| Date |
Text |
| 2016-05-26 14:29:17 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) REPEAT COMMENT FROM 2/5/16 AND 5/13/16: PROVIDE |
| | LETTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC UTILITIES CONFIRMING |
| | THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR |
| | EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISION OF |
| | THEIR SERVICES: FPU AND FPL. LETTERS FROM FPU AND FPL |
| | HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED TO STAFF. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE |
| | UTILITY LETTERS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 2.) ALL FINAL PLANS SHALL BE SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED |
| | BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED ARCHITECT/LANDSCAPE |
| | ARCHITECT/ENGINEER. |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN: |
| | |
| | 1.) PROPOSED LIGHT POLE FIXTURES AT THE SOUTH EAST |
| | PARKING LOT IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE PARKING SPACES. DUE |
| | TO THE BUMP OUT TO ACCOMMODATE THE TWO (2) LIGHT |
| | FIXTURES ON THE LOT, WHICH IMPACTS FOUR (4) PARKING |
| | STALLS, THE STALLS DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT |
| | FOR PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS. PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 2.) WHY ARE THE PROPOSED LIGHT FIXTURES AT THE |
| | SOUTHWEST PARKING LOT LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 19 FT. FROM |
| | THE PARKING STALLS? THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING THE |
| | FIXTURES IS TO PROVIDE LIGHTING TO THE PARKING LOT. |
| | THIS DOES NOT SEEM LOGICAL. PLEASE ADDRESS AND/OR |
| | PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION. |
| | |
| | ACHITECTURAL FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS: |
| | |
| | 1.) THE REVISED FLOOR PLANS/ELEVATIONS SEEM TO BE |
| | MISSING FROM THE RESUBMITTAL PACKET. PLEASE INCLUDE |
| | REVISED STAMPED AND SEALED FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS |
| | IN THE RESUBMITTAL PACKET. ENSURE THAT THE FLOOR PLAN, |
| | ELEVATIONS AND SITE PLAN ARE ALL CONSISTENT. |
| | |
| | LIGHTING: |
| | |
| | 1.) PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHOWING THE LOCATION OF |
| | ALL LIGHT FIXTURES PROPOSED IN THE PROJECT. LIGHT POLES |
| | SHALL BE SETBACK AT LEAST 5 FT. FROM THE PROPERTY |
| | LINES. PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE LOCATION OF ANY LIGHT |
| | POLE FIXTURE WILL NOT BE IN CONFLICT WITH ANY EXISTING |
| | UTILITIES AND/OR PROPOSED LANDSCAPING. [ACCORDING TO |
| | THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSE LETTER TO ZONING'S COMMENTS, |
| | DATED 5/25/16, THE APPLICANT IS WORKING ON REVISING THE |
| | PHOTOMETRIC PLAN TO COMPLY WITH ZONING CODE |
| | REQUIREMENTS.] |
| | |
| | NOTES: |
| | |
| | * A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO |
| | THE REMOVAL OF ANY TREES ON THE PROJECT SITE. |
| | |
| | * AN EMAIL FROM JON SCHMIDT TO STEVE ANDERSON OF PALM |
| | TRAN, DATED APRIL 20, 2016, WAS PROVIDED AS PART OF THE |
| | RESUBMITTAL PACKET. THE LETTER INDICATES THAT THERE WAS |
| | A DISCUSSION ON RELOCATION OF SOUTHBOUND PALM TRAN BUS |
| | STOP #114 TO THE NEXT BLOCK TO THE SOUTH. STAFF WILL |
| | NEED CONFIRMATION FROM STEVE ANDERSON OF PALM TRAN |
| | CONFIRMING THE COORDINATION PRIOR TO THE RELOCATION OF |
| | THE BUS STOP. PLEASE PROVIDE THIS DOCUMENTATION UPON |
| | RECEIPT. |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * ANY REVISIONS TO THE PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWELVE |
| | (12) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 INCHES X |
| | 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND |
| | AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT |
| | CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE |
| | ($200). |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE |
| | QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
