| Date |
Text |
| 2015-12-08 10:14:56 | CASE NO. PB 1222N |
| | BRAMAN MOTORCARS CPD - SERVICE BAY AMENDMENT |
| | 2901 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN |
| | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON MONDAY, |
| | DECEMBER 14, 2015, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR |
| | THE JANUARY 20, 2016 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM |
| | THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY JANUARY 30, 2016), THE |
| | CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION |
| | SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS WERE NOT |
| | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED; THEREFORE, THE APPLICANT WILL |
| | BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL IS 20% OF |
| | THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 1) NEW COMMENT: THE REVISED DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES ALONG |
| | EXCHANGE COURT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY?S |
| | ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FOR TECHNICAL FUNCTIONALITY. |
| | |
| | 2) REPEAT COMMENT: DEMONSTRATE HOW A TRUCK WOULD ACCESS |
| | THE RELOCATED 10 FOOT X 50 FOOT LOADING SPACE ON THE |
| | FIRST LEVEL OF THE PARKING GARAGE. THE NARRATIVE OF HOW |
| | A TRUCK ACCESSES THIS SPACE DOES NOT DEMONSTRATE HOW |
| | THE TRUCK WOULD ACCESS THE SPACE. THE TURN IN FROM |
| | OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AND IMMEDIATE TURN AGAIN DOWN THE |
| | DRIVE AISLE VISUALLY LOOK TO SEVERE FOR A BIG DELIVERY |
| | TRUCK TO NEGOTIATE. THE ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLANS DO |
| | NOT SHOW A LOADING SPACE AT THE SAME LOCATION AS THE |
| | SITE PLAN. BOTH PLANS SHOW NUMEROUS CONFLICTING LINES |
| | (CURB LINES?) WHICH WOULD MAKE IT DIFFICULT IF NOT |
| | IMPOSSIBLE TO ACCESS THE SPACE. THE PLANS SHALL ALL |
| | MATCH AND VERIFY THAT THIS IS A USABLE LOADING SPACE OR |
| | AN ALTERNATE SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE SITE. |
| | |
| | 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THE RELOCATED BICYCLE PAD WITH RACKS |
| | DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE LOCATIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | SECTION 94-485(Q)2. THE BICYCLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE |
| | ACCESSIBLE WITHOUT REQUIRING THE USER TO TRAVERSE A |
| | LANDSCAPE AREA (IN THIS CASE SOD) OR TO NEGOTIATE |
| | BETWEEN PARKED CARS IF THE PARKING SPACES ARE IN USE. |
| | THERE IS AN AREA IN FRONT OF BUILDING E THAT COULD |
| | EASILY FIT THE BICYCLE PARKING. |
| | |
| | 4) REVISED COMMENT: PLEASE VERIFY THAT THE HEIGHT OF |
| | THE NEW GARAGE IS 77 FEET 9 INCHES. THIS HEIGHT SHALL |
| | BE INCLUDED IN THE SITE DATA TABLE. WHILE THIS IS TWO |
| | (2) FEET TALLER THAN THE ORIGINALLY APPROVED GARAGE, |
| | BASED ON THE METHOD OF HEIGHT/SETBACK MEASUREMENT IN |
| | THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THERE IS |
| | ACTUALLY NO INCREASE IN THE REQUIRED EAST SIDE SETBACK. |
| | PLEASE USE THE SAME WAIVER VALUES OF 13.5 FEET FOR THE |
| | BUILDING AND 22 FEET FOR THE BUILDING OVERHANG IN THE |
| | WAIVER AS SHOWN ON THE CURRENTLY APPROVED SITE PLAN. |
| | THERE IS NO NEED TO UPDATE THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. |
| | |
| | 5) REVISED COMMENT: THE NEW PORSCHE SERVICE BAY |
| | CONFIGURATION APPEARS TO HAVE 18 SERVICE BAYS, NOT 17 |
| | AS LISTED. THE AREAS THAT ARE NOT FOR SERVICE USE SHALL |
| | BE MARKED ON THE SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. IF THE |
| | SPACE IS NOT MARKED AS SOMETHING OTHER THAN SERVICE, |
| | THEN IT WILL RESULT IN ONE EXTRA REQUIRED PARKING SPACE |
| | ON THE SITE. |
| | |
| | 6) REPEAT COMMENT: THE TOTAL INTERIOR SPACE COUNTED FOR |
| | PARKING IS 120,390 SQUARE FEET, WHICH AT 1 PARKING |
| | SPACE PER 500 SQUARE FEET REQUIRES 241 PARKING SPACES, |
| | NOT 240 AS LISTED. THE SERVICE PARTS/STORAGE AREAS ARE |
| | COVERED BY THE 1ST LEVEL OF THE GARAGE. THESE TWO AREAS |
| | ARE COVERED AND NOT OPEN TO THE SKY; THEREFORE, THEY |
| | SHALL BE COUNTED TOWARDS MEETING THE ENCLOSED AREA |
| | PARKING REQUIREMENTS. THIS SHALL BE ALL UNDER ONE LINE |
| | ITEM ON THE PARKING TABLE, NOT TWO AS SHOWN ON THE |
| | REVISED PLANS. |
| | |
| | 7) NEW COMMENT: THERE ARE 537, NOT 534 PARKING SPACES |
| | PROVIDED. PLEASE UPDATE THE TABLE. |
| | |
| | 8) REPEAT COMMENT: THERE ARE SOME INCONSISTENT CURB |
| | LINES WITHIN THE DRIVEWAY BETWEEN BUILDINGS D AND E ON |
| | THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN. (SEE ZONING COMMENT NO. |
| | 2). |
| | |
| | 9) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PAVING AND DRAINAGE PLAN DOES |
| | NOT SHOW SAME DIMENSIONS AS THE SITE PLAN ON THE NORTH |
| | SIDE OF THE MINI BUILDING FOR THE DRIVE AISLE AND |
| | PARKING STALL DEPTH. |
| | |
| | 10) NEW COMMENT: PLEASE CLARIFY THE GATES ALONG |
| | EXCHANGE CT. STAFF WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT THESE |
| | WILL BE ROLLING GATES (DETAILS ON SITE PLAN INDICATE |
| | THIS); HOWEVER, THE LANDSCAPE PLANS CALL THEM OUT AS |
| | SWING GATES. IN EITHER CASE, THE GATES LOOK LIKE THEY |
| | WILL BE CONFLICTING WITH LANDSCAPE WHEN THEY ARE OPEN. |
| | NOTE THE SWING GATES WILL BLOCK THE DRIVE AISLES WHEN |
| | THEY ARE OPENED, SO ROLLING GATES SEEM TO BE A BETTER |
| | OPTION. |
| | |
| | 11) NEW COMMENT: THE CIVIL PLANS CALL OUT NEW LIGHT |
| | POLES NORTH OF THE NEW MINI SERVICE AREA. THESE ARE NOT |
| | CALLED OUT AS NEW ON THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE REMEMBER |
| | THAT ALL NEW LIGHT POLES SHALL BE SET BACK FIVE (5) |
| | FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. |
| | |
| | 12) REPEAT COMMENT (FROM PPRC MEETING): AT THE PPRC |
| | MEETING, THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MADE A COMMENT REGARDING |
| | FIRE EGRESS FROM THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING TO THE |
| | PUBLIC SIDEWALK NETWORK SO THAT PEOPLE WOULD NOT NEED |
| | TO WALK THROUGH A POTENTIAL HAZARD IN THE BUILDING TO |
| | GET OUT ON THE SOUTH SIDE. STAFF IS UNABLE TO LOCATE |
| | THIS ON THE PLANS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
