| Date |
Text |
| 2015-12-08 13:09:15 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) A UNITY OF TITLE COMBINING THE THREE PARCELS IS |
| | REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT. PLEASE CONTACT THE |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR INFORMATION ON THE |
| | PROCESS (561) 494-1040. |
| | |
| | 2.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION FROM THE FOLLOWING |
| | PUBLIC UTILITIES THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT |
| | ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE |
| | WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPU, FPL |
| | AND COMCAST. |
| | |
| | 3.) THE DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO SCALE AND CANNOT BE |
| | MEASURED. |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) THE PROPOSED MAXIMUM SETBACK OF 37.3 FT. ON |
| | ROSEMARY AVENUE EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SETBACK |
| | OF 30 FT. PERMITTED ON ROSEMARY AVENUE PER ZLDR |
| | S.94-128, TABLE IV-36. PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 2.) PROVIDE A TRAFFIC LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS CONFIRMING |
| | THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT MEETS THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE |
| | STANDARDS (TPS) OF THE COUNTY. |
| | |
| | 3.) PURSUANT TO ZLDR S.94-109, "ACTIVE USE" IS DEFINED |
| | AS A USE THAT IS VISIBLE TO THE ADJACENT STREETS, |
| | ATTRACTS PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY AND PROVIDES ACCESS TO THE |
| | GENERAL PUBLIC. THE CURRENT PLANS SEEM TO MASK THE |
| | GROUND FLOOR USE. A PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN ACCESS POINT |
| | FROM THE SIDEWALK TO THE CORNER OF THE BUILDING OR |
| | DIRECTLY TO A FRONT ENTRANCE ON ROSEMARY AVENUE SHOULD |
| | BE ADDED TO ENGAGE THE BUILDING WITH THE STREET AND TO |
| | PROVIDE BETTER ACCESS FOR PEDESTRIANS. |
| | |
| | 4.) PURSUANT TO ZLDR S.94-128, TABLE IV-6, THE MINIMUM |
| | PERCENTAGE OF GROUND FLOOR ACTIVE USE ALONG 2ND STREET |
| | IS 30 PERCENT. THE PROJECT DOES NOT SEEM TO MEET THIS |
| | MINIMUM REQUIREMENT; ACCESS INTO THE COVERED |
| | PARKING/PASSENGER PICKUP AND DROP OFF AREA IS NOT |
| | CONSIDERED AN ACTIVE USE. EXPANDING THE LOBBY AREA |
| | FURTHER INTO THE CORNER OF ROSEMARY AND 2ND AVENUE WILL |
| | HELP THE PROJECT MEET THE MINIMUM ACTIVE USE |
| | REQUIREMENT ALONG 2ND STREET AND SETBACK REQUIREMENT ON |
| | ROSEMARY AVENUE. |
| | |
| | 5.) THE MINIMUM TRANSPARENCY FOR ACTIVE USES ON THE |
| | GROUND FLOOR LEVEL ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE IS 50 PERCENT. |
| | THE CURRENT PLANS AND ELEVATIONS DO NOT SEEM TO MEET |
| | THIS REQUIREMENT. THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING AND |
| | ARCHITECTURAL PANELING SEEMS TO MASK THE TRANSPARENCY |
| | OF THE GROUND FLOOR ACTIVE USE, WHICH DOES NOT SATISFY |
| | THE INTENT OF THE ZLDR. [ZLDR S.94-128, TABLE IV-36] |
| | |
| | 6.) THE PLANS INDICATE THAT THERE IS ONLY GROUND LEVEL |
| | PARKING. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF HAVING A CAR LIFT AS |
| | DEPICTED IN SHEET A4.01? |
| | |
| | 7.) THE COVERED PARKING SHOWS A TWO-WAY DRIVE AISLE |
| | WIDTH OF 23 FT. THE ZLDR REQUIRES A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 24 |
| | FT. PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 8.) HOW WIDE IS THE TERMINUS AT THE END OF THE DRIVE |
| | AISLE? A MINIMUM 3 FT. WIDE BACK UP AREA SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED AT THE TERMINUS OF ANY DEAD-END DRIVE AISLE TO |
| | ALLOW FOR VEHICLES TO SAFELY PULL OUT OF THE END |
| | PARKING SPACES. IN ADDITION, THE EQUIVALENT OF ONE (1) |
| | PARKING SPACE AT THE TERMINUS OF THE DEAD END AISLE |
| | SHALL BE STRIPED AS A DEDICATED PULL-IN AREA FOR |
| | TURNING AROUND. [ZLDR S.94-111(C)(2)] |
| | |
| | 9.) IT IS UNCLEAR TO HOW TRASH WILL BE STORED AND |
| | COLLECTED FOR THE PROJECT; THE PROPOSED TRASH ROOM AND |
| | BINS SEEMS RATHER SMALL FOR A 20 ROOM HOTEL. |
| | |
| | 10.) INCREASE THE SIDEWALK WIDTH TO 5 FT. ON 2ND STREET |
| | AND 8 FT. ON ROSEMARY AVENUE. THE WIDER SIDEWALK WIDTH |
| | WILL IMPROVE THE SAFETY OF PEDESTRIANS WALKING ALONG |
| | THESE STREETS. |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) ELEVATIONS DO NOT MATCH THE PLANS. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 2.) BLANK WALLS VISIBLE BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC FROM |
| | ADJACENT STREETS AND PUBLIC AREAS ARE PROHIBITED. |
| | ADDITIONAL FACADE ARTICULATION ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH |
| | FACADES ARE REQUIRED IN ORDER TO BREAK UP THE BLANK |
| | WALLS ON THESE FACADES. [ZLDR S.94-109] |
| | |
| | |
| | LANDSCAPING AND STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN. ALL BUILDINGS SHALL |
| | PROVIDE EXTERIOR LIGHTING EVERY NIGHT FROM DUSK TO DAWN |
| | TO ILLUMINATE BUILDING ENTRANCES, SIDEWALKS AND PATHS, |
| | AT A MINIMUM OF 0.6 FOOT CANDLES AS MEASURED AT THE |
| | BACK EDGE OF THE CURB AND ONE FOOT ABOVE THE SIDEWALK. |
| | THIS MEASUREMENT SHALL INCLUDE LIGHT EMANATING FROM |
| | PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SOURCES. UNSHIELDED LIGHT FIXTURES |
| | SHALL BE PROHIBITED. [ZLDR S.94-113(B)] |
| | |
| | 2.) SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES SHALL BE MEASURED FROM |
| | THE BACK OF THE CURB. [ZLDR S.94-113(C)] |
| | |
| | |
| | SIGNAGE: |
| | 1.) THE MONUMENT SIGN IS PROHIBITED. PLEASE REMOVE FROM |
| | THE PLANS. [ZLDR S.94-110(B)(3)] |
| | |
| | 2.) ONE (1) BUILDING IDENTITY SIGN SHALL BE ALLOWED ON |
| | THE BUILDING (NOT TWO (2) AS PROVIDED IN THE PLANS). |
| | SUCH SIGN SHALL NOT BE INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED AND SHALL |
| | NOT EXCEED A TOTAL SIGN FACE OF 40 SQ. FT. EXTERIOR |
| | ILLUMINATION IS PERMITTED. [ZLDR S.94-110(D)(3)] |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF |
| | SIXTEEN (16) PAPER COPIES AND ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN |
| | 8.5 INCHES X 11 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL |
| | PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED |
| | PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20 PERCENT ($300.00) OF THE ORIGINAL |
| | APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE |
| | QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
