| Date |
Text |
| 2016-01-29 16:31:58 | 1. SATISFIED- 1. EXISTING BACK OF CURB ON TRINITY PLACE |
| | ALONG THE CITY PLAZA II BUILDING SHALL BE CONTINUED |
| | WEST AND ADJUSTED IN FRONT OF THE CANOPY HOTEL IF |
| | NECESSARY. NEW CURB CUT WILL BE THE NEW BACK OF CURB |
| | FOR THE PURPOSES OF MEASURING THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. |
| | 2. SATISFIED- 2. TRAVEL LANE WIDTH SHALL BE MAINTAINED |
| | CONSISTENT FROM OLIVE AVE TO DIXIE HWAY AND CURB SHALL |
| | BE ADJUSTED IF NECESSARY. |
| | 3. SATISFIED- 3. SETBACKS ARE MEASURED FROM BACK OF |
| | CURB (EXISTING CURB ON DIXIE HWAY, AND NEW CURB ON |
| | TRINITY PLACE). |
| | 4. SATISFIED- 4. DOORS SHALL NOT SWING OVER THE MINIMUM |
| | REQUIRED SETBACK. |
| | 5. UNDER REVIEW BY TE-5. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE PARKING |
| | OPERATION IS GOING TO FUNCTION. SOME CONCERNS ARE: |
| | - CARS WAITING FOR THE ELEVATOR SHALL NOT BE STACKED |
| | IN THE PUBLIC ROW. |
| | - HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE FOR THE ELEVATOR TO GO UP AND |
| | DOWN? |
| | - WHAT HAPPENS IF THE ELEVATOR BREAKS DOWN? |
| | 6. DAC VARIANCE REQUEST- 6. ACTIVE USES ARE REQUIRED |
| | ALONG 60% OF DIXIE HWAY ON ALL FLOORS UP TO 5TH STORY. |
| | PROJECT IS PROPOSEING PARKING USES ON FLOORS 3RD TO |
| | 5TH. |
| | 7. DAC VARIANCE REQUEST- 7. PARKING IS ALLOWED ABOVE |
| | THE 5TH STORY WITHOUT ACTIVE USES, BUT A CONDITIONAL |
| | SETBACK OF 31' IS REQUIRED. |
| | 8. DAC VARIANCE REQUEST- 8. PARKING IS ALLOWED ABOVE |
| | THE 5TH STORY WITHOUT ACTIVE USES, BUT A CONDITIONAL |
| | SETBACK OF 27? IS REQUIRED. |
| | 9. NOT SATISFIED- EAST ELEVATION IS A BLANK WALL NOT |
| | PERMITTED BY THE CURRENT CODE.FURTHER DISCUSSION IS |
| | NECESSARY ON THIS ITEM.HOW IS THE INDICATED PLANNAR |
| | BREAK ON GARAGE FACING TRINITY PLACE REFLECTED ON THE |
| | FACADE? - 9. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE FACADE ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS. |
| | PLEASE CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH FENESTRATION |
| | REQUIREMENTS AND COMPLIANCE WITH PROHIBITION FOR BLANK |
| | WALLS. |
| | 10. FURTHER DISCUSSION ON OPERATION NECESSARY. - 10. |
| | PROPOSED HOTEL IS NOT PROVIDING ANY LOADING AREA. |
| | PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE HOTEL IS GOING TO BE SERVICED |
| | WITHOUT A DEDICATED LOADING AREA. TRINITY PLACE IS A |
| | SINGLE LANE ROAD AND IT CANNOT BE BLOCK AT ANY TIME. |
| | 11. FURTHER DISCUSSION NECESSARY- 11. HOW IS THE |
| | PROJECT PROPOSING TO HANDLE GARBAGE COLLECTION? |
| | 12. PODIUM HEIGHT IS ACCEPTABLE, FURTHER DISCUSSION |
| | NECESSARY REGARDING THE BLANK WALL FACING CITY PLAZA |
| | II.12. - COMPATIBILITY WITH ADJACENT CITYPLAZA II |
| | BUILDING. FURTHER DISCUSSION NEEDED REGARDING THE |
| | PODIUM HEIGHT IN RELATION WITH THE CPII PODIUM HEIGHT, |
| | AND THE RELATIONSHIP OF SOME DESIGN ELEMENTS BETWEEN |
| | THE TWO BUILDINGS. THE GOAL IS TO MAKE THE ENTIRE BLOCK |
| | TO WORK AS A CONSISTENT URBAN BLOCK. |
| | 13. SATISFIED. MECHANICAL SCREENING AND SOUND |
| | ATTENUATION FOR ALL MECHANICAL WILL BE REQUIRED.- 13. |
| | PLEASE EXPLAIN ANY ACTIONS TAKEN TO MINIMIZE THE NOISE |
| | AND LIGHT POLLUTION FROM THE ROOFTOP TERRACES INTO THE |
| | ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL BUILDING. |
| | 14. SATISFIED. A FENCE WILL BE REQUIRED TO CONTROL |
| | ACCESS TO THE BACK OF CITY PLAZA II AND CANOPY HOTEL.- |
| | 14. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION ON HOW THE REAR AND |
| | SIDE SETBACKS ARE GOING TO BE TREATED AT GROUND LEVEL. |
| | THERE SEEM TO BE SOME ODD LEFT OVER AREAS. |
| | 15. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE HARDSCAPE DRAWINGS |
| | WITH DETAILS. LIGHT FIXTURE AND POLE ALONG TRINITY |
| | PLACE SHALL MATCH CITY PLAZA II, ALONG DIXIE HWAY SHALL |
| | MATCH DIXIE HWAY FIXTURE AND POLE.- 15. SIDEWALK |
| | TREATMENT ON TRINITY PLACE SHALL CONTINUE THE EXISTING |
| | TREATMENT/PATTERN ON THE EAST SIDE. |
| | 16. SATISFIED.- 16. IS THE GROUND FLOOR RESTAURANT |
| | PROPOSED WITH ACCESS FROM DIXIE HWAY AND OUTDOOR |
| | SEATING? |
| | SUBMITTAL COMMENTS: |
| | 1. OK.-1. PLEASE PROVIDE REDUCED DIAGRAMS OF EVERY |
| | FLOOR INDICATING THE AREAS THAT ARE COUNTED AS PART OF |
| | THE GROSS BUILDING AREA AND THE AREAS THAT ARE NOT. |
| | INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE IN A SUMMARY TABLE. |
| | 2. ELEVATIONS SHALL HAVE SHADOWS AND INCLUDE THE |
| | CONXTEXT IN THE SAME BLOCK AND AT LEAST 200' ACROSS THE |
| | ADJACENT STREETS. - 2. PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED |
| | ELEVATIONS WITH THE SURROUNDING CONTEXT. ELEVATIONS |
| | SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION TO INDICATE ANY PLANAR BREAKS |
| | AND ITS DEPTH. |
| | 3. SUBMITTED PEDESTRIAN RENDERINGS DO NOT SEEM ACCURATE |
| | TO THE SURROUNDING CONTEXT. SHEET A5.3 SHOWS TRINITY |
| | PLACE AS TWO LANE ROAD WITH A WIDE SIDEWALK ON THE |
| | NORTH SITE, WHICH IS NOT THE CASE. PLEASE MODIFY ANY |
| | PERSPECTIVES OR RENDERINGD TO ACCURATELY REFLECT THE |
| | CONTEXT AS WELL AS THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AND HARDSCAPE |
| | FOR THE PROJECT (SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS). - 3. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN LEVEL RENDERINGS OF THE PROPOSED |
| | HOTEL. |
| | 4. NEED ADDITIONAL PICTURES OF GARAGE SCREENING |
| | MATERIAL - 4. PLEASE PROVIDE IMAGES OF PROPOSED FACADE |
| | MATERIALS AND GARAGE ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT WITH |
| | GENERAL INFORMATION ON PROPOSED MATERIAL. |
| | |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2ND REVIEW: |
| | 1. PLEASE EXTEND THE SPECIALTY TREATMENT OF THE |
| | SIDEWALK TO THE ACROSS THE SOUTH CURB CUT. SHEET A2.1 |
| | SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO REFLECT THE FLUSH CONDITION OF THE |
| | DRIVEWAY AS IT MEETS SIDEWALK. |
| |
Print |
