| Date |
Text |
| 2016-05-16 12:03:38 | COMMENTS 3RD REVIEW 5-16-2016 |
| | 1. SHEET A1.1A SHALL BE MODIFIED TO ACCURATELY INDICATE |
| | THE AREAS COUNTED AS FAR ACCORDING TO THE GROSS |
| | BUILDING AREA DEFINITION IN SEC 94-109 OF THE ZLDRS. |
| | HATCHED AREAS IN EACH FLOOR PLAN SHALL ONLY INCLUDE |
| | THOSE AREAS INCLUDED IN GBA. SUMMARY TABLE SHALL HAVE |
| | ALSO A SEPARATE COLUMN FOR MECHANICAL AND PARKING AREAS |
| | NOT INCLUDED IN GBA. |
| | 2. PARKING REQUIREMENT TABLE IN SHEET A1.1A SHALL BE |
| | ADJUSTED TO REFLECT THE CODE REQUIREMENT FOR DOWNTOWN |
| | (TABLE IV-9). |
| | 3. PLEASE REVISE THE PARKING LAYOUT TO CONFIRM |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM WIDTH OF PARKING SPACES IN |
| | THOSE CASES WHERE PARKING SPACE IS ADJACENT TO A COLUMN |
| | OR A WALL (94-111(C)(1). STRIPING SHALL COMPLY WITH |
| | CITY DETAIL. |
| | 4. EAST ELEVATION SHOWS WINDOWN IN THE SE ROOM BUT THEY |
| | ARE NOT SHOWN IN THE FLOOR PLANS. PLEASE CLARIFY AND |
| | CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH BLANK WALL REGULATIONS. |
| | 5. PLEASE INDICATE THE DEPTH OF THE ARCHITECTURAL |
| | FEATURES PROVIDED ON THE WALLS LESS THAN 3 FEET FROM |
| | THE PROPERTY LINE. |
| | 6. FENESTRATION SHALL BE PROVIDED ON ALL FACADES |
| | ENCLOSING ACTIVE USES (2ND FLOOR MANAGER ROOM). |
| | 7. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE PRELIMINARY LOCATION FOR |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENT |
| | (CONTACT SYBLLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES |
| | COORDINATOR AT 822-1515). |
| | 8. PLEASE TALK WITH TRACY WARD IN THE ENGINEERING |
| | DEPARTMENT TO MODIFY THE DESIGN OF THE EXFILTRATION |
| | TRENCH TO BE BELOW THE STRUCTURAL SOIL DEPTH (36") |
| | REQUIRED FOR STREET TREES ON TRINITY PLACE. |
| | 9. PLEASE REDUCE THE SEPARATION OF THE TWO TREES IN |
| | FRONT OF THE HOTEL ENTRANCE TO A MORE CONSISTENT |
| | SPACING MATCHING THE OTHER TREES AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE. |
| | WE RECOMMEND AROUND 35-40 FEET. |
| | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE A HARDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR DIXIE AND |
| | TRINITY. TRINITY PLACE SHALL MATCH THE EXISTING PATTERN |
| | ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. |
| | 12. SUBMITTED RENDERING ARE STILL NOT ACCURATELY |
| | REFLECTING THE EXISTING CONTEXT AND THE PROPOSED GROUND |
| | LEVEL CONDITIONS RESULTING FROM THE BUILDING. |
| | 13. PLEASE PROVIDE PICTURES OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING |
| | MATERIALS INCLUDING THE GARAGE SCREENING. |
| | |
| | 13. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN COMMENTS: |
| | A. THE REVISED DESIGN HAS INTRODUCED ADDITIONAL |
| | ARCHITECTURAL LANGUAGE TO THE BUILDING DESIGN RESULTING |
| | IN DIFFERENT TREATMENT FOR EACH ELEVATION, AND IN |
| | DETRIMENT OF A MORE CONSISTENT OVERALL BUILDING DESIGN. |
| | REVISIONS TO THE FACADE DESIGN SHALL BE INTRODUCED. |
| | B. THE REQUIRED PLANAR BREAK ALONG TRINITY PLACE SHALL |
| | BE USED ON THE HIERARCHICAL TREATMENT OF THE BUILDING |
| | ELEMENTS. THE PROPOSED PLANAR BREAK IS LOCATED WHERE |
| | THE BUILDING ENTRANCE IS, AND AS SUCH IT SHOULD REFLECT |
| | OR CREATE A SIGNIFICANT ACCENT ON THE FACADE. |
| | C. ENTRANCE CANOPY SHALL BE LOWERED TO CREATE A |
| | PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT AND SCALE. |
| | D. THE DIXIE HWAY FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION SHALL BE |
| | ADJUSTED TO REFLECT THE PROPOSED RESTAURANT AND |
| | HIGHLIGHT ITS ENTRANCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | COMMENTS 2ND REVIEW 1-20-2016: |
| | 1. SATISFIED - PLEASE EXTEND THE SPECIALTY TREATMENT OF |
| | THE SIDEWALK ACROSS THE SOUTH CURB CUT. SHEET A2.1 |
| | SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO REFLECT THE FLUSH CONDITION OF THE |
| | DRIVEWAY AS IT MEETS SIDEWALK. |
| | |
| | COMMENTS 1ST REVIEW 11-10-2015 |
| | 1. SATISFIED- 1. EXISTING BACK OF CURB ON TRINITY PLACE |
| | ALONG THE CITY PLAZA II BUILDING SHALL BE CONTINUED |
| | WEST AND ADJUSTED IN FRONT OF THE CANOPY HOTEL IF |
| | NECESSARY. NEW CURB CUT WILL BE THE NEW BACK OF CURB |
| | FOR THE PURPOSES OF MEASURING THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. |
| | 2. SATISFIED- 2. TRAVEL LANE WIDTH SHALL BE MAINTAINED |
| | CONSISTENT FROM OLIVE AVE TO DIXIE HWAY AND CURB SHALL |
| | BE ADJUSTED IF NECESSARY. |
| | 3. SATISFIED- 3. SETBACKS ARE MEASURED FROM BACK OF |
| | CURB (EXISTING CURB ON DIXIE HWAY, AND NEW CURB ON |
| | TRINITY PLACE). |
| | 4. SATISFIED- 4. DOORS SHALL NOT SWING OVER THE MINIMUM |
| | REQUIRED SETBACK. |
| | 5. UNDER REVIEW BY TE-5. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE PARKING |
| | OPERATION IS GOING TO FUNCTION. SOME CONCERNS ARE: |
| | - CARS WAITING FOR THE ELEVATOR SHALL NOT BE STACKED |
| | IN THE PUBLIC ROW. |
| | - HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE FOR THE ELEVATOR TO GO UP AND |
| | DOWN? |
| | - WHAT HAPPENS IF THE ELEVATOR BREAKS DOWN? |
| | 6. SATISFIED- DAC VARIANCE NOT NEEDED- 6. ACTIVE USES |
| | ARE REQUIRED ALONG 60% OF DIXIE HWAY ON ALL FLOORS UP |
| | TO 5TH STORY. PROJECT IS PROPOSEING PARKING USES ON |
| | FLOORS 3RD TO 5TH. |
| | 7. SATISFIED- DAC VARIANCE NOT NEEDED- 7. PARKING IS |
| | ALLOWED ABOVE THE 5TH STORY WITHOUT ACTIVE USES, BUT A |
| | CONDITIONAL SETBACK OF 31' IS REQUIRED. |
| | 8. SATISFIED- DAC VARIANCE NOT NEEDED- 8. PARKING IS |
| | ALLOWED ABOVE THE 5TH STORY WITHOUT ACTIVE USES, BUT A |
| | CONDITIONAL SETBACK OF 27? IS REQUIRED. |
| | 9. NOT SATISFIED- EAST ELEVATION IS A BLANK WALL NOT |
| | PERMITTED BY THE CURRENT CODE.FURTHER DISCUSSION IS |
| | NECESSARY ON THIS ITEM.HOW IS THE INDICATED PLANNAR |
| | BREAK ON GARAGE FACING TRINITY PLACE REFLECTED ON THE |
| | FACADE? - 9. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE FACADE ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS. |
| | PLEASE CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH FENESTRATION |
| | REQUIREMENTS AND COMPLIANCE WITH PROHIBITION FOR BLANK |
| | WALLS. |
| | 10. SATISFIED-FURTHER DISCUSSION ON OPERATION |
| | NECESSARY. - 10. PROPOSED HOTEL IS NOT PROVIDING ANY |
| | LOADING AREA. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE HOTEL IS GOING TO |
| | BE SERVICED WITHOUT A DEDICATED LOADING AREA. TRINITY |
| | PLACE IS A SINGLE LANE ROAD AND IT CANNOT BE BLOCK AT |
| | ANY TIME. |
| | 11. SATISFIED-FURTHER DISCUSSION NECESSARY- 11. HOW IS |
| | THE PROJECT PROPOSING TO HANDLE GARBAGE COLLECTION? |
| | 12. EAST ELEVATION SHOWN SOME ADDITIONAL WINDOWS ON THE |
| | SE ROOMS. PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT TYPE OF OPENING ARE |
| | PROPOSED AND INDICATE THEM IN THE FLOOR PLANS. PODIUM |
| | HEIGHT IS ACCEPTABLE, FURTHER DISCUSSION NECESSARY |
| | REGARDING THE BLANK WALL FACING CITY PLAZA II.12. - |
| | COMPATIBILITY WITH ADJACENT CITYPLAZA II BUILDING. |
| | FURTHER DISCUSSION NEEDED REGARDING THE PODIUM HEIGHT |
| | IN RELATION WITH THE CPII PODIUM HEIGHT, AND THE |
| | RELATIONSHIP OF SOME DESIGN ELEMENTS BETWEEN THE TWO |
| | BUILDINGS. THE GOAL IS TO MAKE THE ENTIRE BLOCK TO WORK |
| | AS A CONSISTENT URBAN BLOCK. |
| | 13. SATISFIED. MECHANICAL SCREENING AND SOUND |
| | ATTENUATION FOR ALL MECHANICAL WILL BE REQUIRED.- 13. |
| | PLEASE EXPLAIN ANY ACTIONS TAKEN TO MINIMIZE THE NOISE |
| | AND LIGHT POLLUTION FROM THE ROOFTOP TERRACES INTO THE |
| | ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL BUILDING. |
| | 14. SATISFIED. A FENCE WILL BE REQUIRED TO CONTROL |
| | ACCESS TO THE BACK OF CITY PLAZA II AND CANOPY HOTEL.- |
| | 14. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION ON HOW THE REAR AND |
| | SIDE SETBACKS ARE GOING TO BE TREATED AT GROUND LEVEL. |
| | THERE SEEM TO BE SOME ODD LEFT OVER AREAS. |
| | 15. SATISFIED, PLEASE PROVIDE A HARDSCAPE DRAWING. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE HARDSCAPE DRAWINGS WITH DETAILS. LIGHT |
| | FIXTURE AND POLE ALONG TRINITY PLACE SHALL MATCH CITY |
| | PLAZA II, ALONG DIXIE HWAY SHALL MATCH DIXIE HWAY |
| | FIXTURE AND POLE.- 15. SIDEWALK TREATMENT ON TRINITY |
| | PLACE SHALL CONTINUE THE EXISTING TREATMENT/PATTERN ON |
| | THE EAST SIDE. |
| | 16. SATISFIED.- 16. IS THE GROUND FLOOR RESTAURANT |
| | PROPOSED WITH ACCESS FROM DIXIE HWAY AND OUTDOOR |
| | SEATING? |
| | SUBMITTAL COMMENTS: |
| | 1. OK.-1. PLEASE PROVIDE REDUCED DIAGRAMS OF EVERY |
| | FLOOR INDICATING THE AREAS THAT ARE COUNTED AS PART OF |
| | THE GROSS BUILDING AREA AND THE AREAS THAT ARE NOT. |
| | INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE IN A SUMMARY TABLE. |
| | 2. ELEVATIONS SHALL HAVE SHADOWS AND INCLUDE THE |
| | CONXTEXT IN THE SAME BLOCK AND AT LEAST 200' ACROSS THE |
| | ADJACENT STREETS. - 2. PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED |
| | ELEVATIONS WITH THE SURROUNDING CONTEXT. ELEVATIONS |
| | SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION TO INDICATE ANY PLANAR BREAKS |
| | AND ITS DEPTH. |
| | 3. SUBMITTED PEDESTRIAN RENDERINGS DO NOT SEEM ACCURATE |
| | TO THE SURROUNDING CONTEXT. SHEET A5.3 SHOWS TRINITY |
| | PLACE AS TWO LANE ROAD WITH A WIDE SIDEWALK ON THE |
| | NORTH SITE, WHICH IS NOT THE CASE. PLEASE MODIFY ANY |
| | PERSPECTIVES OR RENDERINGD TO ACCURATELY REFLECT THE |
| | CONTEXT AS WELL AS THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AND HARDSCAPE |
| | FOR THE PROJECT (SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS). - 3. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN LEVEL RENDERINGS OF THE PROPOSED |
| | HOTEL. |
| | 4. NEED ADDITIONAL PICTURES OF GARAGE SCREENING |
| | MATERIAL - 4. PLEASE PROVIDE IMAGES OF PROPOSED FACADE |
| | MATERIALS AND GARAGE ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT WITH |
| | GENERAL INFORMATION ON PROPOSED MATERIAL. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
