOSED UTILIZATION |
| | OF THE TDR INCENTIVE PROGRAM, THE SITE REQUIRED |
| | APPROVAL FROM THE DOWNTOWN ACTION COMMITTEE (SPECIAL |
| | REVIEW STANDARDS). |
| | 2. SETBACK ON ROSEMARY AVENUE SHALL BE MEASURED FROM |
| | THE BACK OF THE PLANTER CURB. |
| | 3. PAVERS ON ROSEMARY AVENUE SHALL MATCH EXISTING |
| | PAVERS IN COLOR, PATTERN, TEXTURE ETC. |
| | 4. FIRST FLOOR ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE COMPLIES WITH THE |
| | MINIMUM 228.8? RETAIL REQUIREMENT. HOWEVER, STAFF |
| | RECOMMENDS THE RELOCATION OF THE FITNESS CENTER AND THE |
| | USE OF THE PROMINENT CORNER SPACE FOR THE LOBBY |
| | ENTRANCE OR COMMERCIAL SPACE (OFFICES ALLOWED- RETAIL |
| | ALLOWED BUT NOT REQUIRED). |
| | 5. PLEASE INDICATE HOW IS THE GARBAGE PICK-UP OPERATION |
| | (CIRCULATION, STAGING, PRIVATE OR PUBLIC). |
| | 6. PLEASE INDICATE THE PARKING RAMP PROPOSED SLOPE (SEC |
| | 94-111 (Q)(2) ? NON-PARKING RAMP SLOPE HIGHER THAN 14% |
| | REQUIRES A BREAK-OVER TRANSITION). |
| | 7. DEAD-END PARKING REQUIRES A TURN-AROUND SPACE. |
| | 8. FACADES AND RENDERING FACING NORTH ARE NOT |
| | CONSISTENT WITH FLOOR PLANS (CANTILEVER CONDITION AND |
| | STEP BACK CONDITIONS) |
| | 9. DATURA ELEVATION DOES NOT SHOW THE GARAGE ENTRANCE. |
| | 10. ALONG CLEMATIS STREET A 56? CONDITIONAL SETBACK IS |
| | REQUIRED ABOVE THE 2ND FLOOR. PROPOSAL SEEMS TO BE AT |
| | 52? ONLY. PLEASE INCLUDE DIMENSION FROM THE BACK OF THE |
| | EXISTING CURB. |
| | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE AUTO TURN FOR THE LOADING AREAS. |
| | 12. SITE PLAN SHOWS THE ALLEY OPENING (WALL TO WALL) TO |
| | BE AROUND 26? WHILE ELEVATION SHOWS THE ALLEY OPENING |
| | AT 34? IN WIDTH. |
| | 13. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE PLANAR BREAK REGULATIONS, AND TRANSPARENCY. |
| | 14. THE SETBACK REQUIRED ABOVE THE 2ND STORY, AND |
| | PROVIDED IN THIS PROJECT ABOVE THE 1ST STORY SHALL BE |
| | DESIGNED AS A TERRACE (20% OF THE CWD-CD SITE). |
| | 15. PLEASE DOCUMENT ALL THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE |
| | ADJACENT PROPERTY ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE SUBJECT |
| | PARCEL, AND IDENTIFY ANY POSSIBLE CONFLICTS AND |
| | IMPACTS. |
| | 16. PROPOSAL TO EXPAND THE BUILDING OVER THE ALLEY |
| | SHALL BE DISCUSSED FURTHER. INITIAL OPTIONS ARE 1. |
| | ABANDONING THE ALLEY BUT REQUIRE AN ACCESS AND UTILITY |
| | EASEMENT; OR 2. AIR RIGHT EASEMENT AND UNDERGROUND |
| | EASEMENT. |
| | 17. PLEASE INDICATE THE CONDITIONS OF THE SIDEWALK ON |
| | DATURA STREET EAST OF THE PROJECT AND HOW IT WILL |
| | TRANSITION TO THE NEW HARDSCAPE. |
| | 18. PLEASE INDICATE IF ANY ON-STREET PARKING IS GOING |
| | TO BE REMOVED. |
| | |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON SUBMITTAL PACKAGE: |
| | 19. DATA ON SURVEY SHOWS TOTAL PARCEL AREA AS 43,584 OR |
| | 1.23 ACRE. PLEASE CORRECT NUMBER AND PROVIDE SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGE FOR THE GROUP OF PROPERTIES DESIGNATED CWD-CD |
| | AND CWD-10 SEPARATELY. SURVEY SHALL INCLUDE |
| | MEASUREMENTS OF THE EXISTING SIDEWALKS, AND ROW |
| | INCLUDING SIDEWALK ACROSS THE STREET. |
| | |
| | 20. PLEASE ADJUST THE LOT SIZE AREAS TO BE CONSISTENT |
| | IN ALL THE DRAWINGS BASED ON THE SURVEY INFORMATION. |
| | 21. PLEASE INCLUDE PROPERTY LINES AND SETBACK LINES IN |
| | ALL FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS. |
| | 22. SHEET A1.02 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE ACCURATE (ACCESS |
| | RAMP NOT SHOWN). |
| | 23. RENDERING IN SHEET R0-02 IS NOT ACCURATE IN THE |
| | PLACEMENT OF THE SURROUNDING BUILDINGS. ALL RENDERINGS |
| | SHALL ACCURATELY REFLECT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS OF THE |
| | SURROUNDING AREA. |
| | 24. PLEASE INCLUDE NORTH AND EAST COLORED ELEVATIONS. |
| | PLEASE INDICATE SCALE ON ALL ELEVATIONS. |
| | 25. FOR THE DAC SPECIAL REVIEW FLOOR PLANS AND |
| | ELEVATIONS SHALL BE MORE DETAILED INDICATING LOCATION |
| | OF WINDOWS, BUILDING ENTRANCES AND BALCONIES. FACADE |
| | SHALL INCLUDE A CALL OUT FOR PROPOSED MATERIALS AND |
| | IMAGES OF THE PROPOSED MATERIALS. A MATERIAL BOARD WILL |
| | BE REQUIRED FOR THE HEARING. |
| | 26. FOR DAC, COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIAL REVIEW STANDARDS |
| | SHALL BE DEMONSTRATED. |
| | 27. PLEASE PROVIDE ELECTRONIC DRAWINGS (DXF OR CADD) TO |
| | ALLOW THE MEASUREMENT OF THE FAR AREA INDICATED IN |
| | SHEET A0.06. |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM CITY'S HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER: |
| | AFTER PRELIMINARILY REVIEWING THE PROPOSED PROJECT I |
| | OFFER THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. ADDITION/NEW CONSTRUCTION IN HISTORIC DISTRICT |
| | REQUIRES APPROVAL BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD. |
| | 2. PLANS ARE NOT DETAILED ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND |
| | REHABILITATION EFFORTS ON EXISTING HISTORIC STRUCTURES, |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE CLARIFICATION. |
| | 3. PROPOSED ADDITION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SECTION |
| | 94-49, SPECIFICALLY; |
| | SETTING, ORIENTATION AND SETBACKS IS NOT COMPATIBLE |
| | WITH DISTRICT UTILIZING INVERSE STEPPING OF BUILDING AS |
| | PROPOSED |
| | PROPORTION OF OPENINGS ARE NOT VISUALLY COMPATIBLE WITH |
| | SURROUNDING BUILDINGS |
| | RHYTHM OF SOLIDS TO VOIDS IS NOT VISUALLY COMPATIBLE |
| | AND |
| | THE SIZE, SCALE, MASS AND VOLUME OVERWHELMS THE |
| | EXISTING STRUCTURES. |
| | 2. DETAILED PLANS OF SHORING/SUPPORT SHALL BE SUBMITTED |
| | PRIOR TO PERMITTING TO ENSURE NO DAMAGE OCCURS |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
