| Date |
Text |
| 2016-03-08 15:51:54 | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT |
| | |
| | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL |
| | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION |
| | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE |
| | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT |
| | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE |
| | PLAN APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 1. PLEASE SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR THE PEAK POTABLE WATER |
| | DEMAND, SANITARY SEWER FLOW, AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION |
| | YARDAGE. |
| | |
| | 2. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | NON-STANDARD ELEMENTS (TREES AND TREE GRATES; PAVERS, |
| | ETC.) PROPOSED WITHIN CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| | |
| | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATING |
| | THE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION VEHICLE CAN ACCESS THE |
| | PROPOSED DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR LOCATIONS. THE TRASH |
| | DUMPSTER/COMPACTORS MUST LOCATED IN AREAS EASILY |
| | SERVICED BY THE CITY SANITATION EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER |
| | PER SECTION 74-35(A)(5) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. IF A |
| | ROLL-OFF COMPACTOR IS PROPOSED, PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER |
| | FROM THE PRIVATE PROVIDER VERIFYING THAT THEY CAN |
| | PROVIDE SERVICE WITH THE CONFIGURATION SHOWN ON THE |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | 4. DETAILS SHEETS WILL NEED TO UTILIZE STANDARD CITY OF |
| | WEST PALM BEACH DETAILS, WHICH MAY BE DOWNLOADED AT |
| | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ |
| | |
| | 5. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE |
| | AVAILABLE AT HTTP://WWW.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/NEWSROOM/08 |
| | 14/08-26-14-FLOOD_MAPS.HTM. PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND |
| | VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED |
| | PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 6. PLEASE SHOW THE SIGHT TRIANGLES ON THE GROUND FLOOR |
| | LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR THE INTERSECTIONS AND VEHICULAR |
| | EXITS. (SECTION 94-305E, CODE OF ORDINANCES) |
| | |
| | 7. A TRAFFIC STUDY WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT |
| | SHOWING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL AFFECT THE |
| | TRAFFIC VOLUME AND SURROUNDING LOCAL ROADWAYS. INCLUDE |
| | TRAFFIC ACCIDENT DATA FOR AFFECTED STREET CORRIDORS. |
| | ESTIMATE INCREASED OR DECREASED POTENTIAL. SAFETY |
| | IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE RECOMMENDED WHERE NECESSARY. |
| | PLEASE SCHEDULE A MEETING WITH THE CITY TRAFFIC |
| | ENGINEER (BRIAN COLLINS) TO DETERMINE THE SCOPE OF THE |
| | REQUIRED STUDY. |
| | |
| | 8. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATIONS |
| | OF ALL WATER METERS, VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, LIGHT POLES, |
| | ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY BE REQUIRED WHERE PLANTINGS ARE |
| | NEAR UNDERGROUND STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR POTABLE WATER |
| | LINES. |
| | |
| | 9. THE AVAILABLE WATER PRESSURE IN THIS PORTION OF THE |
| | CITY MAY NOT BE ACCEPTABLE AT ELEVATIONS HIGHER THAN |
| | THE 2ND FLOOR. WE RECOMMEND A LONG-TERM PRESSURE STUDY |
| | BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO FINALIZATION OF THE UTILITY |
| | DESIGN. |
| | |
| | 10. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH THE CITY ENGINEERING STAFF |
| | FOR THE PROPOSED UTILITY TIE IN LOCATIONS. THE AGE AND |
| | CONDITION OF THE EXISTING PIPES MAY NOT BE ADEQUATE FOR |
| | THE PROPOSED CONNECTIONS. THE SUBMITTED DRAWINGS ARE |
| | NOT CONSISTENT WITH PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS WITH CITY |
| | STAFF. |
| | |
| | 11. PLEASE CLARIFY THE SIZE OF THE EXISTING WATER MAIN. |
| | IT IS SHOWN AS A 10? EXISTING MAIN, BUT A 12? X 8? |
| | TAPPING SLEEVE. THE MAIN NORTH OF THE DRIVEWAY IS SHOWN |
| | AS A 12?, BUT AS A 10? MAIN AT THE PROPOSED CONNECTION |
| | LOCATION. |
| | |
| | 12. PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ROOF DRAINS AND |
| | INDICATE WHERE THE DISCHARGE WILL BE DIRECTED. RUNOFF |
| | VELOCITY AND VOLUME SHOULD NOT EXCEED EXISTING |
| | CONDITIONS. |
| | |
| | 13. INDICATE MILLING AND RESURFACING LIMITS AROUND |
| | TRENCH CUTS ON CITY STREETS. PAVERS WITHIN THE ROSEMARY |
| | RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL NEED TO BE RESTORED. |
| | |
| | 14. A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY ALONG DATURA WILL BE |
| | DEDICATED TO THE CITY. |
| | |
| | 15. PROPOSED WATER MAIN IN THE ALLEY APPEARS TO BE IN |
| | CONFLICT WITH AN EXISTING GAS MAIN. |
| | |
| | 16. THE SFWMD EXFILTRATION TRENCH EQUATION IS NOT |
| | APPLICABLE FOR THE DESIGN CONDITIONS OF THE TRENCH |
| | LAYOUT. |
| | |
| | 17. EACH BUILDING SHOULD HAVE ITS PROPORTIONATE SHARE |
| | OF STORM WATER TREATMENT AND PEAK FLOW ATTENUATION. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ROOF DRAINS AND |
| | INDICATE WHERE THE DISCHARGE WILL BE DIRECTED. RUNOFF |
| | VELOCITY AND VOLUME SHOULD NOT EXCEED EXISTING |
| | CONDITIONS. |
| | |
| | 18. DRAINAGE PLANS SHOW 18? HDPE AND RCP PIPES. BAFFLE |
| | DETAIL ON SHEET 03 SHOWS 15? HDPE. PLEASE REVISE SO |
| | THEY ARE CONSISTENT. |
| | |
| | 19. THE EXISTING DRAINAGE CATCH BASIN MAY NEED TO BE |
| | REHABILITATED OR REPLACED RATHER THAN CORED AS SHOWN ON |
| | SHEET 02 OF 5. |
| | |
| | 20. VERIFY DRIVE AISLE IS MINIMUM 24 FEET WIDE FOR THE |
| | SOUTH BUILDING GROUND FLOOR PARKING LOT OFF OF THE |
| | ALLEY |
| | |
| | 21. TURN AROUND SPACES MUST BE PROVIDED AT THE DEAD |
| | ENDS. REVISE THE PARKING LAYOUT TO COMPLY WITH SECTION |
| | 94-485 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. |
| | |
| | 22. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWING THE |
| | DELIVERY TRUCKS WILL BE ABLE TO UTILIZE THE SHOWING |
| | LOADING AREAS. |
| | |
| | 23. THERE IS NOT AN EXISTING BUILDING EAST OF THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ALONG DATURA. ONLY THE FPL |
| | SUBSTATION. |
| | |
| | 24. AN AGREEMENT FOR AERIAL AND SUBSURFACE |
| | ENCROACHMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 25. NEW WATER MAIN MAY NEED TO BE EXTENDED EASTWARD. |
| | PROVIDE RESULTS OF MEETING WITH CITY |
| | OPERATIONS/MAINTENANCE STAFF REGARDING CONDITION OF |
| | EXISTING POTABLE WATER AND SANITARY FACILITIES. |
| | PORTIONS OF THE EXISTING LINES MAY NEED TO BE SLEEVED |
| | OR ENCASED. |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO |
| | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING |
| | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL |
| | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC |
| | WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL |
| | APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT |
| | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ |
| | |
| | 2. SOLID WASTE YARDAGE WILL NEED TO BE VERIFIED AS PART |
| | OF THE FINAL DESIGN TO VERIFY THAT THE DESIGN INCLUDES |
| | APPROPRIATE NUMBER AND SIZE OF TRASH BINS. |
| | |
| | 3. A SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO THE |
| | ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR |
| | REPLAT APPROVAL. PLEASE CONTACT VINCE NOEL AT |
| | [email protected] TO GET A COPY OF THE PLAT APPLICATION. |
| | FINAL PLAT APPROVAL WILL BE BASED ON THE APPROVED SITE |
| | PLAN. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | KELLY CRANFORD, P.E. |
| | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN MANAGER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-494-1098 (OFFICE) |
| | |
| | VINCE NOEL, PSM |
| | CITY SURVEYOR / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-494-1096 |
| | |
| | TRACY WARD, PE |
| | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1120 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
